Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Management of COMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study of drain placement practices in colorectal surgery

View through CrossRef
AbstractAimPostoperative drains have historically been used for the prevention and early detection of intra‐abdominal collections. However, current evidence suggests that prophylactic drain placement following colorectal surgery has no significant clinical benefit. This is reflected in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, which recommend against their routine use. The Ileus Management International study found more than one‐third of participating centres across the world routinely used drains in the majority of colorectal resections. The aim of the present study is to audit international compliance with ERAS guidelines regarding the use of postoperative drains in colorectal surgery.MethodThis prospective, multicentre audit will be conducted via the student‐ and trainee‐led EuroSurg Collaborative network across Europe, South Africa and Australasia. Data will be collected on consecutive patients undergoing elective and emergency colorectal surgery with 30‐day follow‐up. This will include any colorectal resection, formation of colostomy/ileostomy and reversal of stoma. The primary end‐point will be adherence to ERAS guidelines for intra‐abdominal drain placement. Secondary outcomes will include the following: time to diagnosis of intra‐abdominal postoperative collections; output and time to removal of drains; and 30‐day postoperative complications defined by the Clavien–Dindo classification.ConclusionThis protocol describes the methodology for the first international audit of intra‐abdominal drain placement after colorectal surgery. The study will be conducted across a large collaborative network with quality assurance and data validation strategies. This will provide a clear understanding of current practice and novel evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of intra‐abdominal drain placement in colorectal surgical patients.
Title: Management of COMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study of drain placement practices in colorectal surgery
Description:
AbstractAimPostoperative drains have historically been used for the prevention and early detection of intra‐abdominal collections.
However, current evidence suggests that prophylactic drain placement following colorectal surgery has no significant clinical benefit.
This is reflected in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines, which recommend against their routine use.
The Ileus Management International study found more than one‐third of participating centres across the world routinely used drains in the majority of colorectal resections.
The aim of the present study is to audit international compliance with ERAS guidelines regarding the use of postoperative drains in colorectal surgery.
MethodThis prospective, multicentre audit will be conducted via the student‐ and trainee‐led EuroSurg Collaborative network across Europe, South Africa and Australasia.
Data will be collected on consecutive patients undergoing elective and emergency colorectal surgery with 30‐day follow‐up.
This will include any colorectal resection, formation of colostomy/ileostomy and reversal of stoma.
The primary end‐point will be adherence to ERAS guidelines for intra‐abdominal drain placement.
Secondary outcomes will include the following: time to diagnosis of intra‐abdominal postoperative collections; output and time to removal of drains; and 30‐day postoperative complications defined by the Clavien–Dindo classification.
ConclusionThis protocol describes the methodology for the first international audit of intra‐abdominal drain placement after colorectal surgery.
The study will be conducted across a large collaborative network with quality assurance and data validation strategies.
This will provide a clear understanding of current practice and novel evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of intra‐abdominal drain placement in colorectal surgical patients.

Related Results

Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
AbstractAimIntraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the ...
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Intra–abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients after emergency abdominal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and patient outcome
Background and Objectives: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently encountered in patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery and is associated with adverse outc...
Perbedaan cost-effectiveness pengangkatan drain kurang dari 3 hari dengan lebih dari 3 hari pada modified radical mastectomy
Perbedaan cost-effectiveness pengangkatan drain kurang dari 3 hari dengan lebih dari 3 hari pada modified radical mastectomy
Introduction: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a therapeutic choice for operable breast cancer. The most frequent post-surgery complication is seroma formation, and this can be...
A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain
A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered the Gold-standard for the management of benign gallbladder disease. With increasing surgeon experience and advance...
A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain
A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered the Gold-standard for the management of benign gallbladder disease. With increasing surgeon experience and advance...
Management of a iatrogenic cecal perforation after abdominal drain placement on a horse
Management of a iatrogenic cecal perforation after abdominal drain placement on a horse
Summary: A 16-year-old, French Saddlebred was referred for colic signs, diagnosed with incarceration of the jejunum in a mesoduodenic rent and subsequently treated surgically (with...

Back to Top