Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols
View through CrossRef
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent and distressing complications following abdominal surgery, affecting up to seventy percent of high-risk patients. Despite multiple antiemetic options, optimal prophylaxis remains undefined in many settings.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of three pharmacologic antiemetic regimens in preventing PONV in adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
Methods: In this prospective study at Lahore General Hospital (January–December 2024), sixty patients aged 18–65 years were randomized into three groups (n=20 each). Group A received dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction. Group B received dexamethasone (8 mg) and palonosetron (0.075 mg) IV at induction. Group C received aprepitant (40 mg PO) two hours preoperatively plus dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction. PONV incidence, severity, vomiting episodes, and rescue antiemetic use were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests with p < 0.05.
Results: Baseline characteristics including mean age (40.6 ± 12.4 yr), BMI (25.7 ± 4.2 kg/m²), gender distribution, smoking status, and Apfel scores were comparable across groups. Group C achieved the highest rate of no PONV (55%) and lowest rescue antiemetic requirement (5%), significantly outperforming Group A (25% none; 35% rescue; p < 0.01) and Group B (45% none; 20% rescue; p < 0.05). Severe nausea occurred in 10% of Group A, none in Group B, and 5% in Group C. Mean vomiting episodes were similar across groups. No adverse events related to antiemetic therapy occurred.
Conclusion: A multimodal regimen of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone provides superior PONV prophylaxis compared to dual-agent protocols in elective abdominal surgery patients. Palonosetron plus dexamethasone also showed substantial efficacy and could serve as an alternative.
Developmental Medico-Life-Sciences Research and Publications (SMC-Private) Limited
Title: Pharmacological Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Abdominal Surgery: Efficacy of Antiemetic Protocols
Description:
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequent and distressing complications following abdominal surgery, affecting up to seventy percent of high-risk patients.
Despite multiple antiemetic options, optimal prophylaxis remains undefined in many settings.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of three pharmacologic antiemetic regimens in preventing PONV in adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
Methods: In this prospective study at Lahore General Hospital (January–December 2024), sixty patients aged 18–65 years were randomized into three groups (n=20 each).
Group A received dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction.
Group B received dexamethasone (8 mg) and palonosetron (0.
075 mg) IV at induction.
Group C received aprepitant (40 mg PO) two hours preoperatively plus dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) IV at induction.
PONV incidence, severity, vomiting episodes, and rescue antiemetic use were recorded for 24 hours postoperatively.
Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Chi-square tests with p < 0.
05.
Results: Baseline characteristics including mean age (40.
6 ± 12.
4 yr), BMI (25.
7 ± 4.
2 kg/m²), gender distribution, smoking status, and Apfel scores were comparable across groups.
Group C achieved the highest rate of no PONV (55%) and lowest rescue antiemetic requirement (5%), significantly outperforming Group A (25% none; 35% rescue; p < 0.
01) and Group B (45% none; 20% rescue; p < 0.
05).
Severe nausea occurred in 10% of Group A, none in Group B, and 5% in Group C.
Mean vomiting episodes were similar across groups.
No adverse events related to antiemetic therapy occurred.
Conclusion: A multimodal regimen of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone provides superior PONV prophylaxis compared to dual-agent protocols in elective abdominal surgery patients.
Palonosetron plus dexamethasone also showed substantial efficacy and could serve as an alternative.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting in Africa among patient under gone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting in Africa among patient under gone surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background:
Patients who experience postoperative nausea and vomiting are not happy with their surgical outcomes. Preventing this problem expedites the patients’ return...
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Antiemetic Prophylaxis Practice and its Associated Factors Among Health Professionals in Referral Hospitals of North West Ethiopia: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The practice of antiemetic prophylaxis within the prevention and management of postoperative nausea...
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
Use of palonosetron 0.25 mg IV daily and incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT)
16510 Background: Preparative regimens for BMT are associated with a high incidence of nausea and vomiting, which can negatively affect quality of life. It is important to evaluat...
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Addition of Metoclopramide to Triple Antiemetic Therapy Towards Prevention of Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients
Abstract
Objective:
The aim of this study was to evaluate if addition of metoclopramide to the triplet antiemetic therapy is superior to the trip...
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
CHEMOTHERAPY INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING;
Background: Ginger has long been used as an antiemetic herb in various systems for traditional medicine. However, lack of data on its utility in preventing chemotherapy induced vom...
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Comparative antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide, ondansetron and pyridoxine for the prevention nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Introduction. One of the complications after Cesarean Section is nausea and vomiting, especially during spinal anesthesia. The main causes of nausea and vomiting are complex, and m...

