Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eksistensi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PPU-XVIII/2020
View through CrossRef
This study aims to find out and understand the existence of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020, and the legal meaning of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 in terms of legal certainty . The research was carried out using normative research methods, using regulatory, conceptualization and case approaches. The research results show that the existence of the Job Creation Law has an impact on the status of Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 between existence and absence. It is said to exist because it is used as a juridical basis in the Job Creation Law, but substantively the decision of the Job Creation Constitutional Court, especially the constitutional order to substantively improve the Job Creation Law by involving meaningful community participation, is not implemented. The government (in this case the President) actually uses the Job Creation Law instrument which substantively denies the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision. The legal implications of the Job Creation Law after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision have an impact on the law regarding the formation of statutory regulations, because after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's Decision a new concept was accommodated in the form of an omnibus law which had never previously been accommodated by Indonesia. Apart from that, the existence of non-compliance with the Job Creation Law with the Constitutional Decision of the Job Creation Court has the potential to give rise to the phenomenon of constitutional disobedience. Therefore, in the future, it is necessary to formulate the form and type of sanctions for Constitutional Court Decisions and also orientate the Constitutional Court to be able to carry out reviews of laws or laws that conflict with Constitutional Court Decisions.
Keywords:Legal Implications: Constitutional Court Decision, Job Creation Law.
Title: Eksistensi Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PPU-XVIII/2020
Description:
This study aims to find out and understand the existence of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020, and the legal meaning of the Job Creation Law after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PPU-XVIII/2020 in terms of legal certainty .
The research was carried out using normative research methods, using regulatory, conceptualization and case approaches.
The research results show that the existence of the Job Creation Law has an impact on the status of Constitutional Court Decision No.
91/PPU-XVIII/2020 between existence and absence.
It is said to exist because it is used as a juridical basis in the Job Creation Law, but substantively the decision of the Job Creation Constitutional Court, especially the constitutional order to substantively improve the Job Creation Law by involving meaningful community participation, is not implemented.
The government (in this case the President) actually uses the Job Creation Law instrument which substantively denies the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision.
The legal implications of the Job Creation Law after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's decision have an impact on the law regarding the formation of statutory regulations, because after the Job Creation Constitutional Court's Decision a new concept was accommodated in the form of an omnibus law which had never previously been accommodated by Indonesia.
Apart from that, the existence of non-compliance with the Job Creation Law with the Constitutional Decision of the Job Creation Court has the potential to give rise to the phenomenon of constitutional disobedience.
Therefore, in the future, it is necessary to formulate the form and type of sanctions for Constitutional Court Decisions and also orientate the Constitutional Court to be able to carry out reviews of laws or laws that conflict with Constitutional Court Decisions.
Keywords:Legal Implications: Constitutional Court Decision, Job Creation Law.
Related Results
TUGAS JURNAL SALMAN FARIS
TUGAS JURNAL SALMAN FARIS
Konstitusi merupakan hukum tertinggi dari suatu negara, Indonesia mempunyai Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 sebagai konstitusi tertulis negara. Berdasarkan...
KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGGUNAAN METODE OMNIBUS LAW SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGGUNAAN METODE OMNIBUS LAW SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2022 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Salah satu isu yang berkembang pada awal tahun 2020 yang lalu adalah digunakannya metode pembentukan undang-undang Omnibus Law yang telah memberlakukan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun...
Pembatasan Yudisial dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Memutus Sengketa Hasil Pilkada
Pembatasan Yudisial dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Memutus Sengketa Hasil Pilkada
AbstractThe Constitutional Court in Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022 stated that the authority to decide regional head election result dispute is the Constitutional Court’s original ...
KETIDAKPATUHAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 TENTANG UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA)
KETIDAKPATUHAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 TENTANG UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA)
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji ketidakpatuhan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII 2020 tentang Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. m...
“Menggugat” Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016
“Menggugat” Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016
Melalui Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016, Mahkamah Konstitusi menegaskan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak berwenang memberikan perluasan terhadap sebuah norma undang-undang atau membua...
Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dari Perspektif Teori Jhon Austin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU/XVII/2020
Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dari Perspektif Teori Jhon Austin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU/XVII/2020
Menjelang akhir tahun 2019 yang lalu, muncul suatu peristilahan yang asing dikalangan teoritisi maupun praktisi hukum di Indonesia secara umum, yaitu Omnibus Law. Peristilahan ters...
PERKEMBANGAN BARU TENTANG KONSTITUSI DSN KONSTITUSIONALISME DALAM TEORI DAN PRAKTIK
PERKEMBANGAN BARU TENTANG KONSTITUSI DSN KONSTITUSIONALISME DALAM TEORI DAN PRAKTIK
Buku ‘’Perkembangan Baru Tentang Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Dalam Teori dan Praktik’’ merupakan buku karya penulis yang telah cukup dikenal dikalangan akademisi huku...
JURNAL HTN YUSUF
JURNAL HTN YUSUF
Secara kelembagaan atau tata organisasi, keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai salah satu badan peradilan tidak berada di bawah Mahkamah Agung, sebagaimana badan-badan peradilan l...