Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Japanese Patients Based on Modified MADIT-ICD Benefit Score
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Aims
The MADIT-ICD benefit score is used to stratify the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia and non-arrhythmic mortality. We sought to develop an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) benefit-prediction score for Japanese patients with ICDs.
Methods
Patients who underwent ICD implantation as primary prophylaxis were retrospectively enrolled. Based on their MADIT-ICD benefit scores, we developed a modified MADIT-ICD benefit score adapted to the Japanese population. The primary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapy (non-arrhythmic death). We used the Fine and Gray multivariate model and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify factors for adjusting the MADIT-ICD benefit–risk score specifically for the Japanese population. The scoring points for the original MADIT-ICD benefit score were adjusted to optimal points based on the multivariate analysis results in the population.
Results
The study enrolled 167 patients [age, 61.9 ± 12.3 years; male individuals, 138 (82.6%); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (43.7%); ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (31.7%)]. Fourteen patients received anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and 23 received shock therapy as the initial appropriate ICD therapy. Non-arrhythmic deaths occurred in 37 patients. The original MADIT-ICD benefit score could not stratify non-arrhythmic mortality in the Japanese population. The patients were reclassified into three groups according to the modified MADIT-ICD benefit score. The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score could effectively stratify the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality. In the highest-benefit group, the 10 year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality were 56.8% and 12.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the intermediate-benefit group, these rates were 20.2% and 40.2% (P = 0.01). In the lowest-benefit group, the incidence of non-arrhythmic deaths was 68.1%, and no patient received appropriate ICD therapy.
Conclusions
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score may be useful for stratifying ICD candidates in the Japanese population.
Title: Benefit of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Japanese Patients Based on Modified MADIT-ICD Benefit Score
Description:
Abstract
Aims
The MADIT-ICD benefit score is used to stratify the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia and non-arrhythmic mortality.
We sought to develop an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) benefit-prediction score for Japanese patients with ICDs.
Methods
Patients who underwent ICD implantation as primary prophylaxis were retrospectively enrolled.
Based on their MADIT-ICD benefit scores, we developed a modified MADIT-ICD benefit score adapted to the Japanese population.
The primary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapy (non-arrhythmic death).
We used the Fine and Gray multivariate model and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify factors for adjusting the MADIT-ICD benefit–risk score specifically for the Japanese population.
The scoring points for the original MADIT-ICD benefit score were adjusted to optimal points based on the multivariate analysis results in the population.
Results
The study enrolled 167 patients [age, 61.
9 ± 12.
3 years; male individuals, 138 (82.
6%); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (43.
7%); ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (31.
7%)].
Fourteen patients received anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and 23 received shock therapy as the initial appropriate ICD therapy.
Non-arrhythmic deaths occurred in 37 patients.
The original MADIT-ICD benefit score could not stratify non-arrhythmic mortality in the Japanese population.
The patients were reclassified into three groups according to the modified MADIT-ICD benefit score.
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score could effectively stratify the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality.
In the highest-benefit group, the 10 year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality were 56.
8% and 12.
9%, respectively (P < 0.
01).
In the intermediate-benefit group, these rates were 20.
2% and 40.
2% (P = 0.
01).
In the lowest-benefit group, the incidence of non-arrhythmic deaths was 68.
1%, and no patient received appropriate ICD therapy.
Conclusions
The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score may be useful for stratifying ICD candidates in the Japanese population.
Related Results
The effects of age on quality of life in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients
The effects of age on quality of life in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients
Background. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator shows superiority over conventional pharmacological therapy. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator has been implanted w...
Clinical performance of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: data from Monaldi Rhythm Registry
Clinical performance of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: data from Monaldi Rhythm Registry
IntroductionSubcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is an alternative to a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) system in selected patients not in need of pacing or resynch...
The Clinical and Economic Impact of Extended Battery Longevity of a Substernal Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
The Clinical and Economic Impact of Extended Battery Longevity of a Substernal Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Background and Aims:
The extravascular implantable cardioverter
defibrillator (EV ICD) has an extended projected battery longevity
compared to the subcutaneous im...
Arrythmic storm in patients with and without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Arrythmic storm in patients with and without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Abstract
Introduction
Available data on arrhythmic storm (AS) is frequently obtained from retrospective observational series of ...
Secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy: value in octogenarians
Secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy: value in octogenarians
Abstract
Background
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is well established for secondary prevention, but studies on the efficacy a...
Clinical outcomes of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy in a polymorbid patient cohort
Clinical outcomes of subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable defibrillator therapy in a polymorbid patient cohort
BackgroundThe subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has been designed to overcome lead-related complications and device endocarditis. Lacking the ability for ...
Phecoder: semantic retrieval for auditing and expanding ICD-based phenotypes in EHR biobanks
Phecoder: semantic retrieval for auditing and expanding ICD-based phenotypes in EHR biobanks
Abstract
Background
Electronic health record (EHR)–based phenotyping underpins genome-wide association studies, yet current ICD...
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Hospitalizations in the Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
Background—
This study reports the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on hospitalizations in patients randomized to implantable cardioverter-defi...

