Javascript must be enabled to continue!
SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis
View through CrossRef
Purpose: 4D IMRT was a technique developed to account for dosimetry errors from intra‐fraction motion, especially from anatomy transformation caused by respiration. To perform 4D IMRT dose validation some dynamic phantoms are used. Measurements with dynamic phantom involve the complex setting procedure. In order to simplify the QA procedure and quickly check the IMRT plan, a 4D IMRT verification tool was developed. The delivered fluence map to a moving target can be simulated from dynamic log (Dynalog) files using this tool. Method and Materials: A 4D CT was acquired for the patient. The breathing cycle was divided into 10 phases. An IMRT plan was generated for the exhale phase, and its leaf sequence was exported. The original leaf sequence was modified by superimposing the tumor trajectory onto the leaf trajectory in a two dimensional beam's eye view plane. The modified leaf sequence was delivered by Varian 2100 CD with Millenium 120 leaf MLC. After dose delivery Dynalog files were analyzed by an in‐house software to simulate the fluence map of a moving target. The fluence map measured by the dynamic phantom was compared with the simulation of delivered fluence map. Results: The comparison between the measured fluence map using the dynamic phantom and the simulated fluence map by Dynalog files shows that the difference of isodose lines was within 3mm and the difference of line profiles was within 3%. Conclusion: A 4D IMRT QA tool was developed to simulate the delivered fluence map to a moving target. The simulated fluence map shows a good agreement with the measured fluence map based on dynamic phantom measurements. When compared to phantom measurement, this tool can assist to quickly check the 4D IMRT plan and handle irregular tumor trajectories.
Title: SU‐GG‐T‐149: 4D IMRT Quality Assurance (QA) by Dynamic Log File Analysis
Description:
Purpose: 4D IMRT was a technique developed to account for dosimetry errors from intra‐fraction motion, especially from anatomy transformation caused by respiration.
To perform 4D IMRT dose validation some dynamic phantoms are used.
Measurements with dynamic phantom involve the complex setting procedure.
In order to simplify the QA procedure and quickly check the IMRT plan, a 4D IMRT verification tool was developed.
The delivered fluence map to a moving target can be simulated from dynamic log (Dynalog) files using this tool.
Method and Materials: A 4D CT was acquired for the patient.
The breathing cycle was divided into 10 phases.
An IMRT plan was generated for the exhale phase, and its leaf sequence was exported.
The original leaf sequence was modified by superimposing the tumor trajectory onto the leaf trajectory in a two dimensional beam's eye view plane.
The modified leaf sequence was delivered by Varian 2100 CD with Millenium 120 leaf MLC.
After dose delivery Dynalog files were analyzed by an in‐house software to simulate the fluence map of a moving target.
The fluence map measured by the dynamic phantom was compared with the simulation of delivered fluence map.
Results: The comparison between the measured fluence map using the dynamic phantom and the simulated fluence map by Dynalog files shows that the difference of isodose lines was within 3mm and the difference of line profiles was within 3%.
Conclusion: A 4D IMRT QA tool was developed to simulate the delivered fluence map to a moving target.
The simulated fluence map shows a good agreement with the measured fluence map based on dynamic phantom measurements.
When compared to phantom measurement, this tool can assist to quickly check the 4D IMRT plan and handle irregular tumor trajectories.
Related Results
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT
Background:
Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...
Dosimetric comparative study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and ThreeDimensional Conformal Radiation therapy (3DCRT) for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Left breast cancer patients
Dosimetric comparative study of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and ThreeDimensional Conformal Radiation therapy (3DCRT) for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in Left breast cancer patients
Purpose: To evaluate the difference in planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose to the organs at risk
(OAR) by using three different planning methods for the same patient-Vol...
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, ...
SU‐C‐211‐04: Evaluation of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Plan Quality Delivered with and Without Flattening Filter Using Pareto Optimal Fronts
SU‐C‐211‐04: Evaluation of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Plan Quality Delivered with and Without Flattening Filter Using Pareto Optimal Fronts
Purpose: To evaluate treatment plan quality of IMRT and VMAT plans for high energy photon beams delivered with (FF) and without (FFF) flattening filter. Methods: 9‐field IMRT and 3...
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
ObjectiveEvaluate the trends of use of IMRT for head and neck cancer (HNC), with emphasis on Medicare reimbursement patterns and their effect on clinical use.MethodAll patients are...
Dosimetric comparisons of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for left‐sided breast cancer after radical surgery
Dosimetric comparisons of intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for left‐sided breast cancer after radical surgery
AbstractObjectivePostoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer is an effective way to control tumor recurrence; however, there are advantages and disadvantages to different radiothe...
SU‐E‐T‐466: IMRT QA Technique Comparison between Single‐Gantry‐Angle Composite (SGAC) and Patient‐Gantry Angle Using MapCheckTM with Isocentric Mounting Fixture Tool
SU‐E‐T‐466: IMRT QA Technique Comparison between Single‐Gantry‐Angle Composite (SGAC) and Patient‐Gantry Angle Using MapCheckTM with Isocentric Mounting Fixture Tool
Purpose: This study is to evaluate the difference between two QA IMRT techniques(single‐gantry‐angle composite and patient‐gantry angle) of patient delivery plan. Methods: 7 Head‐a...

