Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Purpose The desirable properties of a luting agent used for implant prostheses are adequate tensile strength for retention and at the same time render the crowns to be retrievable. No studies have reported a comparison of the retention of implant crowns luted with zinc phosphate and polymeric cements. Studying the retentive abilities of these cements utilizing varying sizes of implant abutments may provide new insights into their clinical behaviors. Aim To compare the retentive abilities of two luting agents, using them to lute crowns on implant abutments of different diameters. Materials and methods Two implants (3.7 and 6.0 mm diameter) were embedded in a resin block. Straight abutments of corresponding diameters were screwed into the implants. The height of abutments was kept equal for both abutments (8 mm). Seven copings were fabricated for each abutment. Groups 1 and 2 copings (14 copings) were tested for both luting agents; zinc phosphate and polymeric cement using a universal testing machine. Results For the abutment diameters tested, the retentive values of zinc phosphate was significantly greater than polymeric implant cement. For the broad abutment, zinc phosphate was significantly more retentive than polymeric implant cement. For the narrow abutment, retentive values of zinc phosphate and polymeric implant cement were almost similar. Conclusion The retentive values of zinc phosphate were significantly greater than polymeric implant cement. For broad abutment, zinc phosphate was more retentive whereas for narrow abutment, retentive values were almost similar. How to cite this article Matani JD, Parulekar N, Kheur M, Jambhekar S, Supriya MK. Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;2(3):96-100.
Title: Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents
Description:
ABSTRACT Purpose The desirable properties of a luting agent used for implant prostheses are adequate tensile strength for retention and at the same time render the crowns to be retrievable.
No studies have reported a comparison of the retention of implant crowns luted with zinc phosphate and polymeric cements.
Studying the retentive abilities of these cements utilizing varying sizes of implant abutments may provide new insights into their clinical behaviors.
Aim To compare the retentive abilities of two luting agents, using them to lute crowns on implant abutments of different diameters.
Materials and methods Two implants (3.
7 and 6.
0 mm diameter) were embedded in a resin block.
Straight abutments of corresponding diameters were screwed into the implants.
The height of abutments was kept equal for both abutments (8 mm).
Seven copings were fabricated for each abutment.
Groups 1 and 2 copings (14 copings) were tested for both luting agents; zinc phosphate and polymeric cement using a universal testing machine.
Results For the abutment diameters tested, the retentive values of zinc phosphate was significantly greater than polymeric implant cement.
For the broad abutment, zinc phosphate was significantly more retentive than polymeric implant cement.
For the narrow abutment, retentive values of zinc phosphate and polymeric implant cement were almost similar.
Conclusion The retentive values of zinc phosphate were significantly greater than polymeric implant cement.
For broad abutment, zinc phosphate was more retentive whereas for narrow abutment, retentive values were almost similar.
How to cite this article Matani JD, Parulekar N, Kheur M, Jambhekar S, Supriya MK.
Retention of Metal Crowns Luted to Implant Abutments of Two Different Diameters using Different Luting Agents.
Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2012;2(3):96-100.

Related Results

Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
Cement Selection for Implant‐Supported Crowns Fabricated with Different Luting Space Settings
AbstractPurpose: To measure and compare the retentive strength of cements specifically formulated for luting restorations onto implant abutments and to investigate the effect of va...
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental implants have become the most promising and accepted prosthetic alternative to missing teeth. Innovative and technological advances in implant dentistry have improved the pe...
The Performance of PEKK vs Zirconia Abutments for Screw-Retained Crowns in Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: An in vitro Study
The Performance of PEKK vs Zirconia Abutments for Screw-Retained Crowns in Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: An in vitro Study
This study aimed to compare the in vitro performance of anterior and posterior crowns with screw-retained polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) or zirconia abutments on two-piece zirconia i...
A comprehensive review on bonding between monolithic ceramics and tooth structure with different adhesive agents.
A comprehensive review on bonding between monolithic ceramics and tooth structure with different adhesive agents.
Reliable bonding between the prepared tooth and monolithic ceramics can be achieved by various luting agents available on the market. The selection of luting agent and cementation ...
ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF DENTAL LUTING CEMENTS INVESTIGATED BY IMPEDANCE METHODOLOGY RELATED TO THEIR POROSITIES AND SOLUBILITY
ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF DENTAL LUTING CEMENTS INVESTIGATED BY IMPEDANCE METHODOLOGY RELATED TO THEIR POROSITIES AND SOLUBILITY
The electrical resistance property of dental cement is one of important physical properties. Most previous studies aimed to investigate the mechanical properties, solubility and es...

Back to Top