Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
View through CrossRef
AbstractAimIntraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery.MethodCOMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time‐to‐diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30‐day major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo III–V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement.ResultsSome 725 patients (median age 68.0 years; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48–5.02, p = 0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.61–1.90, p = 0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67–2.36, p = 0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91–1.36, p = 0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.87–2.99, p = 0.128).ConclusionThis is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery.
Title: Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study
Description:
AbstractAimIntraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery.
However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use.
This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery.
MethodCOMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020).
The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement.
Secondary outcomes included rate and time‐to‐diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30‐day major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo III–V).
Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement.
ResultsSome 725 patients (median age 68.
0 years; 349 [48.
1%] women) from 22 countries were included.
The drain insertion rate was 53.
7% (389 patients).
Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.
56, 95% CI: 0.
48–5.
02, p = 0.
457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.
07, 95% CI: 0.
61–1.
90, p = 0.
805) of collections.
Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.
26, 95% CI: 0.
67–2.
36, p = 0.
478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.
11, 95% CI: 0.
91–1.
36, p = 0.
303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.
61, 95% CI: 0.
87–2.
99, p = 0.
128).
ConclusionThis is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery.
The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain.
Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery.
Related Results
Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
Abstract
Background
Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced re...
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Proceedings of the Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine 2026 Conference - Selected Abstracts
Welcome to this issue of Panorama of Emergency Medicine (POEM) dedicated to the 10th Qatar Paediatric Emergency Medicine (Q-PEM) International Conference which was organised and ho...
Management of COMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study of drain placement practices in colorectal surgery
Management of COMPlicAted intra‐abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study of drain placement practices in colorectal surgery
AbstractAimPostoperative drains have historically been used for the prevention and early detection of intra‐abdominal collections. However, current evidence suggests that prophylac...
Cohort studies
Cohort studies
A cohort study is one in which the outcome (usually disease status) is ascertained for groups of individuals defined on the basis of their exposure. At the time exposure status is ...
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
The Burden of Road Traffic Injuries: A Global Perspective
Introduction Road Traffic Injury (RTI) pose a significant health challenge. It represents the eighth leading cause of death globally, prompting the UN to designate 2011-2020 as...
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract A13: Applied the proteomics characteristics to detect the inherited colorectal adenomas
Abstract
Introduction: Current study found that about one-third of the incidence of colorectal cancer have genetic related. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer...
Perbedaan cost-effectiveness pengangkatan drain kurang dari 3 hari dengan lebih dari 3 hari pada modified radical mastectomy
Perbedaan cost-effectiveness pengangkatan drain kurang dari 3 hari dengan lebih dari 3 hari pada modified radical mastectomy
Introduction: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is a therapeutic choice for operable breast cancer. The most frequent post-surgery complication is seroma formation, and this can be...
Intraperitoneal-Free Cancer Cells Represent a Major Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Intraperitoneal-Free Cancer Cells Represent a Major Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
BACKGROUND:
Intraperitoneal-free cancer cells are considered as an important prognostic tool in gastric and ovarian cancer. However, their significance in colorectal ca...

