Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fichte on Human Rights
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The paper reconstructs Fichte’s relational conception of human rights in the Foundations of Natural Right (1796/7) and brings it into conversation with the current debate on the philosophy of human rights. Fichte’s thus far underappreciated account is thereby made accessible, and its original and attractive philosophical features highlighted. I proceed in three steps. First, I argue that Fichte has a complex understanding of human rights. He defends ‘one true human right’ (das eigentliche Menschenrecht) to be part of a legal community in which two ‘original rights’ (Urrechte) are secured: a right to bodily inviolability and a proto-property right to secure access to a (sufficient) part of the world. Second, I show that, for Fichte, the substantive aim of original rights is to establish and secure a non-violent intersubjective relation called ‘free reciprocal efficacy’ (freie Wechselwirkung) which is normatively less demanding than a full relation of right and recognition in Fichte’s sense, or of justice. In this context, I unpack Fichte’s specific understanding of the human body (Leib) as a medium of free (reciprocal) efficacy rather than a biological entity in the original right to bodily inviolability. Third, I elaborate on the peculiar normative status of Fichtean human rights, in particular as non-positive and non-moral.
Title: Fichte on Human Rights
Description:
Abstract
The paper reconstructs Fichte’s relational conception of human rights in the Foundations of Natural Right (1796/7) and brings it into conversation with the current debate on the philosophy of human rights.
Fichte’s thus far underappreciated account is thereby made accessible, and its original and attractive philosophical features highlighted.
I proceed in three steps.
First, I argue that Fichte has a complex understanding of human rights.
He defends ‘one true human right’ (das eigentliche Menschenrecht) to be part of a legal community in which two ‘original rights’ (Urrechte) are secured: a right to bodily inviolability and a proto-property right to secure access to a (sufficient) part of the world.
Second, I show that, for Fichte, the substantive aim of original rights is to establish and secure a non-violent intersubjective relation called ‘free reciprocal efficacy’ (freie Wechselwirkung) which is normatively less demanding than a full relation of right and recognition in Fichte’s sense, or of justice.
In this context, I unpack Fichte’s specific understanding of the human body (Leib) as a medium of free (reciprocal) efficacy rather than a biological entity in the original right to bodily inviolability.
Third, I elaborate on the peculiar normative status of Fichtean human rights, in particular as non-positive and non-moral.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (b. 1762–d. 1814) is the first representative of what has been called “German idealism.” He precedes both Schelling, who was considered his disciple until th...
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte developed Kant’s Critical philosophy into a system of his own, which he named ‘Theory of Science’ or Wissenschaftslehre. Though Fichte continued to revise this system until ...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
This paper addresses some of the figurative properties of Fichte’s philosophical discourse. In many texts from the so-called Spätphilosophie the WL is depicted as an »image of know...

