Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
View through CrossRef
Introduction. One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia. The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and may be related to surgical intervention, decrease in blood pressure, vagal excitation, and oxytocin administration.The objective was to compare and estimate the efficacy of intravenous injections of ondansetron, pyridoxine and metoclopramide in inhibiting emesis prophylactically in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.Materials and methods. This study included 100 pregnant females in the last term without significant concomitant pathology of ASA grades I and II. Patients were randomly allocated into three drug groups and a control group. Each group consisted of 25 patients: the ondansetron group (4 mg intravenously), the metoclopramide group (10 mg intravenously), the pyridoxine group (100 mg intravenously), and the placebo group or the control group (normal saline - 2 ml intravenously). During the study, nausea and vomiting occurred during and after surgery, in addition to any additional adverse effects. Statistical software (SPSS 20.0) was used for statistical data analysis.Results. The incidence of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the placebo group (40% and 32%) compared with the ondansetron group (4% and 8%), the metoclopramide group (8% and 16%), and the pyridoxine group (20% and 24%). Signs of gastrointestinal disorders were more pronounced in the pyridoxine group compared with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups. The incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery was high in the placebo group and statistically significant compared with the ondansetron group (p = 0.0232), there was no statistically significant difference with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.Conclusion. According to the results of the study, ondansetron and metoclopramide were more effective in reducing nausea and vomiting than pyridoxine and placebo. Ondansetron was significantly more effective for prevention of both intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
FSBEI HE I.P. Pavlov SPbSMU MOH Russia
Title: Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Description:
Introduction.
One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia.
The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and may be related to surgical intervention, decrease in blood pressure, vagal excitation, and oxytocin administration.
The objective was to compare and estimate the efficacy of intravenous injections of ondansetron, pyridoxine and metoclopramide in inhibiting emesis prophylactically in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Materials and methods.
This study included 100 pregnant females in the last term without significant concomitant pathology of ASA grades I and II.
Patients were randomly allocated into three drug groups and a control group.
Each group consisted of 25 patients: the ondansetron group (4 mg intravenously), the metoclopramide group (10 mg intravenously), the pyridoxine group (100 mg intravenously), and the placebo group or the control group (normal saline - 2 ml intravenously).
During the study, nausea and vomiting occurred during and after surgery, in addition to any additional adverse effects.
Statistical software (SPSS 20.
0) was used for statistical data analysis.
Results.
The incidence of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the placebo group (40% and 32%) compared with the ondansetron group (4% and 8%), the metoclopramide group (8% and 16%), and the pyridoxine group (20% and 24%).
Signs of gastrointestinal disorders were more pronounced in the pyridoxine group compared with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.
The incidence of nausea and vomiting after surgery was high in the placebo group and statistically significant compared with the ondansetron group (p = 0.
0232), there was no statistically significant difference with the metoclopramide and ondansetron groups.
Conclusion.
According to the results of the study, ondansetron and metoclopramide were more effective in reducing nausea and vomiting than pyridoxine and placebo.
Ondansetron was significantly more effective for prevention of both intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate if addition of metoclopramide to the triplet antiemetic therapy is superior to the trip...
Comparison of metoclopramide–dexamethasone combination and metoclopramide alone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Comparison of metoclopramide–dexamethasone combination and metoclopramide alone for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea vomiting in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is an important concern in laparoscopic surgeries. Aim of this study is to identify the role of metoclopramide...
PREOPERATIVE ONDANSETRON VERSUS METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF NAUSEAAND VOMITING IN ELECTIVE LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION (LSCS) UNDER SPINALANAESTHESIA
PREOPERATIVE ONDANSETRON VERSUS METOCLOPRAMIDE FOR PREVENTION OF NAUSEAAND VOMITING IN ELECTIVE LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION (LSCS) UNDER SPINALANAESTHESIA
INTRODUCTION: Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) are the most common distressing symptom after LSCS. Antiemetic drugs play
an important role to prevent it. Though many drugs...
INCIDENCE OF POST DURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MEDIAN VERSUS PARAMEDIAN APPROACH TO SUB-ARACHNOID SPACE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION
INCIDENCE OF POST DURAL PUNCTURE HEADACHE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MEDIAN VERSUS PARAMEDIAN APPROACH TO SUB-ARACHNOID SPACE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION
Background: Post dural puncture headache is the common complication after spinal anesthesia due to puncture of dura matter. This complication is frequent in Obstetric patients who ...
Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Comparative evaluation of ondansetron, palonosetron, and dexamethasone for antiemetic prophylaxis in cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most common regional anesthesia used to provide surgical anesthesia for cesarean section. Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms experienced b...
Comparison of the Prophylactic Effect of Propofol, Dexamethasone and Ondansetron on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
Comparison of the Prophylactic Effect of Propofol, Dexamethasone and Ondansetron on Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
Nausea, and vomiting are common complications in women undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. This study aimed to compare the propofol, dexamethasone, and ondansetron ...
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
16510 Background: Preparative regimens for BMT are associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting, which can negatively affect quality of life. It is important to evaluat...

