Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Unknown Florestan: The 1805 Version of "In des Lebens Frühlingstagen"

View through CrossRef
Our understanding of Beethoven's initial effort in opera, the 1805 version of Fidelio, is significantly clouded by certain difficulties in establishing its text. An especially obscure point is Florestan's aria at the beginning of the third act. Simply put, no surviving source transmits the aria as it was performed in 1805. In order to publish a complete, performable text for the opera, the editors of the Ur-Leonore, Erich Prieger and Willy Hess, present the aria in a version that conflates 1805 and 1806 sources. To shed some light on the lost 1805 version of the aria and on Beethoven's understanding of the piece, the present paper turns to the so-called Leonore sketchbook of 1804-5. The latest stages of 1805 sketches reveal a version that comprises three sections corresponding to basic shifts of perspective in the poem: an Adagio in A♭ major for Florestan's reflections on the meaning of his suffering; a Moderato in F major for the remembrance of his life with Leonore; and an Andante in F minor for his stoic advice to the distant beloved. Was this three-tempo version in fact performed at the premiere? This question cannot be answered definitively, but various bits of evidence, including the overture of 1805, sources for the 1806 revision, and the testimony of the tenor who sang the part of Florestan in 1806, suggest that the version performed in 1805 may have approximated the three-tempo version in the Leonore sketchbook. Further, the sources for the 1806 version suggest that the limitations of the tenor who sang the role of Florestan in 1805 lay behind a number of revisions.
Title: The Unknown Florestan: The 1805 Version of "In des Lebens Frühlingstagen"
Description:
Our understanding of Beethoven's initial effort in opera, the 1805 version of Fidelio, is significantly clouded by certain difficulties in establishing its text.
An especially obscure point is Florestan's aria at the beginning of the third act.
Simply put, no surviving source transmits the aria as it was performed in 1805.
In order to publish a complete, performable text for the opera, the editors of the Ur-Leonore, Erich Prieger and Willy Hess, present the aria in a version that conflates 1805 and 1806 sources.
To shed some light on the lost 1805 version of the aria and on Beethoven's understanding of the piece, the present paper turns to the so-called Leonore sketchbook of 1804-5.
The latest stages of 1805 sketches reveal a version that comprises three sections corresponding to basic shifts of perspective in the poem: an Adagio in A♭ major for Florestan's reflections on the meaning of his suffering; a Moderato in F major for the remembrance of his life with Leonore; and an Andante in F minor for his stoic advice to the distant beloved.
Was this three-tempo version in fact performed at the premiere? This question cannot be answered definitively, but various bits of evidence, including the overture of 1805, sources for the 1806 revision, and the testimony of the tenor who sang the part of Florestan in 1806, suggest that the version performed in 1805 may have approximated the three-tempo version in the Leonore sketchbook.
Further, the sources for the 1806 version suggest that the limitations of the tenor who sang the role of Florestan in 1805 lay behind a number of revisions.

Related Results

Fidelio and the French Revolution
Fidelio and the French Revolution
Fidelio has always posed difficulties for operatic interpreters. On the literal level it is straight-forward enough, much more so, certainly, than its great Mozartian predecessor, ...
De volta a 1964: o papel do intelectual em Florestan Fernandes e Fernando Henrique Cardoso
De volta a 1964: o papel do intelectual em Florestan Fernandes e Fernando Henrique Cardoso
Esta comunicação está dividida em duas partes. Na primeira, farei um debate sobre a relação entre cultura e política ou, precisamente, sobre o papel do intelectual. Para tanto, dis...
Em memória de Florestan Fernandes
Em memória de Florestan Fernandes
Foram muitas as lutas e os combates enfrentados por Florestan Fernandes durante sua fecunda vida. Nos anos recentes, embora fisicamente combalido por uma doença - cirrose hepática ...
Florestan Fernandes, um pensador socialista radical
Florestan Fernandes, um pensador socialista radical
Neste artigo procuro responder algumas questões sobre a relação entre ciência e política em Florestan Fernandes: em que medida o cientista social – na linhagem do marxismo clássico...
A IDENTIDADE BRASILEIRA: CONTRIBUIÇÕES NA OBRA DE FLORESTAN FERNANDES
A IDENTIDADE BRASILEIRA: CONTRIBUIÇÕES NA OBRA DE FLORESTAN FERNANDES
Sabe-se que o século XX foi de fundamental importância para a constituição do Brasil como Estado-nação, perante sua posição no capitalismo global e sua constituição enquanto nação ...
INDUSTRIALIZAÇÃO BRASILEIRA: DIÁLOGOS ENTRE CAIO PRADO JR., CELSO FURTADO, FLORESTAN FERNANDES E IGNÁCIO RANGEL
INDUSTRIALIZAÇÃO BRASILEIRA: DIÁLOGOS ENTRE CAIO PRADO JR., CELSO FURTADO, FLORESTAN FERNANDES E IGNÁCIO RANGEL
Há um diálogo tácito entre grandes intérpretes do Brasil, nem sempre visível num primeiro olhar. Por exemplo, Caio Prado Jr., Celso Furtado, Florestan Fernandes e Ignácio Rangel, a...
Lewis and Clarks’ Tempest: The ‘perfect storm’ of November 1805, Oregon, USA
Lewis and Clarks’ Tempest: The ‘perfect storm’ of November 1805, Oregon, USA
Three weeks after arriving near the Pacific Northwest (PNW) coast in November 1805, Lewis and Clarks’ Corps of Discovery experienced a two-day windstorm that may have rivaled the s...
A originalidade do conceito de capitalismo dependente em Florestan Fernandes
A originalidade do conceito de capitalismo dependente em Florestan Fernandes
De modo sucinto e didático, o objetivo do artigo é assinalar a originalidade do conceito de capitalismo dependente na obra de Florestan Fernandes quando comparado a um conjunto de ...

Back to Top