Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery

View through CrossRef
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for patient undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery. Dexmedetomidine is an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and it can prolong the motor and sensory block for long spinal anesthesia. It act by binding to presynaptic C-fiber and postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons. The analgesic action is a result of depression of release of C-fiber transmitters and hyperpolarization of postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons. Aims and Objectives: The present study compares the onset, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery. Materials and Methods: Patient was randomly grouped by close-envelope technique into the three equal group of 30 in each group. Total 90 patients were including in this study. The blind nature of the study was maintained and the study drug is given according as, Group-1: 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. (Control group), Group-2: 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mcg of fentanyl, and Group-3: 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5 mcg dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia. Results: Patients in dexmedetomidine Group-3 had a significantly longer sensory (160±18.5 min) and motor block (242±22 min) time as compared to patients in fentanyl and control group (P<0.001). The time to first request of analgesic in the post-operative period was also longer in dexmedetomidine group (245±3.6 min) when compared to bupivacaine and fentanyl in which it was 125±1.0 min and 220±2.5 min, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: We concluded that intrathecal dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia is associated with prolong motor and sensory block then fentanyl 25 μg with bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone.
Title: Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Description:
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for patient undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery.
Dexmedetomidine is an α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and it can prolong the motor and sensory block for long spinal anesthesia.
It act by binding to presynaptic C-fiber and postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons.
The analgesic action is a result of depression of release of C-fiber transmitters and hyperpolarization of postsynaptic dorsal horn neurons.
Aims and Objectives: The present study compares the onset, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery.
Materials and Methods: Patient was randomly grouped by close-envelope technique into the three equal group of 30 in each group.
Total 90 patients were including in this study.
The blind nature of the study was maintained and the study drug is given according as, Group-1: 15 mg of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.
(Control group), Group-2: 15 mg of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mcg of fentanyl, and Group-3: 15 mg of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 5 mcg dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia.
Results: Patients in dexmedetomidine Group-3 had a significantly longer sensory (160±18.
5 min) and motor block (242±22 min) time as compared to patients in fentanyl and control group (P<0.
001).
The time to first request of analgesic in the post-operative period was also longer in dexmedetomidine group (245±3.
6 min) when compared to bupivacaine and fentanyl in which it was 125±1.
0 min and 220±2.
5 min, respectively (P<0.
001).
Conclusion: We concluded that intrathecal dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia is associated with prolong motor and sensory block then fentanyl 25 μg with bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone.

Related Results

Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparing intrathecal dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in orthopedic cancer surgeries: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Background & objectives: The anesthetists have been trying various adjuvants with local anesthetic agents for spinal anesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia and to redu...
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
Differential Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine: A Comparative Study
Differential Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl Added to Bupivacaine: A Comparative Study
Background: Intrathecal adjuvants are commonly used to enhance the efficacy of spinal anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, and fentanyl, an opioid, have shown ben...
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Block Quality Of Dexmedetomidine-Based Spinal Anaesthesia In Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Meta-Analysis Of Clinical Trials
Background: Dexmedetomidine is used as an adjuvant to local anesthetic agents in spinal anesthesia and is believed to increase quality of sensory and motor blocks. Our aim was to a...

Back to Top