Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

KAJIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYELIDIKAN ANTARA KEPOLISIAN, KPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN PIDANA KORUPSI DARI KELEMBAGAAN NEGARA

View through CrossRef
<p>There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No. 2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations. Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law. The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government. The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.</p><p><strong>Keywords : <em>Authority, investigation, KPK</em></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>
Title: KAJIAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN PENYELIDIKAN ANTARA KEPOLISIAN, KPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN PIDANA KORUPSI DARI KELEMBAGAAN NEGARA
Description:
<p>There are two law enforcement agencies combating corruption, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Police, having the same authority, but in implementing authority there are differences, for example in the application of laws that govern the two institutions.
The problem that becomes the study of this research is how the problem of the existence of the KPK as an institution to eradicate corruption has the authority regulated in RI Law No.
30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, whose authority lies with the Police regulated in RI Law No.
2 of 2002 concerning the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia which refers to the Criminal Code The results of the study showed that the resolution of the dispute between the Police and the Corruption Eradication Commission in the investigation of corruption was carried out by coordinating the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Police in Corruption Criminal Investigations.
Law number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission regulates the relationship between the performance of the KPK and the Police regarding investigations, investigations and prosecutions.
Settlement of authority disputes between the Police and the KPK should be the authority of the Supreme Court, due to judicial review under the Supreme Court Law.
The right to test the law is the application of a balanced and balanced government.
The Corruption Eradication Commission was formed by the Law 30/2002 whereas the Indonesian Police was formed by the 1945 Constitution, article 30 paragraph 4.
</p><p><strong>Keywords : <em>Authority, investigation, KPK</em></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p>.

Related Results

ARAH KEBIJAKAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA:KAJIAN PASCA PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI
ARAH KEBIJAKAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA:KAJIAN PASCA PERUBAHAN UNDANG-UNDANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI
Pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi masih menjadi agenda utama dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Lahirnya Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai ujung tombak pemberantasan ko...
Sengketa Kewenangan Penyidikan Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Korupsi
Sengketa Kewenangan Penyidikan Dalam Rangka Pemberantasan Korupsi
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi seringkali terjadinya tumpang tindih kewenangan dalam penyidikan tindak korupsi antar Polri, Kejaksaan, dan KPK. Contoh kasus korupsi pimpinan anggo...
tugas resume hukum tata negara
tugas resume hukum tata negara
Hukum tata Negara dapar diartikan dalam arti sempit maupun dalam arti luas. Secara arti sempit hukum tata negara dapat diartikan hukum yang mengatur organisasi negra sedangkan dala...
tugas hukum tata negara
tugas hukum tata negara
Tujuan Hukum Tata Negara yang di simpulkan beberapa definisi di atas,bahwa hukum HTN mengkaji beberapa aspek krusial,yakni Negara/ organ Negara,hubungan antara organ/lembaga Negara...
ANISHA-HTN
ANISHA-HTN
NAMA:ANISHANIM :10200120233KELAS :HTN-FMATA KULIAH:HUKUM TATA NEGARAHUKUM TATA NEGARAA.Pengertian Hukum tata Negara pada dasarnya adalah hukum yang mengatur organisasi kek...
Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Reformulasi Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Tahun 2019 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi   Legal Policy Reformulation of Law Number 19 of 2019 Concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission   Nayla Adelina Istika, Sup...
Analisa Hukum Penetapan Tersangka Yang Didasarkan Alat Bukti Hasil Penyelidikan Oleh KPK
Analisa Hukum Penetapan Tersangka Yang Didasarkan Alat Bukti Hasil Penyelidikan Oleh KPK
This research is motivated by the practice carried out by the Corruption Eradicating Commission (KPK) in determining someone as a suspect along with the issuance of an Investigatio...

Back to Top