Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah

View through CrossRef
The formulation of this thesis problem has three aspects, those are: (1) How is the authority of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving sharia economics disputes before the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012, (2) How is the authority of the Religious Court of Kediri in the settlement of the sharia economics dispute after the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012 (3) How is the role of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving the sharia economics dispute after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012?The Research method used is qualitative method since this research describing an object in accordance with reality that is about the role of religious court of Kediri. Technique of collecting data is through interviewing and recording, while the data that has been obtained is analyzed by using descriptive analysis technique with deductive inductive pattern.Based on the results of the research and the discussion done it can be summarized as follows: 1. The Judges of Religious Court of Kediri disagree if the sharia banking dispute must be resolved through the General Court. Based on the reason that the operational activity in Sharia Bank uses sharia principles, therefore if there is a dispute then the resolution is in the Religious Court instead of General Court. 2. The Judges of Religious Court of Kediri argue that it is true if the resolution of the sharia banking dispute is the absolute authority of the Court within the Religious Court. 3. The role of Kediri Religion Court in facing the existence of authority in the resolution of Shariah economic dispute after the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 93 / PUU-X / 2012 is through following the technical training of sharia economic dispute resolution held by the Supreme Court and Financial Services Authority, following the education and training held by the courtroom of the Supreme Court and Ibnu Saud University of Saudi Arabia and reading many books related to the sharia economic.On the basis of the results above, the researcher suggests to Judge of Religious Court of Kediri to be able to improve the quality especially in the field of sharia economy and the law of agreement and hopefully for the further researcher can analyze and examine more about sharia economic disputes both litigation and non litigation. Key words: Religious Courts, Shari'a Economics, Constitutional Court
Title: Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Description:
The formulation of this thesis problem has three aspects, those are: (1) How is the authority of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving sharia economics disputes before the Decision of the Constitutional Court No.
93 / PUU-X / 2012, (2) How is the authority of the Religious Court of Kediri in the settlement of the sharia economics dispute after the Decision of the Constitutional Court No.
93 / PUU-X / 2012 (3) How is the role of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving the sharia economics dispute after the Constitutional Court Decision No.
93 / PUU-X / 2012?The Research method used is qualitative method since this research describing an object in accordance with reality that is about the role of religious court of Kediri.
Technique of collecting data is through interviewing and recording, while the data that has been obtained is analyzed by using descriptive analysis technique with deductive inductive pattern.
Based on the results of the research and the discussion done it can be summarized as follows: 1.
The Judges of Religious Court of Kediri disagree if the sharia banking dispute must be resolved through the General Court.
Based on the reason that the operational activity in Sharia Bank uses sharia principles, therefore if there is a dispute then the resolution is in the Religious Court instead of General Court.
2.
The Judges of Religious Court of Kediri argue that it is true if the resolution of the sharia banking dispute is the absolute authority of the Court within the Religious Court.
3.
The role of Kediri Religion Court in facing the existence of authority in the resolution of Shariah economic dispute after the Decision of the Constitutional Court No.
93 / PUU-X / 2012 is through following the technical training of sharia economic dispute resolution held by the Supreme Court and Financial Services Authority, following the education and training held by the courtroom of the Supreme Court and Ibnu Saud University of Saudi Arabia and reading many books related to the sharia economic.
On the basis of the results above, the researcher suggests to Judge of Religious Court of Kediri to be able to improve the quality especially in the field of sharia economy and the law of agreement and hopefully for the further researcher can analyze and examine more about sharia economic disputes both litigation and non litigation.
 Key words: Religious Courts, Shari'a Economics, Constitutional Court.

Related Results

IMPLEMENTASI MAQASHID SYARI'AH DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH (STUDI KASUS PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN MAROS)
IMPLEMENTASI MAQASHID SYARI'AH DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH (STUDI KASUS PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA KABUPATEN MAROS)
Seiring berkembangnya zaman yang disertai dengan pertumbuhan dan perkembangan ekonomi syariah yang semakin pesat, tentu ekonomi syariah tidak lepas dari pada permasalahan-permasala...
Peran Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Peran Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Abstract The enactment of  Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning Religious Courts which in addition increases the authority of the Religious Courts in the field of Islamic economics, thi...
Frase ‘Antara Lain’ Sebagai Awal Alasan Yang Lain Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase
Frase ‘Antara Lain’ Sebagai Awal Alasan Yang Lain Dalam Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase
Manusia adalah makhluk sosial yang selalu membutuhkan manusia lainnya untuk bertahan hidup.Oleh sebab itulah Aristoteles menyebut manusia dengan “zoon politicon.” Memang menjadi se...
Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Ekstra Yudisial
Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Ekstra Yudisial
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum penyelesaian sengketa melalui lembaga ekstra yudisial serta alasan mengapa putusan yang dihasilkan oleh lembaga tersebut...
Efektivitas Peran Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Bidang Bisnis Maupun Hukum
Efektivitas Peran Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Bidang Bisnis Maupun Hukum
Sengketa antara para pihak dapat diselesaikan melalui jalur litigasi (lembaga Peradilan) ataupun non litigasi (di luar Pengadilan). Penyelesaian sengketa melalui jalur litigasi yai...
Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama
Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama
Dalam menyelesaikan sengketa hukum ekonomi syariah harus melalui arbitrase atau pengadilan agama. Dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai penyelesaian sengketa hukum di Pengadil...
Eksistensi Peradilan Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sumatera Barat
Eksistensi Peradilan Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sumatera Barat
Peradilan adat merupakan suatu lembaga organik yang berperan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa dalam sistem hukum adat. Pada daerah Minangkabau berdasarkan Pasal 1 ayat (8) Perda Prov. ...
Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Hak Waris Anak Beda Agama Menurut Prespektif Hukum Islam
Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Hak Waris Anak Beda Agama Menurut Prespektif Hukum Islam
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk  penyelesaian hukum terhadap sengketa hak waris anak beda agama dan keadilan yang hendak dicapai dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak ...

Back to Top