Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Image and Freedom in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813

View through CrossRef
In this paper, my aim is to offer an approach to the practical meaning of the concept of image in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813. The word “image” (Bild) plays an important role within Fichte’s philosophical terminology, especially during the last period of his intellectual production and his academic life, after leaving the University of Jena. Even a superficial reading of the several different versions of the Doctrine of Science allows one to recognize that the above-mentioned term is used by Fichte more frequently during his years in Berlin (1800–1814). Despite this, the determination of the concrete meaning of the term “image” represents a difficult interpretative challenge for readers of Fichte’s philosophy. From my point of view, Fichte uses the term “image” not only at the level of theoretical or methodological reflection, but also at that of praxis. For this reason, Fichte’s transcendental reflection in the Doctrine of the State contains not only an analysis of the negative relationship between image and being, but also, necessarily, an analysis of the positive relationship between image and freedom (Freiheit). Although his Doctrine of the State is based on a theological-religious conception, which could be questioned from the perspective of a secularized rationality, Fichte maintains a consistent conception of knowledge as an image of a world ordered by the moral law. Definitively, this image plays a central role as an original model for the action of every rational being in the sensible world.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Image and Freedom in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813
Description:
In this paper, my aim is to offer an approach to the practical meaning of the concept of image in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813.
The word “image” (Bild) plays an important role within Fichte’s philosophical terminology, especially during the last period of his intellectual production and his academic life, after leaving the University of Jena.
Even a superficial reading of the several different versions of the Doctrine of Science allows one to recognize that the above-mentioned term is used by Fichte more frequently during his years in Berlin (1800–1814).
Despite this, the determination of the concrete meaning of the term “image” represents a difficult interpretative challenge for readers of Fichte’s philosophy.
From my point of view, Fichte uses the term “image” not only at the level of theoretical or methodological reflection, but also at that of praxis.
For this reason, Fichte’s transcendental reflection in the Doctrine of the State contains not only an analysis of the negative relationship between image and being, but also, necessarily, an analysis of the positive relationship between image and freedom (Freiheit).
Although his Doctrine of the State is based on a theological-religious conception, which could be questioned from the perspective of a secularized rationality, Fichte maintains a consistent conception of knowledge as an image of a world ordered by the moral law.
Definitively, this image plays a central role as an original model for the action of every rational being in the sensible world.

Related Results

The Freedomscape of Freedom Camping
The Freedomscape of Freedom Camping
<p><strong>Freedom camping is a popular choice for campers who enjoy flexibility and a sense of freedom, often in a natural landscape. However, the nature of 'freedom' ...
L’intensification de la vie : La pensée religieuse de Fichte (1799-1806)
L’intensification de la vie : La pensée religieuse de Fichte (1799-1806)
Ce travail est une tentative de penser, avec Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814), les rapports entre vie et philosophie. Après 1799 ceux-ci s’avancent en effet comme fil conducteur ...
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
<p>The major questions doctrine has been invoked primarily in the&nbsp;rulemaking context, where it requires agencies to identify particularly clear&nbsp;statutory au...
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte developed Kant’s Critical philosophy into a system of his own, which he named ‘Theory of Science’ or Wissenschaftslehre. Though Fichte continued to revise this system until ...
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (b. 1762–d. 1814) is the first representative of what has been called “German idealism.” He precedes both Schelling, who was considered his disciple until th...
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
This paper addresses some of the figurative properties of Fichte’s philosophical discourse. In many texts from the so-called Spätphilosophie the WL is depicted as an »image of know...
Fichte: Deducción y Argumentos transcendentales
Fichte: Deducción y Argumentos transcendentales
Johann Gottlieb Fichte not tried simply to explain the content of his philosophy in a fragmentary or essayistic form, but in a systematic form. In developing his philosophical syst...
Fichte on Human Rights
Fichte on Human Rights
Abstract The paper reconstructs Fichte’s relational conception of human rights in the Foundations of Natural Right (1796/7) and brings it into conversation with the current debate ...

Back to Top