Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
View through CrossRef
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration of intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine has been reported to produce no neurotoxicity in sheep. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combining intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine for the relief of pain in patients after cesarean delivery.
Methods
After giving their consents, 80 parturients who were scheduled for cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia were enrolled by a double-blind randomized design into four groups: bupivacaine group (n = 20) received intrathecal (IT) 10 mg bupivacaine; bupivacaine + neostigmine group (n = 19) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine; bupivacaine + clonidine group (n = 20) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 150 μg clonidine; and bupivacaine + both (n = 21) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine + 150 μg clonidine. The maximum spread of anesthesia, duration of analgesia and motor block, vital signs, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 14 hours postinjection. Fifty milligrams intramuscular meperidine was given as a rescue analgesic whenever patient's pain score was greater than 5/10 by the visual analog scale.
Results
The demographic data were similar for all four groups. Bupivacaine + both group had a significantly higher maximum spread of anesthesia of 23.3 ± 2.9 segments than bupivacaine group of 20.5 ± 2.9 segment. Bupivacaine + both group showed a later onset of postsurgical pain of 6.5 ± 1.5 hours as compared to bupivacaine group of 1.3 ± 0.6 hours. The pain score in bupivacaine + both group was significantly lower than that of bupivacaine group during the first 10 hours. The 24-hour meperidine consumption also was lower in bupivacaine + both group than that of bupivacaine group. However, motor block was significantly prolonged from 3.5 ± 1.1 hours in bupivacaine group to 7.1 ± 1.6 hours in bupivacaine + both group. In addition, other side effects such as nausea and vomiting and dizziness were significantly increased in bupivacaine + both group.
Conclusion
Our study showed that the combination of 150 μg IT clonidine and 50 μg neostigmine provided longer postsurgical analgesia than with either drug used alone. However, this combination also produced significantly more adverse effects of prolonged motor block and nausea and vomiting. A further study combining the two study drugs but using a lower dose of IT neostigmine (e.g., 25 μg) is recommended.
Title: Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Description:
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans.
The concurrent administration of intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine has been reported to produce no neurotoxicity in sheep.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combining intrathecal neostigmine and clonidine for the relief of pain in patients after cesarean delivery.
Methods
After giving their consents, 80 parturients who were scheduled for cesarean delivery during spinal anesthesia were enrolled by a double-blind randomized design into four groups: bupivacaine group (n = 20) received intrathecal (IT) 10 mg bupivacaine; bupivacaine + neostigmine group (n = 19) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine; bupivacaine + clonidine group (n = 20) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 150 μg clonidine; and bupivacaine + both (n = 21) received IT 10 mg bupivacaine + 50 μg neostigmine + 150 μg clonidine.
The maximum spread of anesthesia, duration of analgesia and motor block, vital signs, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded for 14 hours postinjection.
Fifty milligrams intramuscular meperidine was given as a rescue analgesic whenever patient's pain score was greater than 5/10 by the visual analog scale.
Results
The demographic data were similar for all four groups.
Bupivacaine + both group had a significantly higher maximum spread of anesthesia of 23.
3 ± 2.
9 segments than bupivacaine group of 20.
5 ± 2.
9 segment.
Bupivacaine + both group showed a later onset of postsurgical pain of 6.
5 ± 1.
5 hours as compared to bupivacaine group of 1.
3 ± 0.
6 hours.
The pain score in bupivacaine + both group was significantly lower than that of bupivacaine group during the first 10 hours.
The 24-hour meperidine consumption also was lower in bupivacaine + both group than that of bupivacaine group.
However, motor block was significantly prolonged from 3.
5 ± 1.
1 hours in bupivacaine group to 7.
1 ± 1.
6 hours in bupivacaine + both group.
In addition, other side effects such as nausea and vomiting and dizziness were significantly increased in bupivacaine + both group.
Conclusion
Our study showed that the combination of 150 μg IT clonidine and 50 μg neostigmine provided longer postsurgical analgesia than with either drug used alone.
However, this combination also produced significantly more adverse effects of prolonged motor block and nausea and vomiting.
A further study combining the two study drugs but using a lower dose of IT neostigmine (e.
g.
, 25 μg) is recommended.
Related Results
A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy
A Multi-center Study of Intrathecal Neostigmine for Analgesia following Vaginal Hysterectomy
Background
Intrathecal neostigmine injection produces analgesia in volunteers and reduces hypotension from intrathecal bupivacaine in animals. Initial clinical trials w...
Analgesic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine with neostigmine or morphine among elective surgical patients in selected comprehensive specialised hospitals, Southern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study
Analgesic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine with neostigmine or morphine among elective surgical patients in selected comprehensive specialised hospitals, Southern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study
Objectives
To compare the analgesic effects of intrathecal neostigmine with bupivacaine, morphine with bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone among patients undergoi...
Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal Clonidine and Fentanyl as adjuvant: Mata Analysis of randomized control trials
Comparison of the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal Clonidine and Fentanyl as adjuvant: Mata Analysis of randomized control trials
Abstract
Background: Intrathecal clonidine and fentanyl added to bupivacaine prolongs the postoperative analgesic effects for below umbilicus surgery. However, the overall ...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Antinociceptive Interaction of Intrathecal α2-adrenergic Agonists, Tizanidine and Clonidine, with Lidocaine in Rats
Antinociceptive Interaction of Intrathecal α2-adrenergic Agonists, Tizanidine and Clonidine, with Lidocaine in Rats
Background
The intrathecal alpha2-adrenergic agonist, clonidine, has been shown to have considerable antinociceptive effect, although clonidine causes hypotension and b...
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for p...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...

