Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA

View through CrossRef
The right of a trademark is an exclusive right granted by government. A registered trademark can be cancelled from the General List of Trademark. Cancellation of registration of a trademark can be claimed by a third party through a dispute to a Commercial Court based on article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001. This research is aimed at studying the use of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 as the base of dispute for cancelation of the registration of a trademark by a third party, and studying the legal consequences of a trademark cancelation. A qualitative juridicial normative method with descriptive analyses approaches was used to analyze secondary data derived from documents of decisions of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta Number 06/Merek/205/PN.Niaga.JKT.PST and documents of decisions of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 031K/N/HaKI2005. The result of the research showed that the application of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 for the base of decision of the judges of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta was inappropritate. In judging at the use of a trademark, the judges only looked at the inconsistency of writtting styles or fonts or colours, but not taking into considerations of the purpose and intention of the parties that claimed the dispute. Cancelation of regitration of a trademark based on the dispute of a third party automatically resulted in the termination of legal protection of the related trademark.Keywords: trademark, cancelation of a trademark, third party, good intention, Commercial Court
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Title: PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA
Description:
The right of a trademark is an exclusive right granted by government.
A registered trademark can be cancelled from the General List of Trademark.
Cancellation of registration of a trademark can be claimed by a third party through a dispute to a Commercial Court based on article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001.
This research is aimed at studying the use of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 as the base of dispute for cancelation of the registration of a trademark by a third party, and studying the legal consequences of a trademark cancelation.
A qualitative juridicial normative method with descriptive analyses approaches was used to analyze secondary data derived from documents of decisions of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta Number 06/Merek/205/PN.
Niaga.
JKT.
PST and documents of decisions of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 031K/N/HaKI2005.
The result of the research showed that the application of article 61 paragraph (2) letter b of Trademark Law 2001 for the base of decision of the judges of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta was inappropritate.
In judging at the use of a trademark, the judges only looked at the inconsistency of writtting styles or fonts or colours, but not taking into considerations of the purpose and intention of the parties that claimed the dispute.
Cancelation of regitration of a trademark based on the dispute of a third party automatically resulted in the termination of legal protection of the related trademark.
Keywords: trademark, cancelation of a trademark, third party, good intention, Commercial Court.

Related Results

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar
<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisa bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap merek yang terdaftar dan mengapa perlindungan terhadap merek yang terdaftar d...
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK YANG TERDAFTAR
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP MEREK YANG TERDAFTAR
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisa bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap merek yang terdaftar dan mengapa perlindungan terhadap merek yang terdaftar dapat bera...
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Terdaftar
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Merek Terdaftar
According to Article 1 of Law No. 15 of 2001 on Trademarks, which meant brand is a sign in the form of images, names, words, letters numbers, color composition, or a combination of...
AKIBAT HUKUM KETIDAK HADIRAN PRINSIPAL DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA
AKIBAT HUKUM KETIDAK HADIRAN PRINSIPAL DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA
Tujuan penelitian ini yang berjudul Akibat Hukum Ketidak Hadiran Prinsipal Dalam Proses Persidangan Gugatan Sederhana. Adapun jenis penelitian yang penulis gunakan adalah jenis pen...
STUDI KAJIAN TENTANG GUGATAN INTERVENSI DALAM PERKARA PERDATA
STUDI KAJIAN TENTANG GUGATAN INTERVENSI DALAM PERKARA PERDATA
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui secara seksama mengenai proses pemeriksaan gugatan intervensi dalam perkara perdata di Indonesia dan bentuk –bentuk intervensi. Intervensi...
ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PENDAFTARAN MEREK: STUDI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMILIK MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA
ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PENDAFTARAN MEREK: STUDI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMILIK MEREK TERKENAL DI INDONESIA
Salah satu perkara sengketa Merek ALSTYLE yang diajukan oleh Gildan Active-Wear yang membuktikan keterkenalan mereknya mengajukan upaya hukum terhadap pemilik merek yang sama denga...
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengalihan Hak Atas Merek Berdasarkan Kasus Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengalihan Hak Atas Merek Berdasarkan Kasus Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia
Makalah yang berjudul “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengalihan Hak atas Merek Berdasarkan Kasus Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia” ini dilatarbelakangi dengan persaingan bisnis di Indones...
MEREK TIGA DIMENSI DALAM HUKUM MEREK INDONESIA
MEREK TIGA DIMENSI DALAM HUKUM MEREK INDONESIA
ABSTRAK Indonesia telah mengakui dan melindungi merek non-tradisional khususnya merek tiga dimensi (3D) sebagaimana tertuang dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek ...

Back to Top