Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Particularist but Codifiable Virtue Ethics

View through CrossRef
Abstract Moral particularism of the kind developed by Jonathan Dancy is treated as a topic in meta-ethics. Until it is applied to a suitable type of normative theory criticisms which have assailed it are difficult to rebut. This chapter aims to apply Dancy’s particularism to target centred virtue ethics, showing how many of these criticisms are off the mark. At the core of these criticisms is that of uncodifiability. Virtue ethics is held to be codifiable through the virtue rules which encode virtue-reasons for action, reasons which are argued to be particularist in Dancy’s sense. That is it is possible even for reasons expressed through the thick virtue concepts to switch valence. In the course of the argument a virtue ethical view of right action (the target-centred view) is further developed.
Oxford University PressOxford
Title: A Particularist but Codifiable Virtue Ethics
Description:
Abstract Moral particularism of the kind developed by Jonathan Dancy is treated as a topic in meta-ethics.
Until it is applied to a suitable type of normative theory criticisms which have assailed it are difficult to rebut.
This chapter aims to apply Dancy’s particularism to target centred virtue ethics, showing how many of these criticisms are off the mark.
At the core of these criticisms is that of uncodifiability.
Virtue ethics is held to be codifiable through the virtue rules which encode virtue-reasons for action, reasons which are argued to be particularist in Dancy’s sense.
That is it is possible even for reasons expressed through the thick virtue concepts to switch valence.
In the course of the argument a virtue ethical view of right action (the target-centred view) is further developed.

Related Results

A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract Virtue ethics in its contemporary manifestation is dominated by neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics primarily developed by Rosalind Hursthouse. This version of e...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Abstract The development of ‘virtue jurisprudence’ (a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics for law) has highlighted the importance of virtue in legal ethics. Yet it has be...
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Abstract Post-Kohlbergian developmental psychology has recognized the philosophical contribution of virtue ethics to the reclamation of character as an object of stu...
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract This chapter distinguishes eudaimonistic virtue ethics (in contemporary forms) in terms of which virtue ethics as such is often defined, from Target Centred...
Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
Abstract The chapter examines the compatibility of W. D. Ross’s ethical theory with virtue ethics. While Ross is traditionally viewed as a deontologist, we argue tha...
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract This chapter provides an epistemology for virtue ethics—target-centred virtue epistemology, arguing that we all need the epistemic virtues rather than relyi...
Pluralistic Virtue Ethics
Pluralistic Virtue Ethics
Abstract This chapter advocates a pluralistic form of virtue ethics according to which there are several ultimate grounds of virtue, features which make traits of ch...

Back to Top