Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Virtue Ethics

View through CrossRef
AbstractVirtue ethics is an approach to normative ethical theory that builds upon the notion that virtue evaluation isprimary. For this reason it is useful to distinguish virtue ethics itself from the broader category of virtue theory. Virtue theory is compatible with other normative ethical theories such as Kantian ethics and utilitarianism, both of which offer distinctive accounts of virtue (seeKant, Immanuel; Utilitarianism). However, on those theories, virtue evaluation is understood in terms of more basic normative notions. Virtue ethics is distinctive in treating virtue itself as basic. Different approaches to virtue ethics have developed this idea differently. Some hold that virtue evaluation replaces deontic action evaluation. Instead of “that was morally right” or “that is what he morally ought to do” we get evaluations of the sort “that was a kind act” or “what a kind person.” However, the more common view is that action evaluation must be understood in terms of virtue evaluation rather than the other way around.
Title: Virtue Ethics
Description:
AbstractVirtue ethics is an approach to normative ethical theory that builds upon the notion that virtue evaluation isprimary.
For this reason it is useful to distinguish virtue ethics itself from the broader category of virtue theory.
Virtue theory is compatible with other normative ethical theories such as Kantian ethics and utilitarianism, both of which offer distinctive accounts of virtue (seeKant, Immanuel; Utilitarianism).
However, on those theories, virtue evaluation is understood in terms of more basic normative notions.
Virtue ethics is distinctive in treating virtue itself as basic.
Different approaches to virtue ethics have developed this idea differently.
Some hold that virtue evaluation replaces deontic action evaluation.
Instead of “that was morally right” or “that is what he morally ought to do” we get evaluations of the sort “that was a kind act” or “what a kind person.
” However, the more common view is that action evaluation must be understood in terms of virtue evaluation rather than the other way around.

Related Results

A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash INTRODUCTION Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Introduction
Introduction
Abstract This book links together an account of love with virtue ethics. The overall moral theoretic framework presupposed is a form of virtue ethics; specifically t...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Abstract The development of ‘virtue jurisprudence’ (a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics for law) has highlighted the importance of virtue in legal ethics. Yet it has be...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract Virtue ethics in its contemporary manifestation is dominated by neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics primarily developed by Rosalind Hursthouse. This version o...
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Abstract Post-Kohlbergian developmental psychology has recognized the philosophical contribution of virtue ethics to the reclamation of character as an object of stu...
John Doris' Excellence Adventure
John Doris' Excellence Adventure
Abstract: In his book Lack of Character (2002 Cambridge University Press) John Doris argues that both virtue ethics and common sense or folk psychology are committed to the claim t...
Originalism and the Aristotelian Tradition: Virtue’s Home in Originalism
Originalism and the Aristotelian Tradition: Virtue’s Home in Originalism
A concept fundamental to philosophy – virtue – is, with a few notable exceptions, absent from scholarship on constitutional interpretation generally, and originalism in particular....
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract This chapter distinguishes eudaimonistic virtue ethics (in contemporary forms) in terms of which virtue ethics as such is often defined, from Target Centred...

Back to Top