Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P02-270 - Pathographical Aspects About N.V. Gogol

View through CrossRef
Whether the dead of the author, who burnt the second volume of his book “The Dead Souls”, was psychopathological? A part of N.V.Gogol's contemporaries supported that his death was a consequence of “mental disease”. The myth about Gogol's “craziness” became a firm stereotype in European psychiatry presented by C.Lombrozo. Later, many russian psychiatrists (N.Bazhenov, V.Chizh, G.segalin, I.Galant, A.Lichko, A.Molochov, D.E.Melechov) tried to prove this opinion using published materials. However, all these psychiatrists did not give any scientific answer, for they had rather superficial understanding of life, kind of mind and religious constitution of N.V.Gogol. These psychiatrists, sorry to say, didn't have the systematic humanitarian knowledge so that to overcome the stereotype of natural-scientific paradygm of contemporary Psychiatry. One can't understand and relevant explain the behaviour of a man in another cultural and historical age, for example Gogol, without any special philological and philosophical preparation. The process of true understanding of another person is rather subjective, depending on an intentia of the consciousness on terminology of F.Brentano or on the hermeneutic circle according to M.Heidegger. All psychiatrists were under his personal delusions and simulacres about Gogol's spiritual life as a orthodox Christian man, because they used not full, and, mainly, not authentic information about Gogol's life, distored by some false interpretations, yet taken indirectly.
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: P02-270 - Pathographical Aspects About N.V. Gogol
Description:
Whether the dead of the author, who burnt the second volume of his book “The Dead Souls”, was psychopathological? A part of N.
V.
Gogol's contemporaries supported that his death was a consequence of “mental disease”.
The myth about Gogol's “craziness” became a firm stereotype in European psychiatry presented by C.
Lombrozo.
Later, many russian psychiatrists (N.
Bazhenov, V.
Chizh, G.
segalin, I.
Galant, A.
Lichko, A.
Molochov, D.
E.
Melechov) tried to prove this opinion using published materials.
However, all these psychiatrists did not give any scientific answer, for they had rather superficial understanding of life, kind of mind and religious constitution of N.
V.
Gogol.
These psychiatrists, sorry to say, didn't have the systematic humanitarian knowledge so that to overcome the stereotype of natural-scientific paradygm of contemporary Psychiatry.
One can't understand and relevant explain the behaviour of a man in another cultural and historical age, for example Gogol, without any special philological and philosophical preparation.
The process of true understanding of another person is rather subjective, depending on an intentia of the consciousness on terminology of F.
Brentano or on the hermeneutic circle according to M.
Heidegger.
All psychiatrists were under his personal delusions and simulacres about Gogol's spiritual life as a orthodox Christian man, because they used not full, and, mainly, not authentic information about Gogol's life, distored by some false interpretations, yet taken indirectly.

Related Results

The Dog Who Tells Lies in Nikolai Gogol’s Comedy “Marriage”
The Dog Who Tells Lies in Nikolai Gogol’s Comedy “Marriage”
This article draws attention to the expression pyos vryot ‘dog tells lies’ found in the matchmaker’s line from the comedy “Marriage” by Nikolai Gogol. Researchers have already stud...
Traditions of N. V. Gogol in prose by Jia Zhifang
Traditions of N. V. Gogol in prose by Jia Zhifang
The subject of the research in the article is the features of the reception of the works of N. V. Gogol in the works of the Chinese writer of the XX century Jia Zhifang. The method...
Hronotop prazdnika v metasûžete Gogolâ
Hronotop prazdnika v metasûžete Gogolâ
The importance of folk holidays, which determine the belonging of Gogol’s work to the traditions of laughter carnival culture, was substantiated by M. Bakhtin in his article Rabela...
N.V. Gogol, Louis Viardot, Ivan Turgenev and the story Viy: Lost in translation
N.V. Gogol, Louis Viardot, Ivan Turgenev and the story Viy: Lost in translation
The paper examines the first French translation of N.V. Gogol’s novella Viy, published in 1847 in the newspaper Journal des Débats Politiques et Littéraires (dated December 16, 17 ...
N. V. Gogol’s Portrait and V. F. Odoevsky’s Opere del cavaliere Giambattista Piranesi: Ethics, Aesthetics, Poetics
N. V. Gogol’s Portrait and V. F. Odoevsky’s Opere del cavaliere Giambattista Piranesi: Ethics, Aesthetics, Poetics
The article analyzes Opere del cavaliere Giambattista Piranesi by V. F. Odoevsky and Portrait by N. V. Gogol. Changes in the editions of the stories and roll calls in the texts are...
Family “passports” of N. V. Gogol's comedy “Marriage”
Family “passports” of N. V. Gogol's comedy “Marriage”
The article explores the meaning of the surnames in Gogol’s comedy “Marriage”. The origin of the names of the grooms Zhevakin (zhevat’ — chew) and Onuchkin is associated with the f...
Tim Key and Gogol's Overcoat: Review 1
Tim Key and Gogol's Overcoat: Review 1
This finely wrought fusion of fiction and realism is an illuminating, enchanting, listening experience. On one level it can be heard as a playful riff on absurdism, on art, by a cl...
Résumés des conférences JRANF 2021
Résumés des conférences JRANF 2021
able des matières Résumés. 140 Agenda Formation en Radioprotection JRANF 2021 Ouagadougou. 140 RPF 1 Rappel des unités de doses. 140 RPF 2 Risques déterministes et stochastique...

Back to Top