Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)
View through CrossRef
Data from the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) shows that cases of malpractice by obstetricians are quite high. For example, a malpractice case that reached the Supreme Court was a team of doctors consisting of dr. Come on, Dr. Hendi Siagian, and dr. Henry Simanjuntak at Dr.Kandau Manado Hospital against the victim, Julia Fransiska Makatey. Another case, malpractice by dr.Heryani Parewasi, Sp.OG. at Anutapura Hospital in Palu against the victim, Nur Indah Restuwati. The two cases of malpractice resulted in a decision by the Supreme Court Judge No. 871K/Pid/2018. The research method in writing this thesis uses normative legal research supported by empirical legal research. Normative legal research is library research to collect data from reference reading materials and laws and regulations, while empirical research is field research, namely the Supreme Court decision No. 871K/Pid/2018. Field research is needed to collect data directly on the objects and subjects referred to in this research. Forms of criminal acts committed by doctors in carrying out their profession are divided into three categories, namely (1) deliberate criminal malpractice; (2) Criminal malpractice that is reckless; and Criminal Malpractice that is negligent. The basis for consideration of the Supreme Court Judges in deciding case No. 871K/Pid/2018, the basic consideration is that the Defendant did not convey to the victim's family about the possibilities that could happen to the victim and sentenced him to 10 months in prison. Mechanism for resolving medical malpractice cases A civil or criminal lawsuit, in this case a dispute between doctors and hospitals dealing with patients and their families or their proxies, can be resolved in two ways, namely litigation (through the judicial process) and non-litigation (outside the judicial process). Justice). It is better if Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice is formulated regarding medical malpractice along with explanations so that the general public, doctors and the world of health can understand and know the criteria for criminal acts of medical malpractice.
Title: Analisis Hukum Pidana dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Malapraktik Kedokteran (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 871 K/Pid/2018)
Description:
Data from the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) shows that cases of malpractice by obstetricians are quite high.
For example, a malpractice case that reached the Supreme Court was a team of doctors consisting of dr.
Come on, Dr.
Hendi Siagian, and dr.
Henry Simanjuntak at Dr.
Kandau Manado Hospital against the victim, Julia Fransiska Makatey.
Another case, malpractice by dr.
Heryani Parewasi, Sp.
OG.
at Anutapura Hospital in Palu against the victim, Nur Indah Restuwati.
The two cases of malpractice resulted in a decision by the Supreme Court Judge No.
871K/Pid/2018.
The research method in writing this thesis uses normative legal research supported by empirical legal research.
Normative legal research is library research to collect data from reference reading materials and laws and regulations, while empirical research is field research, namely the Supreme Court decision No.
871K/Pid/2018.
Field research is needed to collect data directly on the objects and subjects referred to in this research.
Forms of criminal acts committed by doctors in carrying out their profession are divided into three categories, namely (1) deliberate criminal malpractice; (2) Criminal malpractice that is reckless; and Criminal Malpractice that is negligent.
The basis for consideration of the Supreme Court Judges in deciding case No.
871K/Pid/2018, the basic consideration is that the Defendant did not convey to the victim's family about the possibilities that could happen to the victim and sentenced him to 10 months in prison.
Mechanism for resolving medical malpractice cases A civil or criminal lawsuit, in this case a dispute between doctors and hospitals dealing with patients and their families or their proxies, can be resolved in two ways, namely litigation (through the judicial process) and non-litigation (outside the judicial process).
Justice).
It is better if Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice is formulated regarding medical malpractice along with explanations so that the general public, doctors and the world of health can understand and know the criteria for criminal acts of medical malpractice.
Related Results
ANALISIS ALASAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTI DALAM KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Nomor 104k/Pid.Sus/2018)
ANALISIS ALASAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMBATALKAN PUTUSAN JUDEX FACTI DALAM KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Putusan Nomor 104k/Pid.Sus/2018)
<p><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em>: Pe</em><em>nelitian Hukum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hal-hal yang menjadi alas an</...
Pertimbangan vonis hakim terhadap tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perspektif hukum pidana lslam
Pertimbangan vonis hakim terhadap tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perspektif hukum pidana lslam
Domestic violence is a violation of human rights and a form of discrimination that must be eradicated. In Islam, such acts are forbidden. If this violence repeatedly occurs, it can...
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koorporasi Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Koorporasi Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Peraturan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 Tahun 2016
Korporasi adalah kumpulan orang dan/atau kekayaan yang terorganisir, baik merupakan badan hukum maupun bukan badan hukum. Dalam kaitannya korporasi sebagai subjek hukum pada tindak...
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Serbuk Ampo sebagai Bahan Peledak (Studi Putusan Nomor: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk)
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Serbuk Ampo sebagai Bahan Peledak (Studi Putusan Nomor: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk)
One of the cases regarding possession of explosives is in Decision Number: 488/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Tjk which states that the defendant Kurniawan Azhar Amran Bin M. Rosyid is guilty of ...
KETURUTSERTAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA
KETURUTSERTAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA
Tindak pidana yang dalam Bahasa Belanda disebut strafbaar feit, terdiri atas tiga suku kata, yaitu straf yang diartikan sebagai pidana dan hukum, baar diartikan sebagai dapat dan b...
Menelaah prinsip keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian terhadap perkara pidana anak : tinjauan terhadap putusan pengadilan nomor 2/pid.sus-anak/2016/pn mtr
Menelaah prinsip keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian terhadap perkara pidana anak : tinjauan terhadap putusan pengadilan nomor 2/pid.sus-anak/2016/pn mtr
Nemo Punitur Sine Injuria Facto Seu Defalta yang artinya tidak ada seorang pun yang dihukum kecuali ia berbuat salah. Setiap orang yang melakukan perbuatan pidana belum tentu dijat...
POLITIK KRIMINAL TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI KUPANG
POLITIK KRIMINAL TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI KUPANG
Perdagangan orang adalah bentuk modern dari perbudakan manusia. Perdagangan orangĀ merupakan salah satu bentuk perlakuan terburuk dari pelanggaran harkat dan martabat manusia. Suat...
Analisis Tujuan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Penolakan Nafkah Madhiyah Anak (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.608/K/Ag/2003)
Analisis Tujuan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Tentang Penolakan Nafkah Madhiyah Anak (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.608/K/Ag/2003)
Nafkah madhiyah anak merupakan nafkah terdahulu yang dilalaikan atau tidak dilaksanakan oleh ayah (mantan suami) kepada anaknya sewaktu anak tersebut belum dewasa dan mandiri. Pene...

