Javascript must be enabled to continue!
OTORITAS HADIS AHAD DAN KRITERIA KESHAHIHANNYA PERSPEKTIF MUHAMMAD AL-GHAZALI DALAM KITAB AL-SUNNAH Al-AL-NABAWIYYAH BAIN AHL AL-FIQH WA AHL AL-ḤADĪṠ
View through CrossRef
This study aims to describe and analyze Muhammad al-Ghazali's thoughts on the authority of the hadith ahad and the criteria for authenticity of the hadith formulated in the book al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyah Baina ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Ḥadīṡ The main issues raised are 1) how Muhammad's thoughts al-Ghazali about the authority of the hadith ahad and the criteria for its authenticity, 2) how is the method of criticism of Muhammad al-Ghazali in relation to the understanding of the Prophet's Hadith. This type of research is library research, which uses literature in the form of books and articles as primary data sources and secondary data sources, data collection techniques are direct and indirect citations. The data analysis technique used is content analysis, which is an effort to describe and analyze in depth the content of written or printed information objectively and systematically. The results of this study are 1) Al-Ghazali set five criteria as requirements in the hadith to be accepted properly; three criteria related to sanad and two criteria related to matan (hadith material). The three criteria related to the sanad are; a. dhabit narrator, b. Fair narrator, c. Points one and two must be owned by all narrators in the sanad. He did not include the continuity of the chain as a criterion for the validity of the hadith, because according to him this element had actually entered into the criteria for point two. Criteria related to matan, are: a) Matter of hadith is not syā (one or more of the narrators contradict their narration with a narrator who is more accurate and more reliable), b) Matan hadith does not contain illat qadhihah, i.e. deficiencies that are known by hadith experts so they reject the history of a narrator. 2) Al-Ghazali's method in critiquing the hadiths goes through four steps, namely testing with the Qur'an, testing with Hadith, testing with historical facts, and testing with scientific truth.
Title: OTORITAS HADIS AHAD DAN KRITERIA KESHAHIHANNYA PERSPEKTIF MUHAMMAD AL-GHAZALI DALAM KITAB AL-SUNNAH Al-AL-NABAWIYYAH BAIN AHL AL-FIQH WA AHL AL-ḤADĪṠ
Description:
This study aims to describe and analyze Muhammad al-Ghazali's thoughts on the authority of the hadith ahad and the criteria for authenticity of the hadith formulated in the book al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyah Baina ahl al-Fiqh wa Ahl al-Ḥadīṡ The main issues raised are 1) how Muhammad's thoughts al-Ghazali about the authority of the hadith ahad and the criteria for its authenticity, 2) how is the method of criticism of Muhammad al-Ghazali in relation to the understanding of the Prophet's Hadith.
This type of research is library research, which uses literature in the form of books and articles as primary data sources and secondary data sources, data collection techniques are direct and indirect citations.
The data analysis technique used is content analysis, which is an effort to describe and analyze in depth the content of written or printed information objectively and systematically.
The results of this study are 1) Al-Ghazali set five criteria as requirements in the hadith to be accepted properly; three criteria related to sanad and two criteria related to matan (hadith material).
The three criteria related to the sanad are; a.
dhabit narrator, b.
Fair narrator, c.
Points one and two must be owned by all narrators in the sanad.
He did not include the continuity of the chain as a criterion for the validity of the hadith, because according to him this element had actually entered into the criteria for point two.
Criteria related to matan, are: a) Matter of hadith is not syā (one or more of the narrators contradict their narration with a narrator who is more accurate and more reliable), b) Matan hadith does not contain illat qadhihah, i.
e.
deficiencies that are known by hadith experts so they reject the history of a narrator.
2) Al-Ghazali's method in critiquing the hadiths goes through four steps, namely testing with the Qur'an, testing with Hadith, testing with historical facts, and testing with scientific truth.
Related Results
METODE MUHAMMAD NASHIRUDDIN AL-ALBANI DALAM MENDAIFKAN HADIS: TELAAH KITAB DAIF SUNAN ABU DAUD
METODE MUHAMMAD NASHIRUDDIN AL-ALBANI DALAM MENDAIFKAN HADIS: TELAAH KITAB DAIF SUNAN ABU DAUD
Sunan Abu Dawud merupakan salah satu dari enam kitab hadis utama dalam tradisi hadis Sunni. Kitab ini disusun oleh Imam Abu Dawud Sulaiman bin al-Ash'ath al-Sijistani pada abad ke-...
PENYELESAIAN HADIS MUKHTALIF TENTANG PENYAKIT YANG TERTULAR, JUNUB DAN ZIARAH KUBUR
PENYELESAIAN HADIS MUKHTALIF TENTANG PENYAKIT YANG TERTULAR, JUNUB DAN ZIARAH KUBUR
Hadis merupakan sumber utama pedoman hidup setelah al-Qur’an. Berdasarkan faktanya tidak semua hadis bersumber dari Rasulullah, pasal ini dilihat dari konteks sejarah perkembangann...
Peran Hadratus Syaikh Kh. Hasyim Asyari dalam Pengembangan Hadis di Indonesia
Peran Hadratus Syaikh Kh. Hasyim Asyari dalam Pengembangan Hadis di Indonesia
Sebagai negara yang penduduknya mayoritas Muslim, perkembangan hadis tentunya masuk ke Indonesia, menjadi menarik untuk dibahas karena sebagian besar penikmat ilmu hadis sendiri be...
KRITIK TERHADAP KITAB SHAHIH AL-BUKHARI DAN SHAHIH MUSLIM
KRITIK TERHADAP KITAB SHAHIH AL-BUKHARI DAN SHAHIH MUSLIM
Para ulama telah sepakat tentang keautentikan hadis-hadis yang termuat dalam kitab Shahih al-Bukhari dan Shahih Muslim. Namun sekarang, sebagian ulama sudah mulai melakukan kritik ...
Metode Penelitian Fiqh al-Hadis
Metode Penelitian Fiqh al-Hadis
Hadis Nabi dalam hierarki sumber hukum Islam berada pada kedudukan kedua selepas al-Quran. Hadis berfungsi untuk menjelaskan, menafsirkan apa yang terkandung dalam al-Qur...
Kontribusi Ali Mustafa Yaqub (1952-2016) dalam Dinamika Kajian Hadis di Indonesia
Kontribusi Ali Mustafa Yaqub (1952-2016) dalam Dinamika Kajian Hadis di Indonesia
<p>Artikel ini akan membahas tentang kontribusi Ali Mustafa Yaqub dalam dinamika kajian hadis di Indonesia. Ia adalah salah seorang pakar di bidang hadis. Hadis-hadis yang di...
EPISTEMOLOGI KRITIK HADIS
EPISTEMOLOGI KRITIK HADIS
Hadis disepakati sebagai sumber ajaran Islam kedua setelah al-Qur’an. Namun, untuk dapat menjadikannya sebagai dasar ajaran, hadis harus melewati uji naqd al-hadis dan fiqh al-hadi...
FIQH MUHAMMAD RASYID RIDLA
FIQH MUHAMMAD RASYID RIDLA
Perbedaan pendapat dalam fiqh adalah suatu yang tidak terhindarkan. Karena itu pula fiqh kerap diidentikkan dengan perbedaan pendapat. Di antara persoalan yang sejak dulu senantias...

