Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Restoring Indonesia's (Un)Constitutional Constitution: The Soepomo's Authoritarian Constitution

View through CrossRef
In recent years, there is an idea in Indonesia political discourse to restore the original version of the 1945 Constitution to undo the liberal-democratic amendments introduced between 1999 and 2002, because in the eyes of some Indonesian public figures, these amendments is not legitimate, since it eliminated the basic values of the original version of the 1945 Constitution, which was built on the ‘integralist’ concept, as propounded by Soepomo (its main architect). According to this conception, the state should be seen as a family in which the government serves a benevolent fatherly role in guiding its children (the people) to the right choice. That is why in the integralist conception, the government is not requiring the limitation of power in regards to maintaining public order. This concept clearly contradicts the basic values of the amendments in 1999 until 2002, which changes the 1945 Constitution into a constitution that represents a liberal-democratic values. This amendment shows that Indonesia has experienced what Richard Albert calls ‘constitutional dismemberment’, or changes that do not cohere with the existing constitution because it transforms the structure and identity of the constitution without formally replacing it. However, in this paper, I want to prove that this amendment was legitimate, even though it makes the 1945 Constitution into a different one. This is because the original version of the 1945 Constitution was formed only by a handful of elites in an institution formed by the Japanese imperial government when they were still colonizing Indonesia in early 1945, meanwhile, the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) members who amended the 1945 Constitution from 1999 to 2002 had a greater democratic legitimacy than the founders of the 1945 Constitution because they were elected through the 1999 elections. Apart from that, the original version of the 1945 Constitution was never intended by its founder to operate after the Indonesian revolutionary period, that happen between 1945 until 1949, so that the document can be significantly changed or even replaced by the MPR through the amendment process.
Title: Restoring Indonesia's (Un)Constitutional Constitution: The Soepomo's Authoritarian Constitution
Description:
In recent years, there is an idea in Indonesia political discourse to restore the original version of the 1945 Constitution to undo the liberal-democratic amendments introduced between 1999 and 2002, because in the eyes of some Indonesian public figures, these amendments is not legitimate, since it eliminated the basic values of the original version of the 1945 Constitution, which was built on the ‘integralist’ concept, as propounded by Soepomo (its main architect).
According to this conception, the state should be seen as a family in which the government serves a benevolent fatherly role in guiding its children (the people) to the right choice.
That is why in the integralist conception, the government is not requiring the limitation of power in regards to maintaining public order.
This concept clearly contradicts the basic values of the amendments in 1999 until 2002, which changes the 1945 Constitution into a constitution that represents a liberal-democratic values.
This amendment shows that Indonesia has experienced what Richard Albert calls ‘constitutional dismemberment’, or changes that do not cohere with the existing constitution because it transforms the structure and identity of the constitution without formally replacing it.
However, in this paper, I want to prove that this amendment was legitimate, even though it makes the 1945 Constitution into a different one.
This is because the original version of the 1945 Constitution was formed only by a handful of elites in an institution formed by the Japanese imperial government when they were still colonizing Indonesia in early 1945, meanwhile, the People’s Consultative Assembly (MPR) members who amended the 1945 Constitution from 1999 to 2002 had a greater democratic legitimacy than the founders of the 1945 Constitution because they were elected through the 1999 elections.
Apart from that, the original version of the 1945 Constitution was never intended by its founder to operate after the Indonesian revolutionary period, that happen between 1945 until 1949, so that the document can be significantly changed or even replaced by the MPR through the amendment process.

Related Results

From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
Problems of Implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine: Analysis and Solutions
The article analyses the main problems of the implementation of the Constitution of Ukraine and identifies the constitutional and legal means of their solution. As a methodologica...
Constitutional Mobilization
Constitutional Mobilization
People around the world are mobilizing for constitutional change. This global phenomenon has been under-explored in comparative constitutional studies. This Article introduces the ...
Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law
Constitutional Amendments and the Constitutional Common Law
Constitutions obsolesce rapidly, and must be updated over time to reflect changes in the polity's circumstances and citizens' values. What institution or process should be entrust...
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...

Back to Top