Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
View through CrossRef
Introduction. One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia. The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and may be related to surgical intervention, decrease in blood pressure, vagal excitation, and oxytocin administration.The objective was to compare and estimate the efficacy of intravenous injections of ondansetron, pyridoxine and metoclopramide in inhibiting emesis prophylactically in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.Materials and methods. This study included 100 pregnant females in the last term without significant concomitant pathology of ASA grades I and II. Patients were randomly allocated into three drug groups and a control group. Each group consisted of 25 patients: the ondansetron group (4 mg intravenously), the metoclopramide group (10 mg intravenously), the pyridoxine group (100 mg intravenously), and the placebo group or the control group (normal saline - 2 ml intravenously). During the study, nausea and vomiting occurred during and after surgery, in addition to any additional adverse effects. Statistical software (SPSS 20.0) was used for statistical data analysis.Results. The incidence of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the placebo group (40% and 32%) compared with the ondansetron group (4% and 8%), the metoclopramide group (8% and 16%), and the pyridoxine group (20% and 24%). Signs of gastrointestinal disorders were more pronounced in the pyridoxine group compared with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery was high in the placebo group and statistically significant compared with the ondansetron group (p = 0.0232), there was no statistically significant difference with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.Conclusion. According to the results of the study, ondansetron and metoclopramide were more effective in reducing nausea and vomiting than pyridoxine and placebo. Ondansetron was significantly more effective for prevention of both intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia
Title: Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Description:
Introduction.
One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia.
The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and may be related to surgical intervention, decrease in blood pressure, vagal excitation, and oxytocin administration.
The objective was to compare and estimate the efficacy of intravenous injections of ondansetron, pyridoxine and metoclopramide in inhibiting emesis prophylactically in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Materials and methods.
This study included 100 pregnant females in the last term without significant concomitant pathology of ASA grades I and II.
Patients were randomly allocated into three drug groups and a control group.
Each group consisted of 25 patients: the ondansetron group (4 mg intravenously), the metoclopramide group (10 mg intravenously), the pyridoxine group (100 mg intravenously), and the placebo group or the control group (normal saline - 2 ml intravenously).
During the study, nausea and vomiting occurred during and after surgery, in addition to any additional adverse effects.
Statistical software (SPSS 20.
0) was used for statistical data analysis.
Results.
The incidence of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the placebo group (40% and 32%) compared with the ondansetron group (4% and 8%), the metoclopramide group (8% and 16%), and the pyridoxine group (20% and 24%).
Signs of gastrointestinal disorders were more pronounced in the pyridoxine group compared with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery was high in the placebo group and statistically significant compared with the ondansetron group (p = 0.
0232), there was no statistically significant difference with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.
Conclusion.
According to the results of the study, ondansetron and metoclopramide were more effective in reducing nausea and vomiting than pyridoxine and placebo.
Ondansetron was significantly more effective for prevention of both intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Torsades de Pointes Following Ondansetron Administration: A Case Report with literature review
Torsades de Pointes Following Ondansetron Administration: A Case Report with literature review
Abstract
Introduction
Ondansetron blocks human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium channels, causing QT prolongation and risk of torsades de pointes (TdP). Despite its wide...
“A Comparative Study of Intravenous Ondansetron and Palonosetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”
“A Comparative Study of Intravenous Ondansetron and Palonosetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remain among the most common and distressing complications following anesthesia and surgery, particularly after laparoscopic ch...
Comparison of Oral Ondansetron and Metoclopramide in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Procedures
Comparison of Oral Ondansetron and Metoclopramide in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Procedures
Background: Postoperative vomiting and nausea frequently occur after gynecological laparoscopic surgeries, adversely affecting rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. Although met...
Comparison of Antiemetic Use Ondansetron and Metoclopramide, Evaluation of Effectiveness and Adverse Effects
Comparison of Antiemetic Use Ondansetron and Metoclopramide, Evaluation of Effectiveness and Adverse Effects
Ondansetron and metoclopramide are the most often used antiemetics in clinics. According to the Indonesian National Formulary, ondansetron is exclusively approved for the preventio...
“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
“A Prospective Study On Complication During Spinal Anesthesia In Elective General Surgical Procedures”
Background of the Study: Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly employed regional anesthetic techniques for elective surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen, pelvis,...
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate if addition of metoclopramide to the triplet antiemetic therapy is superior to the trip...
Comparison of metoclopramide–dexamethasone combination and metoclopramide alone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Comparison of metoclopramide–dexamethasone combination and metoclopramide alone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an important concern in laparoscopic surgeries. Aim of this study is to identify the role of metoclopramide...

