Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Naczelnicy więzień w Rawiczu i Wronkach 1945-1956
View through CrossRef
The prison system being organised since August 1944, became a part of the Ministry of Public Security. Such a solution, dictated by political considerations, copied the Soviet model, which treated the prison guard as a part of the armed organ of the government. Identification of prison staff with the Ministry of Safety was expressed in the wording of official vows made by the guards which started: "I, a public safety officer". This unity was stressed for decades in prison staff politics, in employee certificates, and in the assessment of the implementation of tasks assigned to prison guards. The primary task put in words on the 4th of October 1944 by Boleslaw Bierut was "to render harmless those who oppose the program of PKWN [the communist Committee of National Liberation]." This directive and the subsequent resolutions and decisions of the party (PPR, PZPR) and ministries (MBP, MSW) requiring repressive treatment of political prisoners was noted in the subordinate units as a political and official license for brutality and sadism towards such prisoners. Since the beginning of the postwar system of prison system detention centres, prison and labor camps were places of repression and extermination of the citizens who were considered political opponents. Apart from the repressive measures the prison system also performed an oppressive function towards society, which was to serve the pacification pro-independence feelings. Since November 1944, the prisoners started to be classified into one of the following groups: common criminals, Volksdeutsches, persons cooperating with Germans, anti-state. Since February 1945, the term "anti-state prisoner" started to define an accused (convicted) associated with the AK and NSZ [anti-communist military organizations], war criminals and collaborators. Putting the former soldiers of the AK, NSZ, and BCH with the rest of prisoners stigmatised them, and was a part of an affliction and persecution. In practice, their status was lower (worse) than the status of other prisoners, particularly Germans. In the fifties, the rules for classification of the convicted changed twice, each time worsening the situation of political prisoners. Based on the principle of so-called unity of jurisdiction and performance required tougher sentences along with accordingly tougher prison treatment. Types of prisons corresponded to prisoners’ classification. In April 1945, eight major prisons were singled out, where the political prisoners were consigned after judgment. In January 1946, two large prison units were given the status of the central prisons, namely the facilities in Rawicz and Wronki. They retained the status of objects for political prisoners until 1956. The essential precondition for the problem and repressive and exterminative nature of these prisons was appointment of the positions of a chief, his deputy, and heads of special (operational) and political-educational departments.
Instytut Nauk Prawnych PAN (Institute of Law Studies PAS)
Title: Naczelnicy więzień w Rawiczu i Wronkach 1945-1956
Description:
The prison system being organised since August 1944, became a part of the Ministry of Public Security.
Such a solution, dictated by political considerations, copied the Soviet model, which treated the prison guard as a part of the armed organ of the government.
Identification of prison staff with the Ministry of Safety was expressed in the wording of official vows made by the guards which started: "I, a public safety officer".
This unity was stressed for decades in prison staff politics, in employee certificates, and in the assessment of the implementation of tasks assigned to prison guards.
The primary task put in words on the 4th of October 1944 by Boleslaw Bierut was "to render harmless those who oppose the program of PKWN [the communist Committee of National Liberation].
" This directive and the subsequent resolutions and decisions of the party (PPR, PZPR) and ministries (MBP, MSW) requiring repressive treatment of political prisoners was noted in the subordinate units as a political and official license for brutality and sadism towards such prisoners.
Since the beginning of the postwar system of prison system detention centres, prison and labor camps were places of repression and extermination of the citizens who were considered political opponents.
Apart from the repressive measures the prison system also performed an oppressive function towards society, which was to serve the pacification pro-independence feelings.
Since November 1944, the prisoners started to be classified into one of the following groups: common criminals, Volksdeutsches, persons cooperating with Germans, anti-state.
Since February 1945, the term "anti-state prisoner" started to define an accused (convicted) associated with the AK and NSZ [anti-communist military organizations], war criminals and collaborators.
Putting the former soldiers of the AK, NSZ, and BCH with the rest of prisoners stigmatised them, and was a part of an affliction and persecution.
In practice, their status was lower (worse) than the status of other prisoners, particularly Germans.
In the fifties, the rules for classification of the convicted changed twice, each time worsening the situation of political prisoners.
Based on the principle of so-called unity of jurisdiction and performance required tougher sentences along with accordingly tougher prison treatment.
Types of prisons corresponded to prisoners’ classification.
In April 1945, eight major prisons were singled out, where the political prisoners were consigned after judgment.
In January 1946, two large prison units were given the status of the central prisons, namely the facilities in Rawicz and Wronki.
They retained the status of objects for political prisoners until 1956.
The essential precondition for the problem and repressive and exterminative nature of these prisons was appointment of the positions of a chief, his deputy, and heads of special (operational) and political-educational departments.
Related Results
Listy z lagrów i więzień jako skrót rzeczywistości obozowej
Listy z lagrów i więzień jako skrót rzeczywistości obozowej
The article discusses Lucyna Sadzikowska’s book entitled Listy z lagrów i więzień 1939–1945. Wybrane zagadnienia (Letters from the Concentration Camps and Prisons 1939–1945. Select...
Perubahan Konstitusi dan Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesiaa
Perubahan Konstitusi dan Reformasi Ketatanegaraan Indonesiaa
Abstract: Amendment of the Constitution and constitutional reform in Indonesia. The Constitution can be two meanings, namely: a broad sense and narrow sense. Meaning constitution m...
Buchbesprechungen
Buchbesprechungen
Allgemeines
Das ist Militärgeschichte! Probleme - Projekte - Perspektiven. Hrsg. mit Unterstützung des MGFA von Christian Th. Müller und Matthias Rogg
...
Három MEFESZ a 20. századi magyar történelemben
Három MEFESZ a 20. századi magyar történelemben
The Association of Hungarian University and College Students (AHUCS, MEFESZ) was founded on 16 October 1956 at the University of Szeged. In the Hungarian history of the second half...
About the reception of Sorana Gurian’s literary work in Romania
About the reception of Sorana Gurian’s literary work in Romania
The case of Sorana Gurian (1913‑1956) allows to examine the situation of multiple exclusion in the 20th century European society: she is a Jewish woman, a stranger accused of espio...
Kedudukan Hukum Pancasila dan Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Kedudukan Hukum Pancasila dan Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia
Ketiadaan Pancasila dalam Pasal Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 menjadi perdebatan. Keberadaannya yang termaktub di dalam Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Neg...
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
The Enigma of Bishop Stephen Neill And Why He Was Forced to Leave India L'énigme de Bishop Stephen Neill et pourquoi il a dû quitter l'Inde Das Enigma Bischof Stephen Neill und warum er Indien verlassen musste El enigma del obispo Stephen Neill y por qué
The Enigma of Bishop Stephen Neill And Why He Was Forced to Leave India L'énigme de Bishop Stephen Neill et pourquoi il a dû quitter l'Inde Das Enigma Bischof Stephen Neill und warum er Indien verlassen musste El enigma del obispo Stephen Neill y por qué
AbstractBishop Stephen Neill's name elicits polarized perspectives. On the one hand he was one of the great Christian scholars of the twentieth century; on the other hand, his pers...

