Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter distinguishes eudaimonistic virtue ethics (in contemporary forms) in terms of which virtue ethics as such is often defined, from Target Centred Virtue Ethics. This form of virtue ethics comprises two main theses: a target-centred account of what makes a trait of character a virtue and a target-centred account of right action. Target Centred Virtue Ethics is given a partial defence in this chapter. Part of this defence involves getting clear on what are the presuppositions of contemporary eudaimonistic virtue ethics, for these may be more or less controversial. Another part discusses the problems of indirection and egoism faced by eudaimonism, and the target-centred virtue ethical response.
Title: Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Description:
Abstract
This chapter distinguishes eudaimonistic virtue ethics (in contemporary forms) in terms of which virtue ethics as such is often defined, from Target Centred Virtue Ethics.
This form of virtue ethics comprises two main theses: a target-centred account of what makes a trait of character a virtue and a target-centred account of right action.
Target Centred Virtue Ethics is given a partial defence in this chapter.
Part of this defence involves getting clear on what are the presuppositions of contemporary eudaimonistic virtue ethics, for these may be more or less controversial.
Another part discusses the problems of indirection and egoism faced by eudaimonism, and the target-centred virtue ethical response.
Related Results
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract
Virtue ethics in its contemporary manifestation is dominated by neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics primarily developed by Rosalind Hursthouse. This version of e...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Abstract
The development of ‘virtue jurisprudence’ (a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics for law) has highlighted the importance of virtue in legal ethics. Yet it has be...
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract
This chapter provides an epistemology for virtue ethics—target-centred virtue epistemology, arguing that we all need the epistemic virtues rather than relyi...
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Abstract
Post-Kohlbergian developmental psychology has recognized the philosophical contribution of virtue ethics to the reclamation of character as an object of stu...
Basic Virtue and Differentiated Virtue
Basic Virtue and Differentiated Virtue
Abstract
This chapter argues that virtue ethics in traditional form has been overly simple, since it has not adequately integrated within its theoretical structures ...
A Particularist but Codifiable Virtue Ethics
A Particularist but Codifiable Virtue Ethics
Abstract
Moral particularism of the kind developed by Jonathan Dancy is treated as a topic in meta-ethics. Until it is applied to a suitable type of normative theory...
Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
Abstract
The chapter examines the compatibility of W. D. Ross’s ethical theory with virtue ethics. While Ross is traditionally viewed as a deontologist, we argue tha...

