Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Study of various adhesive systems’ bond strength for bracket placement

View through CrossRef
Relevance . Today, the dental market offers a large selection of adhesive systems developed based on various concepts. Improving adhesive technology in orthodontic practice is aimed at simplifying methods of use, improving the composition and ability of adhesion of orthodontic elements to the tooth structure. The aim of this study is to compare the shear bonding strength of different generations of adhesive systems for metal brackets placement. Materials and Methods . The study sample consisted of 40 recently extracted human upper premolars. The premolars were divided into four groups 10 each. The first group used the bond Transbond XT 3M Unitek (USA), the second - Beauty Ortho Bond (Japan), the third - Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) (USA) with acid etching with phosphoric acid (LI), the fourth - Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) (USA) without acid etching with phosphoric acid. The study used metal brackets for upper premolars (Gemini Bracket MBT, 3M Unitek, USA) with a micro-patterned base, the area of which was defined as 10.61 mm2. Mechanical shear strength tests were carried out using the Instron Universal Test machine (USA). One-way analysis of variance and the TUKEY test were used to examine significant differences in adhesive strength and shear strength between study groups. Results and Discussion. The highest adhesive shear strength was established when using the Transbond XT adhesive system (12.28 MPa) and the Tetric N Bond Universal system using the total etching (12.66 MPa) and self-etching (11.44 MPa) techniques; statistically significant differences between these adhesives were not detected. The second group of Beauty Ortho Bond (5.34 MPa) demonstrated the lowest adhesion force among the studied adhesives, with a statistically significant difference from the other groups. Conclusion : This study concluded that there are no notable differences in the comparison of the universal system with or without etching with the Transbond system. Regarding the use of the beauty Ortho bond, it obtained the lowest strength with significant difference from the remaining groups.
Title: Study of various adhesive systems’ bond strength for bracket placement
Description:
Relevance .
Today, the dental market offers a large selection of adhesive systems developed based on various concepts.
Improving adhesive technology in orthodontic practice is aimed at simplifying methods of use, improving the composition and ability of adhesion of orthodontic elements to the tooth structure.
The aim of this study is to compare the shear bonding strength of different generations of adhesive systems for metal brackets placement.
Materials and Methods .
The study sample consisted of 40 recently extracted human upper premolars.
The premolars were divided into four groups 10 each.
The first group used the bond Transbond XT 3M Unitek (USA), the second - Beauty Ortho Bond (Japan), the third - Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) (USA) with acid etching with phosphoric acid (LI), the fourth - Tetric N bond Universal (Vivapen) (USA) without acid etching with phosphoric acid.
The study used metal brackets for upper premolars (Gemini Bracket MBT, 3M Unitek, USA) with a micro-patterned base, the area of which was defined as 10.
61 mm2.
Mechanical shear strength tests were carried out using the Instron Universal Test machine (USA).
One-way analysis of variance and the TUKEY test were used to examine significant differences in adhesive strength and shear strength between study groups.
Results and Discussion.
The highest adhesive shear strength was established when using the Transbond XT adhesive system (12.
28 MPa) and the Tetric N Bond Universal system using the total etching (12.
66 MPa) and self-etching (11.
44 MPa) techniques; statistically significant differences between these adhesives were not detected.
The second group of Beauty Ortho Bond (5.
34 MPa) demonstrated the lowest adhesion force among the studied adhesives, with a statistically significant difference from the other groups.
Conclusion : This study concluded that there are no notable differences in the comparison of the universal system with or without etching with the Transbond system.
Regarding the use of the beauty Ortho bond, it obtained the lowest strength with significant difference from the remaining groups.

Related Results

Comparison of the Initial Repeated Bond Strength among Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems
Comparison of the Initial Repeated Bond Strength among Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems
One of the problems that often occurred during orthodontic treatment is bracket failure. This is usually the result either of the patient’s accidentally, applying inappropriate for...
Effect of water storage and hydrophobic adhesive �ayer app�ication on the bond strength of all-in-one adhesives
Effect of water storage and hydrophobic adhesive �ayer app�ication on the bond strength of all-in-one adhesives
To prevent the rate of water absorption and degradation of exposed collagen and the resin matrix on the hybrid layers, the use of an additional layer of hydrophobic resin on all-in...
Effects of bracket design on critical contact angle
Effects of bracket design on critical contact angle
ABSTRACT Objective: To explore how the position of the bracket slots relative to the archwire influences the friction between them, and how bracket des...
Shear Bond Strength of a Mechanically Retained Ceramic Bracket
Shear Bond Strength of a Mechanically Retained Ceramic Bracket
Abstract The failure under shear loading of mechanically retained ceramic brackets bonded to enamel was investigated. One light-activated dual-c...
Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatment and Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets
Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatment and Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets
Objective. This study evaluated the effect of ceramic surface treatments on bond strength of metal brackets to machinable ceramics and veneering porcelain using different adhesive ...
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to deep dentin
Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to deep dentin
Introduction and objective: Self-adhesive resin cements are applied in only one clinical step whose technique is considered less sensitive and of easy handling. However, there is s...

Back to Top