Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MAGNESIUM SULFATE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN SUBARACHNOID BLOCK FOR INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES
View through CrossRef
Objective: The objective is to compare the efficacy of intrathecal magnesium sulfate versus intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of spinal anesthesia characteristics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing infra-umbillical surgeries.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, hundred adult patients in the age group of 18–65 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 and 2, posted for infra-umbilical surgeries under subarachnoid block were included. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each after obtaining Hospital ethical committee approval and Informed consent. Group M (50 patients) was given Inj. Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% (heavy) 15 mg+Inj. Magnesium Sulfate 50 mg (0.1 mL) and Group D (50 patients) were given Inj. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.5% (heavy) 15 mg+Inj. Dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.1 mL). Hemodynamic parameters, onset, and duration of sensory blockade, time taken to reach the highest dermatomal level (T1) of sensory blockade, time taken to achieve motor blockade (Modified Bromage score 3), duration of sensory analgesia (Regression to L1), time to complete motor block recovery and duration post-operative analgesia were recorded.
Results: Time taken for onset of sensory block, to achieve the highest dermatomal level of sensory blockade, onset of motor block and to achieve Bromage score 3 were less in Group D as compared to that of Group M (p<0.0001). The total duration of sensory blockade and motor block was longer in Group D (p<0.0001). The Visual Analog Scale score when the patients complained of pain for the 1st time in post-operative period, was significantly lower in Group Das compared to Group M (p=0.016). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension in both the groups.
Conclusion: Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid block significantly quickens the onset of sensory and motor blockade. It also prolongs the duration of sensory block, motor block, and post-operative analgesia.
Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd
Title: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MAGNESIUM SULFATE VERSUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE IN SUBARACHNOID BLOCK FOR INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES
Description:
Objective: The objective is to compare the efficacy of intrathecal magnesium sulfate versus intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of spinal anesthesia characteristics and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing infra-umbillical surgeries.
Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, hundred adult patients in the age group of 18–65 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 and 2, posted for infra-umbilical surgeries under subarachnoid block were included.
Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each after obtaining Hospital ethical committee approval and Informed consent.
Group M (50 patients) was given Inj.
Bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.
5% (heavy) 15 mg+Inj.
Magnesium Sulfate 50 mg (0.
1 mL) and Group D (50 patients) were given Inj.
Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.
5% (heavy) 15 mg+Inj.
Dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.
1 mL).
Hemodynamic parameters, onset, and duration of sensory blockade, time taken to reach the highest dermatomal level (T1) of sensory blockade, time taken to achieve motor blockade (Modified Bromage score 3), duration of sensory analgesia (Regression to L1), time to complete motor block recovery and duration post-operative analgesia were recorded.
Results: Time taken for onset of sensory block, to achieve the highest dermatomal level of sensory blockade, onset of motor block and to achieve Bromage score 3 were less in Group D as compared to that of Group M (p<0.
0001).
The total duration of sensory blockade and motor block was longer in Group D (p<0.
0001).
The Visual Analog Scale score when the patients complained of pain for the 1st time in post-operative period, was significantly lower in Group Das compared to Group M (p=0.
016).
There was no significant difference in the rate of complications such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension in both the groups.
Conclusion: Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in subarachnoid block significantly quickens the onset of sensory and motor blockade.
It also prolongs the duration of sensory block, motor block, and post-operative analgesia.
Related Results
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for p...
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the neuraxial regional anesthesia technique used in infraumbilical surgeries such as inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hysterectomy, and lower limb surge...
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
To compare the efficacy of hyperbaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) versus hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in the subarachnoid block for infraumbilical surgeries
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the neuraxial regional anesthesia technique used in infraumbilical surgeries such as inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hysterectomy, and lower limb surge...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.5% BUPIVACAINE HEAVY VERSUS 0.5% BUPIVACAINE HEAVY PLUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.5% BUPIVACAINE HEAVY VERSUS 0.5% BUPIVACAINE HEAVY PLUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA FOR INFRAUMBILICAL SURGERIES: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY
Background: Ensuring appropriate intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative pain management for infraumbilical surgery remains a signicant
challenge. However, the use of adjuvant...

