Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Surgical site infections following spinal surgery affect 0. 3 to 20% of patients. The longer the infection, the greater the chance of antibiotic treatment failure due to the establishment of mature microbial biofilm on the hardware, requiring its removal for infection eradication. Methods Retrospective cohort of patients with microbiologically confirmed SII following spinal surgery treated with debridement and retention. SII was defined as the presence of clinical signs of deep surgical site infection with 2 or more positive culture results of tissue surrounding the implant taken during surgical debridement; or from CT guided biopsy. Inclusion criteria: adults with a 1º episode of microbiological confirmed SII diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 with >2 years of follow-up, treated with implant retention. Definitions Early-onset infection (EOI): infection < 1 month following implant placement. Late onset infection (LOI): between 30 days and 1 year after implant placement. Delayed onset infection (DOI): >1 year of implant placement. Statistical analysis made in Graph Pad Prism 5. 0. Results We analyzed 19 patients with SII treated with hardware retention. Mean age was 54 (21–70) years, 63% were female. Comorbidities, clinical manifestations and motive for surgery are in Table 1 and Figure 1. Hardware material used was titanium 15(79%) and steel 4(21%). In addition to the hardware,11 patients (57. 9%) underwent bone grafting, 4 experienced treatment failure (4/11 = 36. 4%); 2 patients had nonmetallic material inserted (carbon polymer), the 2 patients experienced failure. 16 patients (84. 2%) had EOI, 2 (10. 5%) LOI, 1 (5. 3%) DOI. Failure requiring implant removal was observed in 26. 3% (n = 5), 2 of the cases were EOI, 2 LOI and 1 DOI. Bacterial characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2. 47,4% of patients required more than one debridement (Figure 2). In the lineal regression model, treatment failure was associated with bone grafting (P = 0. 04) and the use of carbon polymer materials (P = 0. 007). Conclusion Treatment of SII with debridement plus antimicrobials treatment is acceptable, with a rate failure of 26%. In LOI and DOI spinal implant retention is more prone to fail. Bone grafting and the presence of polymers seem to be associated with treatment failure of conservative strategies. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Title: 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
Description:
Abstract Background Surgical site infections following spinal surgery affect 0.
3 to 20% of patients.
The longer the infection, the greater the chance of antibiotic treatment failure due to the establishment of mature microbial biofilm on the hardware, requiring its removal for infection eradication.
Methods Retrospective cohort of patients with microbiologically confirmed SII following spinal surgery treated with debridement and retention.
SII was defined as the presence of clinical signs of deep surgical site infection with 2 or more positive culture results of tissue surrounding the implant taken during surgical debridement; or from CT guided biopsy.
Inclusion criteria: adults with a 1º episode of microbiological confirmed SII diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 with >2 years of follow-up, treated with implant retention.
Definitions Early-onset infection (EOI): infection < 1 month following implant placement.
Late onset infection (LOI): between 30 days and 1 year after implant placement.
Delayed onset infection (DOI): >1 year of implant placement.
Statistical analysis made in Graph Pad Prism 5.
0.
Results We analyzed 19 patients with SII treated with hardware retention.
Mean age was 54 (21–70) years, 63% were female.
Comorbidities, clinical manifestations and motive for surgery are in Table 1 and Figure 1.
Hardware material used was titanium 15(79%) and steel 4(21%).
In addition to the hardware,11 patients (57.
9%) underwent bone grafting, 4 experienced treatment failure (4/11 = 36.
4%); 2 patients had nonmetallic material inserted (carbon polymer), the 2 patients experienced failure.
16 patients (84.
2%) had EOI, 2 (10.
5%) LOI, 1 (5.
3%) DOI.
Failure requiring implant removal was observed in 26.
3% (n = 5), 2 of the cases were EOI, 2 LOI and 1 DOI.
Bacterial characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2.
47,4% of patients required more than one debridement (Figure 2).
In the lineal regression model, treatment failure was associated with bone grafting (P = 0.
04) and the use of carbon polymer materials (P = 0.
007).
Conclusion Treatment of SII with debridement plus antimicrobials treatment is acceptable, with a rate failure of 26%.
In LOI and DOI spinal implant retention is more prone to fail.
Bone grafting and the presence of polymers seem to be associated with treatment failure of conservative strategies.
Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Retention Evaluation of Implant-Supported Palateless Maxillary Overdentures Retained by PEEK Telescopic Attachment
Background: Retention and stabilization of implant-supported overdenture is associated with more patient satisfaction, chewing capability, and oral health-related quality of life. ...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Perbandingan Kadar IL-1α antara Tindakan Debridement Tajam Agresif dan Debridement Tajam Konservatif pada Penderita Kaki Diabetik
Perbandingan Kadar IL-1α antara Tindakan Debridement Tajam Agresif dan Debridement Tajam Konservatif pada Penderita Kaki Diabetik
Abstract: Diabetic foot is a chronic complication of diabetes mellitus which is commonly found but very threatening due to its unsatisfied management, usually ended with amputation...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
This special issue is dedicated to the Borneo International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Rehabilitation Conference (BISCIR) which was held on 30th July – 1st August 2021 through a virt...
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: Basics and Beyond
This special issue is dedicated to the Borneo International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Rehabilitation Conference (BISCIR) which was held on 30th July – 1st August 2021 through a virt...

Back to Top