Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Implant-Abutment Interface Misfits After Casting and Soldering Procedures

View through CrossRef
The aim of this study was to compare vertical and horizontal adjustments of castable abutments after conducting casting and soldering procedures. Twelve external hexagonal implants (3.75 × 10 mm) and their UCLA abutments were divided according their manufacturer and abutment type: PUN (plastic UCLA, Neodent), PUC (plastic UCLA, Conexão), PU3i (plastic UCLA, Biomet 3i), and PUTN (plastic UCLA with Tilite milled base, Neodent). Three infrastructures of a fixed partial implant–supported bridge with 3 elements were produced for each group. The measurements of vertical (VM) and horizontal (HM) misfits were obtained via scanning electron microscopy after completion of casting and soldering. The corresponding values were determined to be biomechanically acceptable to the system, and the results were rated as a percentage. Statistical analysis establishes differences between groups by chi-square after procedures, and McNeman's test was applied to analyze the influence of soldering over casting (α ≤ .05). For the values of VM and HM, respectively, when the casting process was complete, it was observed that 83.25% and 100% (PUTN), 33.3% and 27.75% (PUN), 33.3% and 88.8% (PUC), 33.3% and 94.35% (PU3i) represented acceptable values. After completing the requisite soldering, acceptable values were 50% and 94.35% (PUTN), 16.6% and 77.7% (PUN), 38.55% and 77.7% (PUC), and 27.75% and 94.35% (PU3i). Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the premachined abutments presented more acceptable VM values. The HM values were within acceptable limits before and after the soldering procedure for most groups. Further, the soldering procedure resulted in an increase of VM in all groups.
Title: Comparison of Implant-Abutment Interface Misfits After Casting and Soldering Procedures
Description:
The aim of this study was to compare vertical and horizontal adjustments of castable abutments after conducting casting and soldering procedures.
Twelve external hexagonal implants (3.
75 × 10 mm) and their UCLA abutments were divided according their manufacturer and abutment type: PUN (plastic UCLA, Neodent), PUC (plastic UCLA, Conexão), PU3i (plastic UCLA, Biomet 3i), and PUTN (plastic UCLA with Tilite milled base, Neodent).
Three infrastructures of a fixed partial implant–supported bridge with 3 elements were produced for each group.
The measurements of vertical (VM) and horizontal (HM) misfits were obtained via scanning electron microscopy after completion of casting and soldering.
The corresponding values were determined to be biomechanically acceptable to the system, and the results were rated as a percentage.
Statistical analysis establishes differences between groups by chi-square after procedures, and McNeman's test was applied to analyze the influence of soldering over casting (α ≤ .
05).
For the values of VM and HM, respectively, when the casting process was complete, it was observed that 83.
25% and 100% (PUTN), 33.
3% and 27.
75% (PUN), 33.
3% and 88.
8% (PUC), 33.
3% and 94.
35% (PU3i) represented acceptable values.
After completing the requisite soldering, acceptable values were 50% and 94.
35% (PUTN), 16.
6% and 77.
7% (PUN), 38.
55% and 77.
7% (PUC), and 27.
75% and 94.
35% (PU3i).
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the premachined abutments presented more acceptable VM values.
The HM values were within acceptable limits before and after the soldering procedure for most groups.
Further, the soldering procedure resulted in an increase of VM in all groups.

Related Results

Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental Implant Abutments and Their Selection - A Review
Dental implants have become the most promising and accepted prosthetic alternative to missing teeth. Innovative and technological advances in implant dentistry have improved the pe...
Today's Vapor Phase Soldering: an Optimized Reflow Technology for Lead Free Soldering
Today's Vapor Phase Soldering: an Optimized Reflow Technology for Lead Free Soldering
ABSTRACT In the beginning of SMT, Vapor Phase Soldering was the preferred reflow soldering technology because of its excellent heat transfer capabilities. There w...
REUSE OF THE INTRAOSSEOUS PART OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT (THE CLINICAL CASE)
REUSE OF THE INTRAOSSEOUS PART OF THE DENTAL IMPLANT (THE CLINICAL CASE)
Introduction. Replacement of a small included defect in the frontal area with a fixed structure based on the implant is the optimal solution. It is not always required to remove th...
Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review
Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review
Implant supported dental prostheses are increasingly used in dental practice. The aim of this narrative review is to present the influence of transmucosal surface of prosthetic abu...

Back to Top