Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Principle of Good and Bad Faith in Business Dispute Resolution (A Critical Juridical Study on The Trademark Dispute Case Between Mohindar H.B and Pt Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia)
View through CrossRef
The trademark polemic involving PT Polo Ralph Lauren and Mohindar H.B. was removed from the closeness regarding the Polo brand by Ralph Lauren, where Mohindar H.B. managed to defeat Polo by Ralph Lauren. The purpose of this study is to explore the legal meaning of the application of the principle of bad faith in the fight between PT Polo versus Mohndar H.B. This study also aims to explore how to resolve the dispute between PT Polo and Mohindar in accordance with the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law. The approach method used is normative legal with data collection techniques through library studies and online research, descriptive analytical in nature. The types of data collected include secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. This study applies systematic analysis to the data. The findings of this study indicate that the trademark owned by PT Polo Ralph Lauren was cancelled and deleted based on the Decision Number 9 PK/Pdt.Sus.HKI/2024 won by Mohindar H.B, with the consideration that the application of the principle of bad faith by PT Polo and non-compliance with the principle of first to file were important factors for the Supreme Court Judge in making a decision on the case.
Title: The Principle of Good and Bad Faith in Business Dispute Resolution (A Critical Juridical Study on The Trademark Dispute Case Between Mohindar H.B and Pt Polo Ralph Lauren Indonesia)
Description:
The trademark polemic involving PT Polo Ralph Lauren and Mohindar H.
B.
was removed from the closeness regarding the Polo brand by Ralph Lauren, where Mohindar H.
B.
managed to defeat Polo by Ralph Lauren.
The purpose of this study is to explore the legal meaning of the application of the principle of bad faith in the fight between PT Polo versus Mohndar H.
B.
This study also aims to explore how to resolve the dispute between PT Polo and Mohindar in accordance with the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law.
The approach method used is normative legal with data collection techniques through library studies and online research, descriptive analytical in nature.
The types of data collected include secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.
This study applies systematic analysis to the data.
The findings of this study indicate that the trademark owned by PT Polo Ralph Lauren was cancelled and deleted based on the Decision Number 9 PK/Pdt.
Sus.
HKI/2024 won by Mohindar H.
B, with the consideration that the application of the principle of bad faith by PT Polo and non-compliance with the principle of first to file were important factors for the Supreme Court Judge in making a decision on the case.
Related Results
Air Qiaodan
Air Qiaodan
Purpose
For this study, the Jordan case provided the context for investigating Chinese trademark law with the purpose of answering how and why Jordan lost the legal rights to the C...
Seeking Alternative of Trademark Cancellation in Indonesia: From Trademark Law to Religious Ethical Corporative Theory
Seeking Alternative of Trademark Cancellation in Indonesia: From Trademark Law to Religious Ethical Corporative Theory
Background: Trademark disputes in Indonesia often arise due to similarity in principle (persamaan pada pokoknya) and bad faith registration, as regulated under Law No. 20 of 2016 ...
PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK DAN GUGATAN ATAS PELANGGARAN MEREK
PENGGABUNGAN GUGATAN PEMBATALAN MEREK DAN GUGATAN ATAS PELANGGARAN MEREK
Problems in registering a mark that is conceptually identical to another mark can be resolved by filing a trademark cancellation lawsuit. However, in drafting a lawsuit, the owner ...
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PENGALIHAN HAK DALAM SENGKETA HAK MEREK POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PENGALIHAN HAK DALAM SENGKETA HAK MEREK POLO BY RALPH LAUREN
Sengketa pengalihan hak antara Mohindar H.B dengan PT Manggala Putra Perkasa diakibatkan oleh Mohindar H.B yang tidak terima merek yang dimilikinya digunakan karena Mohindar merasa...
PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA
PENGHAPUSAN PENDAFTARAN MEREK BERDASARKAN GUGATAN PIHAK KETIGA
The right of a trademark is an exclusive right granted by government. A registered trademark can be cancelled from the General List of Trademark. Cancellation of registration of a ...
MEREK TIGA DIMENSI DALAM HUKUM MEREK INDONESIA
MEREK TIGA DIMENSI DALAM HUKUM MEREK INDONESIA
ABSTRAK
Indonesia telah mengakui dan melindungi merek non-tradisional khususnya merek tiga dimensi (3D) sebagaimana tertuang dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek ...
KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK PADA POLO BY RALP LAUREN (Studi putusan No 83/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst)
KAJIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK PADA POLO BY RALP LAUREN (Studi putusan No 83/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek2022/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst)
Settlement of disputes over the Polo by Ralph Laurem brand according to the commercial court decision no 83/pdt.sus- HKI/Merek2022//PN NiagaJkt.Pst. In this decision, the panel of ...
Use of real-life imagery and words in luxury brand trademarks: a study of the trademark lawsuits involving the Polo/Lauren Company
Use of real-life imagery and words in luxury brand trademarks: a study of the trademark lawsuits involving the Polo/Lauren Company
PurposeThis article presents a study of the trademark lawsuits in Singapore involving the Polo/Lauren Company, L.P. (“PRL”) in their attempts to stop various competitors and busine...

