Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Background: The practice of antiemetic prophylaxis within the prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting is important for optimal care of surgical patients. The poor practice of antiemetic prophylaxis on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention come up with complications, reduce patient satisfaction, and increase overall costs. This study aims to assess practice and associated factors of antiemetic prophylaxis among health professionals in referral hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia. Method and materials: Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted on 407 health professionals from February 27 to March 30, 2019, in referral Hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select the study participants. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the antiemetic prophylaxis practice level of health professionals on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and management. The p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: In this study 153 (37.6%) of health professionals were practicing antiemetic prophylaxis. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that anesthetists were (AOR: 8.11; 95% CI: 3.27, 20.08) and physicians (AOR: 4.78; 95% CI: 2.46, 9.30) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared with midwives. Learning in academic classes (AOR: 3.83; 95% CI: 1.46, 10.09), took training (AOR: 6.97; 95% CI: 2.208, 22.021), professionals who said that there are enough anti-emetic drugs available (AOR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.67, 5.77), professionals, who respond that patients can afford to buy antiemetic’s (AOR: 3.56; 95% CI: 1.23, 10.32) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared to their counterparts. Conclusions: Less than fifty percent (37.6%) of health Professionals practice antiemetic prophylaxis. Type of Profession, learning, training, availability, and cost of antiemetic drugs were factors significantly affecting the practice of antiemetic prophylaxis. Highlights:
Title: Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Description:
ABSTRACT Background: The practice of antiemetic prophylaxis within the prevention and management of postoperative nausea and vomiting is important for optimal care of surgical patients.
The poor practice of antiemetic prophylaxis on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention come up with complications, reduce patient satisfaction, and increase overall costs.
This study aims to assess practice and associated factors of antiemetic prophylaxis among health professionals in referral hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia.
Method and materials: Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted on 407 health professionals from February 27 to March 30, 2019, in referral Hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia.
A stratified random sampling technique was used to select the study participants.
A structured questionnaire was used to collect data.
Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the antiemetic prophylaxis practice level of health professionals on postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention and management.
The p-values of < 0.
05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: In this study 153 (37.
6%) of health professionals were practicing antiemetic prophylaxis.
The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that anesthetists were (AOR: 8.
11; 95% CI: 3.
27, 20.
08) and physicians (AOR: 4.
78; 95% CI: 2.
46, 9.
30) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared with midwives.
Learning in academic classes (AOR: 3.
83; 95% CI: 1.
46, 10.
09), took training (AOR: 6.
97; 95% CI: 2.
208, 22.
021), professionals who said that there are enough anti-emetic drugs available (AOR: 3.
10; 95% CI: 1.
67, 5.
77), professionals, who respond that patients can afford to buy antiemetic’s (AOR: 3.
56; 95% CI: 1.
23, 10.
32) were more likely to give anti-emetic prophylaxis as compared to their counterparts.
Conclusions: Less than fifty percent (37.
6%) of health Professionals practice antiemetic prophylaxis.
Type of Profession, learning, training, availability, and cost of antiemetic drugs were factors significantly affecting the practice of antiemetic prophylaxis.
Highlights:.

Related Results

SISTEM RUJUKAN DALAM SISTEM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN MATERNAL PERINATAL DI INDONESIA
SISTEM RUJUKAN DALAM SISTEM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN MATERNAL PERINATAL DI INDONESIA
ABSTRAK Kasus keterlambatan rujukan merupakan salah satu permasalahan utama terjadinya kematian ibu dan bayi di Indonesia. Kematian ibu dan bayi dapat diakibatkan pelayanan d...
Prevalence and factors associated with vitamin K prophylaxis utilization among neonates in rural Ethiopia in 2016
Prevalence and factors associated with vitamin K prophylaxis utilization among neonates in rural Ethiopia in 2016
Abstract Background Neonatal Mortality Ratio (NMR) could not be reversed sufficiently in Ethiopia in the last couple of years. Neonatal bleeding is ...
Exploring the association between medical marijuana cardholder status and antiemetic overuse.
Exploring the association between medical marijuana cardholder status and antiemetic overuse.
e18812 Background: The conscientious prescribing of antiemetics by chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) risk was highlighted in the American Society of Clinical Oncolog...

Back to Top