Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols

View through CrossRef
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent and distressing complications following abdominal surgery, affecting up to seventy percent of high-risk patients. Despite multiple antiemetic options, optimal prophylaxis remains undefined in many settings. Objective: To compare the efficacy of three pharmacologic antiemetic regimens in preventing PONV in adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery. Methods: In this prospective study at Lahore General Hospital (January–December 2024), sixty patients aged 18–65 years were randomized into three groups (n=20 each). Group A received dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction. Group B received dexamethasone (8 mg) and palonosetron (0.075 mg) IV at induction. Group C received aprepitant (40 mg PO) two hours preoperatively plus dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction. PONV incidence, severity, vomiting episodes, and rescue antiemetic use were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests with p < 0.05. Results: Baseline characteristics including mean age (40.6 ± 12.4 yr), BMI (25.7 ± 4.2 kg/m²), gender distribution, smoking status, and Apfel scores were comparable across groups. Group C achieved the highest rate of no PONV (55%) and lowest rescue antiemetic requirement (5%), significantly outperforming Group A (25% none; 35% rescue; p < 0.01) and Group B (45% none; 20% rescue; p < 0.05). Severe nausea occurred in 10% of Group A, none in Group B, and 5% in Group C. Mean vomiting episodes were similar across groups. No adverse events related to antiemetic therapy occurred. Conclusion: A multimodal regimen of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone provides superior PONV prophylaxis compared to dual-agent protocols in elective abdominal surgery patients. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone also showed substantial efficacy and could serve as an alternative.
Developmental Medico-Life-Sciences Research and Publications (SMC-Private) Limited
Title: Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols
Description:
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent and distressing complications following abdominal surgery, affecting up to seventy percent of high-risk patients.
Despite multiple antiemetic options, optimal prophylaxis remains undefined in many settings.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of three pharmacologic antiemetic regimens in preventing PONV in adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
Methods: In this prospective study at Lahore General Hospital (January–December 2024), sixty patients aged 18–65 years were randomized into three groups (n=20 each).
Group A received dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction.
Group B received dexamethasone (8 mg) and palonosetron (0.
075 mg) IV at induction.
Group C received aprepitant (40 mg PO) two hours preoperatively plus dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction.
PONV incidence, severity, vomiting episodes, and rescue antiemetic use were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively.
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests with p < 0.
05.
Results: Baseline characteristics including mean age (40.
6 ± 12.
4 yr), BMI (25.
7 ± 4.
2 kg/m²), gender distribution, smoking status, and Apfel scores were comparable across groups.
Group C achieved the highest rate of no PONV (55%) and lowest rescue antiemetic requirement (5%), significantly outperforming Group A (25% none; 35% rescue; p < 0.
01) and Group B (45% none; 20% rescue; p < 0.
05).
Severe nausea occurred in 10% of Group A, none in Group B, and 5% in Group C.
Mean vomiting episodes were similar across groups.
No adverse events related to antiemetic therapy occurred.
Conclusion: A multimodal regimen of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone provides superior PONV prophylaxis compared to dual-agent protocols in elective abdominal surgery patients.
Palonosetron plus dexamethasone also showed substantial efficacy and could serve as an alternative.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
16510 Background: Preparative regimens for BMT are associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting, which can negatively affect quality of life. It is important to evaluat...
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
Background: Ginger has long been used as an antiemetic herb in various systems for traditional medicine. However, lack of data on its utility in preventing chemotherapy induced vom...

Back to Top