Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain

View through CrossRef
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered the Gold-standard for the management of benign gallbladder disease. With increasing surgeon experience and advancement of instrumentations and equipment, LC is approaching continuously toward a more safe and less invasive technique. There is a consensus that drainage should not be considered mandatory or standard after elective LC. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of the LC without abdominal drain over sub hepatic drainage and to compare the post-operative outcome between two groups. Materials and Methods: A descriptive observational comparison study has been carried out in the department of General Surgery BSMCH, from September 1, to December 1, in 130 patients undergoing elective LC. Patients have been divided into two groups: Comparison group and study group after proper matching. Data have been collected via interview, clinical examination, and scrutinizing relevant medical records. Each patient has been followed up after operation. Data have been summarized for estimating various parameters such as mean duration of surgery and hospital stay between the groups and proportion of patient complaining of pain 24 h after surgery. Results: The mean duration of surgery in drainage group is 108 min which is significantly more than the non-drainage group 88 min. In this present study, the patients with abdominal drain are showing more incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) 21.53% compared to no-drain group 6.15%. In this study, 35.38% of patients with subhepatic drain developed pain after surgery, whereas only 12.3% of the patients with no drain experienced the same. Overall six patients from the drain group still had significant subhepatic collection and eight patients with no drain have the same. The mean duration of stay in hospital of the drain group is 4.06 days, whereas, in no-drain group, it is 2.26. Conclusion: An uncomplicated gallstone disease can be treated by LC without need for drain with reasonable safety by an experienced surgeon. Hence, no use of drain scores over use of drain in terms of PONV, post-operative pain, and therefore, there is less use of analgesics and also short duration of hospital stay. When a dry operative field is achieved during LC the drain insertion may be avoided.
Title: A comparative study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drain
Description:
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been considered the Gold-standard for the management of benign gallbladder disease.
With increasing surgeon experience and advancement of instrumentations and equipment, LC is approaching continuously toward a more safe and less invasive technique.
There is a consensus that drainage should not be considered mandatory or standard after elective LC.
Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of the LC without abdominal drain over sub hepatic drainage and to compare the post-operative outcome between two groups.
Materials and Methods: A descriptive observational comparison study has been carried out in the department of General Surgery BSMCH, from September 1, to December 1, in 130 patients undergoing elective LC.
Patients have been divided into two groups: Comparison group and study group after proper matching.
Data have been collected via interview, clinical examination, and scrutinizing relevant medical records.
Each patient has been followed up after operation.
Data have been summarized for estimating various parameters such as mean duration of surgery and hospital stay between the groups and proportion of patient complaining of pain 24 h after surgery.
Results: The mean duration of surgery in drainage group is 108 min which is significantly more than the non-drainage group 88 min.
In this present study, the patients with abdominal drain are showing more incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) 21.
53% compared to no-drain group 6.
15%.
In this study, 35.
38% of patients with subhepatic drain developed pain after surgery, whereas only 12.
3% of the patients with no drain experienced the same.
Overall six patients from the drain group still had significant subhepatic collection and eight patients with no drain have the same.
The mean duration of stay in hospital of the drain group is 4.
06 days, whereas, in no-drain group, it is 2.
26.
Conclusion: An uncomplicated gallstone disease can be treated by LC without need for drain with reasonable safety by an experienced surgeon.
Hence, no use of drain scores over use of drain in terms of PONV, post-operative pain, and therefore, there is less use of analgesics and also short duration of hospital stay.
When a dry operative field is achieved during LC the drain insertion may be avoided.

Related Results

OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH &WITHOUT DRAIN
OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH &WITHOUT DRAIN
BACKGROUND: Cholecystitis is common health problem and laparoscopic approach to gallstonedisease is procedure of choice. Intra abdominal drain is used to pervert post operative sub...
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Prevalence of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury Following Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Treatment Outcomes
Background and Aim:Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) continue to be a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. The prevalence of iatrogenic IBDI increased with the laparosc...
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Surgical strategies in the laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common duct stones
Background:  The purpose of the present study was to examine the current approach and different strategies adopted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Germany.Methods:  A retrospec...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY-A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
DRAIN VERSUS NO DRAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY-A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
INTRODUCTION Gallstones are the most common conditions encountered in surgical OPD. The prevalence rose with age, except in women of 40-49 years, so that at 60-69 years, 22.4% of w...
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Background: Acute cholecystitis, which is typically associated with gallstones, is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen presenting in emergency departments around the wor...

Back to Top