Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The chapter examines the compatibility of W. D. Ross’s ethical theory with virtue ethics. While Ross is traditionally viewed as a deontologist, we argue that some aspects of his theory align with virtue ethics. We define key characteristics of virtue ethics, including the centrality of virtue, focus on moral agents, and an anti-theoretical approach, and then assess Ross’s ethics against these criteria. We elaborate on the importance of the category of virtue in Ross’s ethics, his views on moral reasoning, and the role of the moral agent, ultimately arguing for Ross’s significant vicinity to virtue ethics. We also suggest that Ross’s concept of prima facie duties and his moderate deontological approach could be valuable for developing virtue ethics, positing Ross as a bridge between deontological and virtue ethics.
Title: Ross and the Ethics of Virtue
Description:
Abstract
The chapter examines the compatibility of W.
D.
Ross’s ethical theory with virtue ethics.
While Ross is traditionally viewed as a deontologist, we argue that some aspects of his theory align with virtue ethics.
We define key characteristics of virtue ethics, including the centrality of virtue, focus on moral agents, and an anti-theoretical approach, and then assess Ross’s ethics against these criteria.
We elaborate on the importance of the category of virtue in Ross’s ethics, his views on moral reasoning, and the role of the moral agent, ultimately arguing for Ross’s significant vicinity to virtue ethics.
We also suggest that Ross’s concept of prima facie duties and his moderate deontological approach could be valuable for developing virtue ethics, positing Ross as a bridge between deontological and virtue ethics.
Related Results
A Critique of Principlism
A Critique of Principlism
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
Bioethics does not have an explicitly stated and agreed upon means of resolving conflicts between normative theories. As such, b...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract
Virtue ethics in its contemporary manifestation is dominated by neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics primarily developed by Rosalind Hursthouse. This version of e...
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Target Centred Virtue Ethics and Role Ethics
Abstract
The development of ‘virtue jurisprudence’ (a neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics for law) has highlighted the importance of virtue in legal ethics. Yet it has be...
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Developmental Virtue Ethics
Abstract
Post-Kohlbergian developmental psychology has recognized the philosophical contribution of virtue ethics to the reclamation of character as an object of stu...
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Eudaimonistic versus Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract
This chapter distinguishes eudaimonistic virtue ethics (in contemporary forms) in terms of which virtue ethics as such is often defined, from Target Centred...
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
An Epistemology for Target Centred Virtue Ethics
Abstract
This chapter provides an epistemology for virtue ethics—target-centred virtue epistemology, arguing that we all need the epistemic virtues rather than relyi...
Pluralistic Virtue Ethics
Pluralistic Virtue Ethics
Abstract
This chapter advocates a pluralistic form of virtue ethics according to which there are several ultimate grounds of virtue, features which make traits of ch...
Basic Virtue and Differentiated Virtue
Basic Virtue and Differentiated Virtue
Abstract
This chapter argues that virtue ethics in traditional form has been overly simple, since it has not adequately integrated within its theoretical structures ...

