Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis

View through CrossRef
Purpose: 4D IMRT was a technique developed to account for dosimetry errors from intra‐fraction motion, especially from anatomy transformation caused by respiration. To perform 4D IMRT dose validation some dynamic phantoms are used. Measurements with dynamic phantom involve the complex setting procedure. In order to simplify the QA procedure and quickly check the IMRT plan, a 4D IMRT verification tool was developed. The delivered fluence map to a moving target can be simulated from dynamic log (Dynalog) files using this tool. Method and Materials: A 4D CT was acquired for the patient. The breathing cycle was divided into 10 phases. An IMRT plan was generated for the exhale phase, and its leaf sequence was exported. The original leaf sequence was modified by superimposing the tumor trajectory onto the leaf trajectory in a two dimensional beam's eye view plane. The modified leaf sequence was delivered by Varian 2100 CD with Millenium 120 leaf MLC. After dose delivery Dynalog files were analyzed by an in‐house software to simulate the fluence map of a moving target. The fluence map measured by the dynamic phantom was compared with the simulation of delivered fluence map. Results: The comparison between the measured fluence map using the dynamic phantom and the simulated fluence map by Dynalog files shows that the difference of isodose lines was within 3mm and the difference of line profiles was within 3%. Conclusion: A 4D IMRT QA tool was developed to simulate the delivered fluence map to a moving target. The simulated fluence map shows a good agreement with the measured fluence map based on dynamic phantom measurements. When compared to phantom measurement, this tool can assist to quickly check the 4D IMRT plan and handle irregular tumor trajectories.
Title: SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis
Description:
Purpose: 4D IMRT was a technique developed to account for dosimetry errors from intra‐fraction motion, especially from anatomy transformation caused by respiration.
To perform 4D IMRT dose validation some dynamic phantoms are used.
Measurements with dynamic phantom involve the complex setting procedure.
In order to simplify the QA procedure and quickly check the IMRT plan, a 4D IMRT verification tool was developed.
The delivered fluence map to a moving target can be simulated from dynamic log (Dynalog) files using this tool.
Method and Materials: A 4D CT was acquired for the patient.
The breathing cycle was divided into 10 phases.
An IMRT plan was generated for the exhale phase, and its leaf sequence was exported.
The original leaf sequence was modified by superimposing the tumor trajectory onto the leaf trajectory in a two dimensional beam's eye view plane.
The modified leaf sequence was delivered by Varian 2100 CD with Millenium 120 leaf MLC.
After dose delivery Dynalog files were analyzed by an in‐house software to simulate the fluence map of a moving target.
The fluence map measured by the dynamic phantom was compared with the simulation of delivered fluence map.
Results: The comparison between the measured fluence map using the dynamic phantom and the simulated fluence map by Dynalog files shows that the difference of isodose lines was within 3mm and the difference of line profiles was within 3%.
Conclusion: A 4D IMRT QA tool was developed to simulate the delivered fluence map to a moving target.
The simulated fluence map shows a good agreement with the measured fluence map based on dynamic phantom measurements.
When compared to phantom measurement, this tool can assist to quickly check the 4D IMRT plan and handle irregular tumor trajectories.

Related Results

Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...
Test file
Test file
Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file.Test file....
SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT
SU‐GG‐T‐211: An Independent MU Calculation Program for Dynamic IMRT
Purpose: The performance of an independent monitor unit calculation program is evaluated to verify the monitor unit (MU) for dynamic IMRT fields. The MU calculation program runs on...
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Metaheuristic-Based IMRT Optimization for Lung Cancer Treatment under Respiratory Motion
Introduction: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) is a widely adopted cancer treatment technique due to its precision in delivering radiation doses to tumors while minimiz...
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Abstract Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, ...
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
ObjectiveEvaluate the trends of use of IMRT for head and neck cancer (HNC), with emphasis on Medicare reimbursement patterns and their effect on clinical use.MethodAll patients are...

Back to Top