Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
View through CrossRef
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting.
Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each. Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.v., Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.v. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed.
Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting. However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron.
Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Pharmamedix India Publication Pvt Ltd
Title: Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Description:
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section.
Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced by patients undergoing cesarean section.
Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of dexamethasone, ondansetron, and palonosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting.
Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted on total 90 patients undergoing cesarean section, divided in three groups of 30 patients each.
Group O received 4 mg ondansetron i.
v.
, Group P received palonosetron 075 mg i.
v and Group D received 8 mg dexamethasone i.
v.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting was compared between the groups and side effects were assessed.
Results: Antiemetic prophylaxis reduced the overall incidence of nausea and vomiting.
However, Palonosetron had a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting as compared to dexamethasone and ondansetron.
Conclusion: Our study concluded that Palonosetron had the lowest incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Related Results
Daily palonosetron is superior to ondansetron in the prevention of delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia
Daily palonosetron is superior to ondansetron in the prevention of delayed chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia
AbstractBACKGROUND:Nausea and vomiting in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) can be from various causes, including the use of high‐dose cytarabine.METHODS:The authors c...
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
16510 Background: Preparative regimens for BMT are associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting, which can negatively affect quality of life. It is important to evaluat...
Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols
Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent and distressing complications following abdominal surgery, affecting up to seventy percent of high-risk patients. ...
Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The practice of antiemetic prophylaxis within the prevention and management of postoperative nausea...
A comparative study of Lichtenstein hernioplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia in treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia
A comparative study of Lichtenstein hernioplasty performed under spinal anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia in treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia
Background: Lichtenstein mesh repair technique is widely used throughout the world in inguinal hernia repair. Hernioplasty done under local anaesthesia certainly has some benefits ...
A Review of Ondansetron in the Management of Radiotherapy-Induced Emesis
A Review of Ondansetron in the Management of Radiotherapy-Induced Emesis
This paper reviews experience with ondansetron in radiotherapy-induced emesis. The efficacy of ondansetron is assessed following a number of different radiotherapy regimens: single...
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Introduction. One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia. The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and m...
Awareness About Spinal Anaesthesia Among Dental Students
Awareness About Spinal Anaesthesia Among Dental Students
Spinal anaesthesia is administered in the lumbar spinal region and utilized for surgeries, including the lower midsection, pelvis and lower extremities. Spinal anaesthesia is acted...

