Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)

View through CrossRef
Data from the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) shows that cases of malpractice by obstetricians are quite high. For example, a malpractice case that reached the Supreme Court was a team of doctors consisting of dr. Come on, Dr. Hendi Siagian, and dr. Henry Simanjuntak at Dr.Kandau Manado Hospital against the victim, Julia Fransiska Makatey. Another case, malpractice by dr.Heryani Parewasi, Sp.OG. at Anutapura Hospital in Palu against the victim, Nur Indah Restuwati. The two cases of malpractice resulted in a decision by the Supreme Court Judge No. 871K/Pid/2018. The research method in writing this thesis uses normative legal research supported by empirical legal research. Normative legal research is library research to collect data from reference reading materials and laws and regulations, while empirical research is field research, namely the Supreme Court decision No. 871K/Pid/2018. Field research is needed to collect data directly on the objects and subjects referred to in this research. Forms of criminal acts committed by doctors in carrying out their profession are divided into three categories, namely (1) deliberate criminal malpractice; (2) Criminal malpractice that is reckless; and Criminal Malpractice that is negligent. The basis for consideration of the Supreme Court Judges in deciding case No. 871K/Pid/2018, the basic consideration is that the Defendant did not convey to the victim's family about the possibilities that could happen to the victim and sentenced him to 10 months in prison. Mechanism for resolving medical malpractice cases A civil or criminal lawsuit, in this case a dispute between doctors and hospitals dealing with patients and their families or their proxies, can be resolved in two ways, namely litigation (through the judicial process) and non-litigation (outside the judicial process). Justice). It is better if Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice is formulated regarding medical malpractice along with explanations so that the general public, doctors and the world of health can understand and know the criteria for criminal acts of medical malpractice.
PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional
Title: Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)
Description:
Data from the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) shows that cases of malpractice by obstetricians are quite high.
For example, a malpractice case that reached the Supreme Court was a team of doctors consisting of dr.
Come on, Dr.
Hendi Siagian, and dr.
Henry Simanjuntak at Dr.
Kandau Manado Hospital against the victim, Julia Fransiska Makatey.
Another case, malpractice by dr.
Heryani Parewasi, Sp.
OG.
at Anutapura Hospital in Palu against the victim, Nur Indah Restuwati.
The two cases of malpractice resulted in a decision by the Supreme Court Judge No.
871K/Pid/2018.
The research method in writing this thesis uses normative legal research supported by empirical legal research.
Normative legal research is library research to collect data from reference reading materials and laws and regulations, while empirical research is field research, namely the Supreme Court decision No.
871K/Pid/2018.
Field research is needed to collect data directly on the objects and subjects referred to in this research.
Forms of criminal acts committed by doctors in carrying out their profession are divided into three categories, namely (1) deliberate criminal malpractice; (2) Criminal malpractice that is reckless; and Criminal Malpractice that is negligent.
The basis for consideration of the Supreme Court Judges in deciding case No.
871K/Pid/2018, the basic consideration is that the Defendant did not convey to the victim's family about the possibilities that could happen to the victim and sentenced him to 10 months in prison.
Mechanism for resolving medical malpractice cases A civil or criminal lawsuit, in this case a dispute between doctors and hospitals dealing with patients and their families or their proxies, can be resolved in two ways, namely litigation (through the judicial process) and non-litigation (outside the judicial process).
Justice).
It is better if Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice is formulated regarding medical malpractice along with explanations so that the general public, doctors and the world of health can understand and know the criteria for criminal acts of medical malpractice.

Related Results

ANALISIS SUBSTANSI PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
ANALISIS SUBSTANSI PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
Pasal 18  Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi jo. Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 menyebut...
PELAKSANAAN PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KENDARI
PELAKSANAAN PIDANA UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KENDARI
Undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi selain dibekali ancaman pidana pokok juga dapat dijatuhi pidana tambahan, salah satu bentuknya adalah pembayaran uang pengganti. E...
Pertimbangan vonis hakim terhadap tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perspektif hukum pidana lslam
Pertimbangan vonis hakim terhadap tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perspektif hukum pidana lslam
Domestic violence is a violation of human rights and a form of discrimination that must be eradicated. In Islam, such acts are forbidden. If this violence repeatedly occurs, it can...
Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Dalam Dissenting Opinion Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Menurut Perspektif Keadilan
Pertimbangan Majelis Hakim Dalam Dissenting Opinion Pada Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Menurut Perspektif Keadilan
Setiap hakim wajib menyampaikan pertimbangan atau pendapat meskipun terdapat perbedaan, sesuai Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Beda pendapat antar ha...
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koorporasi Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koorporasi Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016
Korporasi adalah kumpulan orang dan/atau kekayaan yang terorganisir, baik merupakan badan hukum maupun bukan badan hukum. Dalam kaitannya korporasi sebagai subjek hukum pada tindak...

Back to Top