Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fracture Resistance of Implant Abutments Following Abutment Alterations by Milling the Margins: An In Vitro Study
View through CrossRef
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different levels of preparation of an implant abutment on its fracture resistance. The study evaluated abutments that incorporated a platform switch (Myriad Plus Abutments, Morse Taper Connection) and Standard abutments (BioHorizons Standard Abutment, BioHorizons Inc). Each abutment was connected to an appropriate implant and mounted in a self-cured resin base. Based on the abutment preparation depths, 3 groups were created for each abutment type: as manufactured, abutment prepared 1 mm apical to the original margin, and abutment prepared 1.5 mm to the original margin. All the abutments were prepared in a standardized manner to incorporate a 0.5 mm chamfer margin uniformly. All the abutments were torqued to 30 Ncm on their respective implants. They were then subjected to loading until failure in a universal testing machine. Abutments with no preparation showed the maximum resistance to fracture for both groups. As the preparation depth increased, the fracture resistance decreased. The fracture resistance of implant abutment junction decreases as the preparation depth increases.
American Academy of Implant Dentistry
Title: Fracture Resistance of Implant Abutments Following Abutment Alterations by Milling the Margins: An In Vitro Study
Description:
This in vitro study evaluated the effect of different levels of preparation of an implant abutment on its fracture resistance.
The study evaluated abutments that incorporated a platform switch (Myriad Plus Abutments, Morse Taper Connection) and Standard abutments (BioHorizons Standard Abutment, BioHorizons Inc).
Each abutment was connected to an appropriate implant and mounted in a self-cured resin base.
Based on the abutment preparation depths, 3 groups were created for each abutment type: as manufactured, abutment prepared 1 mm apical to the original margin, and abutment prepared 1.
5 mm to the original margin.
All the abutments were prepared in a standardized manner to incorporate a 0.
5 mm chamfer margin uniformly.
All the abutments were torqued to 30 Ncm on their respective implants.
They were then subjected to loading until failure in a universal testing machine.
Abutments with no preparation showed the maximum resistance to fracture for both groups.
As the preparation depth increased, the fracture resistance decreased.
The fracture resistance of implant abutment junction decreases as the preparation depth increases.
Related Results
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental implants have become the most promising and accepted prosthetic alternative to missing teeth. Innovative and technological advances in implant dentistry have improved the pe...
Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments
Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Connection Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Abutments
The aim of the present in vitro study was to assess the modes of failures under static load among titanium (Ti) and 1- and 2-piece zirconia abutments. The 1- and 2-piece zirconia a...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents
Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents
ABSTRACT
Purpose
The desirable properties of a luting agent used for implant prostheses are adequate tensile strength for retention and at the same time render the crowns to be re...
REUSE OF THE INTRAOSSEOUS PART OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT (THE CLINICAL CASE)
REUSE OF THE INTRAOSSEOUS PART OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT (THE CLINICAL CASE)
Introduction. Replacement of a small included defect in the frontal area with a fixed structure based on the implant is the optimal solution. It is not always required to remove th...
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
Stochastic Propagation of Discrete Fracture Networks
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Abstract
Fractures are ubiquitous st...
Peri‐Implant Esthetics in Focus: Comparing Anodized Titanium and Zirconium Dioxide Abutments in a Randomized Clinical Trial
Peri‐Implant Esthetics in Focus: Comparing Anodized Titanium and Zirconium Dioxide Abutments in a Randomized Clinical Trial
ABSTRACT
Objective
Achieving optimal esthetics remains challenging due to limited comparative evidence between pink‐anodi...
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
AbstractPurpose: To measure and compare the retentive strength of cements specifically formulated for luting restorations onto implant abutments and to investigate the effect of va...

