Harmonisasi Hukum Bisnis Transnasional Di Negara Kamerun

An important question concerning legal uniformity under OHADA is, can OHADA bridgebetween the common law system and the civil law system? Is OHADA compatible with commonlaw? Does OHADA have the capacity to address the diversity of African legal and judicialtraditions? Does OHADA take into account African cultural and traditional norms? It seems thatif not, then the integration process will be an uncomfortable marriage. Can Cameroon's longitudebe maintained, much less promoted, in the context of OHADA? Can meaningful reforms takenational particulars into account? The thing that is of greater concern is whether OHADA canaccommodate the contradictory conditions of contemporary society and the challenges ofglobalization and modernization. The right approach should be to promote laws, principles, andpractices that conform to conventional and universally accepted standards of fairness and justicethat are modified to suit the realities of Cameroon and Africa. This article will discuss thehistorical background of Cameroon's legal framework, the nature, current trends of Uniform Lawreform, and the challenges of developing and implementing the OHADA Agreement and theUniform Act. Finally, in keeping with the spirit and philosophy that the legal system is meant toserve as the touchstone of justice and equality, this Article proposes its way forward with theOHADA Agreement and the Uniform Act, which have come to stay