Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P02-270 - Pathographical Aspects About N.V. Gogol
View through CrossRef
Whether the dead of the author, who burnt the second volume of his book “The Dead Souls”, was psychopathological? A part of N.V.Gogol's contemporaries supported that his death was a consequence of “mental disease”. The myth about Gogol's “craziness” became a firm stereotype in European psychiatry presented by C.Lombrozo. Later, many russian psychiatrists (N.Bazhenov, V.Chizh, G.segalin, I.Galant, A.Lichko, A.Molochov, D.E.Melechov) tried to prove this opinion using published materials. However, all these psychiatrists did not give any scientific answer, for they had rather superficial understanding of life, kind of mind and religious constitution of N.V.Gogol. These psychiatrists, sorry to say, didn't have the systematic humanitarian knowledge so that to overcome the stereotype of natural-scientific paradygm of contemporary Psychiatry. One can't understand and relevant explain the behaviour of a man in another cultural and historical age, for example Gogol, without any special philological and philosophical preparation. The process of true understanding of another person is rather subjective, depending on an intentia of the consciousness on terminology of F.Brentano or on the hermeneutic circle according to M.Heidegger. All psychiatrists were under his personal delusions and simulacres about Gogol's spiritual life as a orthodox Christian man, because they used not full, and, mainly, not authentic information about Gogol's life, distored by some false interpretations, yet taken indirectly.
Title: P02-270 - Pathographical Aspects About N.V. Gogol
Description:
Whether the dead of the author, who burnt the second volume of his book “The Dead Souls”, was psychopathological? A part of N.
V.
Gogol's contemporaries supported that his death was a consequence of “mental disease”.
The myth about Gogol's “craziness” became a firm stereotype in European psychiatry presented by C.
Lombrozo.
Later, many russian psychiatrists (N.
Bazhenov, V.
Chizh, G.
segalin, I.
Galant, A.
Lichko, A.
Molochov, D.
E.
Melechov) tried to prove this opinion using published materials.
However, all these psychiatrists did not give any scientific answer, for they had rather superficial understanding of life, kind of mind and religious constitution of N.
V.
Gogol.
These psychiatrists, sorry to say, didn't have the systematic humanitarian knowledge so that to overcome the stereotype of natural-scientific paradygm of contemporary Psychiatry.
One can't understand and relevant explain the behaviour of a man in another cultural and historical age, for example Gogol, without any special philological and philosophical preparation.
The process of true understanding of another person is rather subjective, depending on an intentia of the consciousness on terminology of F.
Brentano or on the hermeneutic circle according to M.
Heidegger.
All psychiatrists were under his personal delusions and simulacres about Gogol's spiritual life as a orthodox Christian man, because they used not full, and, mainly, not authentic information about Gogol's life, distored by some false interpretations, yet taken indirectly.
Related Results
МИРОСОЗЕРЦАНИЕ И ПОЭТИКА Н. В. ГОГОЛЯ В КРИТИКЕ РУССКОЙ ЭМИГРАЦИИ (1921—2018)
МИРОСОЗЕРЦАНИЕ И ПОЭТИКА Н. В. ГОГОЛЯ В КРИТИКЕ РУССКОЙ ЭМИГРАЦИИ (1921—2018)
The Russian émigré community paid particular attention to Nikolai Gogol (possibly comparable only with Aleksandr Pushkin and Fedor Dostoevsky). Themes and issues in Russian émigrés...
The mystery of Gogol’s death
The mystery of Gogol’s death
The circumstances of the illness and death of the great writer Nikolai Vasilyevich Gogol are surrounded with riddles and mysticism. Gogol’s abdominal pain disturbed him throughout ...
N.V. Gogol’s Works and Censorship
N.V. Gogol’s Works and Censorship
For the first time, an analytical review of all, without exception, censorship stories of N.V. Gogol’s works is presented. An objective picture of Gogol's relationship with the cen...
Creative Pluralism in Indian and Romanian Accounts of Transnational Migration
Creative Pluralism in Indian and Romanian Accounts of Transnational Migration
Abstract
The paper offers a comparative perspective on transmigrant cultural identities as illustrated in the works of two contemporary South Asian American and Romanian American a...
The Dog Who Tells Lies in Nikolai Gogol’s Comedy “Marriage”
The Dog Who Tells Lies in Nikolai Gogol’s Comedy “Marriage”
This article draws attention to the expression pyos vryot ‘dog tells lies’ found in the matchmaker’s line from the comedy “Marriage” by Nikolai Gogol. Researchers have already stud...
Traditions of N. V. Gogol in prose by Jia Zhifang
Traditions of N. V. Gogol in prose by Jia Zhifang
The subject of the research in the article is the features of the reception of the works of N. V. Gogol in the works of the Chinese writer of the XX century Jia Zhifang. The method...
Psychology of Nikolai Gogol
Psychology of Nikolai Gogol
The article first considers the heritage specifics of Nikolai Gogol as a satirist from the
point of view of the writer’s psychology. The close connection of psychology and satire i...
The Concept of Law in the Works of Nikolay Gogol
The Concept of Law in the Works of Nikolay Gogol
<p>The article for the first time raises a question about one of the profiles of Gogol’s activity as a “satirist”, a denouncer of morals. In his...

