Javascript must be enabled to continue!
CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS OF LATGALIAN ETHNO-POLITICAL IDENTITY IN MODERN LATVIAN SOCIETY
View through CrossRef
Latgalians are an ethnic group located in Latvia characterized could be characterized by an extremely undefined status. In the public discourse there are two narratives, that are opposite in meaning, constructing which form the ethnopolitical status of the people of Latagle and their historical memory. The first reflects the official position of the Latvian state, and is based on the non-recognition of Latgalians as an independent ethnic group. Also, interoperating the Latgalian language is viewed as a variant of the Latvian language and there is historical reference to the 1917 Latgale Congress that united Latvia. The opposite narrative affirms asserts the historical and cultural autonomy of the Latgalian people and the independence of the Latgalian language, based on the history of the struggle for the political autonomy of Latgale and the historical memory of discrimination by the Latvian majority as well. The article analyzes the fundamental factors contributing to irreparable the unavoidable uncertainty of in the construction of Latgalian identity and the impracticability of both political narratives. The limited and insufficient logic of postcolonial theory, which is regularly used to characterize ethnopolitical processes in the post-Soviet space and, in particular, in Latvia is shown in the article. It is concluded that the fundamental uncertainty factors of Latgalian identity, intensified by the action could be reinforced by the action of European integration processes, impede the possibility of political mobilization based on both nationalist state policy and the idea of Latgalian ethnopolitical autonomy.
Title: CONFLICT OF INTERPRETATIONS OF LATGALIAN ETHNO-POLITICAL IDENTITY IN MODERN LATVIAN SOCIETY
Description:
Latgalians are an ethnic group located in Latvia characterized could be characterized by an extremely undefined status.
In the public discourse there are two narratives, that are opposite in meaning, constructing which form the ethnopolitical status of the people of Latagle and their historical memory.
The first reflects the official position of the Latvian state, and is based on the non-recognition of Latgalians as an independent ethnic group.
Also, interoperating the Latgalian language is viewed as a variant of the Latvian language and there is historical reference to the 1917 Latgale Congress that united Latvia.
The opposite narrative affirms asserts the historical and cultural autonomy of the Latgalian people and the independence of the Latgalian language, based on the history of the struggle for the political autonomy of Latgale and the historical memory of discrimination by the Latvian majority as well.
The article analyzes the fundamental factors contributing to irreparable the unavoidable uncertainty of in the construction of Latgalian identity and the impracticability of both political narratives.
The limited and insufficient logic of postcolonial theory, which is regularly used to characterize ethnopolitical processes in the post-Soviet space and, in particular, in Latvia is shown in the article.
It is concluded that the fundamental uncertainty factors of Latgalian identity, intensified by the action could be reinforced by the action of European integration processes, impede the possibility of political mobilization based on both nationalist state policy and the idea of Latgalian ethnopolitical autonomy.
Related Results
THE WAY TO LATGALIAN LITERATURE DURING THE 90s OF THE 20TH CENTURY
THE WAY TO LATGALIAN LITERATURE DURING THE 90s OF THE 20TH CENTURY
During the 90s of the 20th century revival of Latgalian literature took place in the Republic of Latvia. It was a gradual process; in 2001 in “History of Latvian Literature" create...
ELEMENTS OF GLOACALIZATION IN LATGALIAN MUSIC
ELEMENTS OF GLOACALIZATION IN LATGALIAN MUSIC
<p><em>Latgalian music has a distinct place within the Latvian music market, which has itself inhabited a niche within the global music marketplace; the various process...
Darbības vārdu raksturojums Miķeļa Bukša gramatikā latgaliešu rakstu valodas kontekstā
Darbības vārdu raksturojums Miķeļa Bukša gramatikā latgaliešu rakstu valodas kontekstā
The Latgalian written language, based on Latgalian vernaculars of the High Latvian dialect, began to develop at the start of the 18th century in Latgale. Many sacred and secular wo...
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
METAPHORICAL REPRESENTATION OF THE CONCEPT CONFLICT IN AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON IMAGE METAPHORS)
The article is devoted to the metaphorical representation of the concept CONFLICT in the English-language political discourse, namely American and British. The figurative content o...
LATVIAN ORNAMENTS. GENESIS OF THE TRADITION (1869–1924)
LATVIAN ORNAMENTS. GENESIS OF THE TRADITION (1869–1924)
In 19th century Latvia, as elsewhere in Europe, peasants’ dress featured ornamental motifs. In the initial decades of the 20th century, some specific visual symbols were extracted ...
Latvian Grammar
Latvian Grammar
“Latvian Grammar” was written to make information about the Latvian language and its grammatical system more easily available not only within Latvia, but also beyond its borders. A...
SOLUTIONS FOR LATGALIAN ORTHOGRAPHY PROBLEMS IN THE PRESS IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE 20th CENTURY
SOLUTIONS FOR LATGALIAN ORTHOGRAPHY PROBLEMS IN THE PRESS IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE 20th CENTURY
As soon as the ban on printing was abolished, one particular solution for the question of Latgalian orthography was found. However, it could not satisfy all language users, since i...
SOCIOCULTURAL IDENTITY POSTMODERN: PROBLEM OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
SOCIOCULTURAL IDENTITY POSTMODERN: PROBLEM OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
Problem setting. The relevance of our study is due to the excessive popularity of the concept of «socio-cultural identity» as a scientific term and tool for studying the postmodern...

