Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Fichte: Deducción y Argumentos transcendentales

View through CrossRef
Johann Gottlieb Fichte not tried simply to explain the content of his philosophy in a fragmentary or essayistic form, but in a systematic form. In developing his philosophical system called Wissenschaftslehre (WL), Fichte always applies a rigorous method. Of course, the adoption of this method and its subsequent application in the several versions of WL is not the result of a casual or arbitrary decision. The characteristics of the method used by Fichte have a strong relationship with the meaning of his philosophical project. In this paper, I try to study the method used by Fichte as a method of "transcendental deduction", which has a strong relationship with the practical significance of his philosophy. Indeed, Fichte explicitly refers to his own method as a "deduction" (Deduction) in his writings Jena´s period (1794-1799). Although this deductive method is originally inspired by the Kantian philosophy, acquires a broader development in the system of Wissenschaftslehre, as a process of foundation on necessary principles of all human knowledge (theoretical and practical). In my point of view, Fichte's transcendental deduction is a complex method, in which three elements are articulated: argumentation, intellectual intuition and reflection. Not only becomes necessary the permanent reference to the constitutive activity of consciousness in each of these methodological dimensions, but also to the practice and its normative principles, originated from the human reason.
Title: Fichte: Deducción y Argumentos transcendentales
Description:
Johann Gottlieb Fichte not tried simply to explain the content of his philosophy in a fragmentary or essayistic form, but in a systematic form.
In developing his philosophical system called Wissenschaftslehre (WL), Fichte always applies a rigorous method.
Of course, the adoption of this method and its subsequent application in the several versions of WL is not the result of a casual or arbitrary decision.
The characteristics of the method used by Fichte have a strong relationship with the meaning of his philosophical project.
In this paper, I try to study the method used by Fichte as a method of "transcendental deduction", which has a strong relationship with the practical significance of his philosophy.
Indeed, Fichte explicitly refers to his own method as a "deduction" (Deduction) in his writings Jena´s period (1794-1799).
Although this deductive method is originally inspired by the Kantian philosophy, acquires a broader development in the system of Wissenschaftslehre, as a process of foundation on necessary principles of all human knowledge (theoretical and practical).
In my point of view, Fichte's transcendental deduction is a complex method, in which three elements are articulated: argumentation, intellectual intuition and reflection.
Not only becomes necessary the permanent reference to the constitutive activity of consciousness in each of these methodological dimensions, but also to the practice and its normative principles, originated from the human reason.

Related Results

Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Johann Gottlieb Fichte (b. 1762–d. 1814) is the first representative of what has been called “German idealism.” He precedes both Schelling, who was considered his disciple until th...
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1762–1814)
Fichte developed Kant’s Critical philosophy into a system of his own, which he named ‘Theory of Science’ or Wissenschaftslehre. Though Fichte continued to revise this system until ...
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
La Doctrine de la science à l’usage des artistes
This paper addresses some of the figurative properties of Fichte’s philosophical discourse. In many texts from the so-called Spätphilosophie the WL is depicted as an »image of know...
Image and Freedom in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813
Image and Freedom in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813
In this paper, my aim is to offer an approach to the practical meaning of the concept of image in Fichte’s Doctrine of the State of 1813. The word “image” (Bild) plays an important...
L’intensification de la vie : La pensée religieuse de Fichte (1799-1806)
L’intensification de la vie : La pensée religieuse de Fichte (1799-1806)
Ce travail est une tentative de penser, avec Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762-1814), les rapports entre vie et philosophie. Après 1799 ceux-ci s’avancent en effet comme fil conducteur ...
DE VOLTA A KANT? A FENOMENOLOGIA TRANSCENDENTAL TARDIA DE FICHTE
DE VOLTA A KANT? A FENOMENOLOGIA TRANSCENDENTAL TARDIA DE FICHTE
Na literatura secundária sobre a obra tardia de Johann Gottlieb Fichte, pelo menos não é incomum atribuir ao Fichte dessa fase um retorno a Immanuel Kant.1 Como um filho que se per...
Fichte ve Yunus Emre'de Arı Ben’in İfadesi
Fichte ve Yunus Emre'de Arı Ben’in İfadesi
Bu çalışma Fichte ve Yunus Emre’de Arı Ben’in ele alınış ve ifade ediliş tarzlarındaki ortak temalara yer vermektedir. Bu amaçla çalışma, Batı zihin dünyasında Descartes’le başlaya...
The relevance of J.G.Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre (towards the 260th anniversary of the thinker’s birth)
The relevance of J.G.Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre (towards the 260th anniversary of the thinker’s birth)
260 years since the birth of Fichte give a good reason to turn to his Wissenschaftslehre, which, together with Kant’s critical philosophy, is a bridge from the past to the future s...

Back to Top