Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT

View through CrossRef
Purpose: The performance of an independent monitor unit calculation program is evaluated to verify the monitor unit (MU) for dynamic IMRT fields. The MU calculation program runs on a PC and is based on an empirical pencil‐beam model to determine D/MU. A correction methodology is used to correct for the output (head‐scatter) change for the dynamic IMRT fields. Methods and Materials: The D/MU of IMRT fields at the same point (mostly the hot spot point) was compared between treatment planning system and the independent MU calculation program. Here MU for an IMRT field refers to the total MU delivered. The fractional MU of each segment of an IMRT field, defined as the MU for the segment per total MU, was assumed to be the same. The commercial treatment planning system is based on a pencil‐beam convolution algorithm with headscatter modeling. D/MU of a subset of IMRT fields, which is delivered to a Mapcheck, were compared among the treatment planning system calculation, the independent MU calculations, and measurements. Results: Among the 10 patients examined, the difference of D/MU for all IMRT fields delivered to a point agreed to within 7% for 90% of patients. This error is slightly worse then the measurement, where 100% of patients are within 7% limit. However, when each individual IMRT field is examined, 15.6% (25/160) of the fields have a discrepancy larger than 7%. All those fields (>7%) lie in the valley region of an IMRT field. Conclusion: The independent MU calculation program can effectively verify the dose calculation accuracy for most IMRT fields. Only in very rare instances, which invariably involves the calculation point to be in very low dose region, actual measurements are needed to further verify the accuracy of dose calculation for IMRT field.
Title: SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT
Description:
Purpose: The performance of an independent monitor unit calculation program is evaluated to verify the monitor unit (MU) for dynamic IMRT fields.
The MU calculation program runs on a PC and is based on an empirical pencil‐beam model to determine D/MU.
A correction methodology is used to correct for the output (head‐scatter) change for the dynamic IMRT fields.
Methods and Materials: The D/MU of IMRT fields at the same point (mostly the hot spot point) was compared between treatment planning system and the independent MU calculation program.
Here MU for an IMRT field refers to the total MU delivered.
The fractional MU of each segment of an IMRT field, defined as the MU for the segment per total MU, was assumed to be the same.
The commercial treatment planning system is based on a pencil‐beam convolution algorithm with headscatter modeling.
D/MU of a subset of IMRT fields, which is delivered to a Mapcheck, were compared among the treatment planning system calculation, the independent MU calculations, and measurements.
Results: Among the 10 patients examined, the difference of D/MU for all IMRT fields delivered to a point agreed to within 7% for 90% of patients.
This error is slightly worse then the measurement, where 100% of patients are within 7% limit.
However, when each individual IMRT field is examined, 15.
6% (25/160) of the fields have a discrepancy larger than 7%.
All those fields (>7%) lie in the valley region of an IMRT field.
Conclusion: The independent MU calculation program can effectively verify the dose calculation accuracy for most IMRT fields.
Only in very rare instances, which invariably involves the calculation point to be in very low dose region, actual measurements are needed to further verify the accuracy of dose calculation for IMRT field.

Related Results

Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Introduction: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is a widely adopted cancer treatment technique due to its precision in delivering radiation doses to tumors while minimiz...
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Abstract Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, ...
SU‐GG‐T‐161: Commissioning IMSure 3.1 for IMRT Second Calculation Utility Program
SU‐GG‐T‐161: Commissioning IMSure 3.1 for IMRT Second Calculation Utility Program
Purpose: A program for IMRT QA for dose point calculation (IMSure Ver 3.1 from Standard Imaging) was commissioned for applications at our clinic. The purpose of this study was to s...
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
ObjectiveEvaluate the trends of use of IMRT for head and neck cancer (HNC), with emphasis on Medicare reimbursement patterns and their effect on clinical use.MethodAll patients are...
SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis
SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis
Purpose: 4D IMRT was a technique developed to account for dosimetry errors from intra‐fraction motion, especially from anatomy transformation caused by respiration. To perform 4D I...

Back to Top