Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Public security in classical ancient greek political and legal thought (teachings of socrates, plato, aristotle)

View through CrossRef
The aim of the article is to carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of key features of general philosophical and special legal understanding and interpretation of human, social and state security problems in the history of political and legal scholars of ancient times, in particular on the basis of scientific research of ancient Greek authors, opinions of that period, against the background of widespread collective ideas about security as a state of social relations, the condition of human (social) life and/or a kind of social value, objects (spheres) of this security, as well as subjects and regulatory mechanisms to ensure the appropriate state of society and the state. It is shown, that the ancient Greek political and legal thought demonstrates a wide panorama of original views on the formation, development, functioning and guarantee of public and personal, internal and external, military and international, political and economic security in the context of political and legal concepts that reflect complex dialectics. and the interaction of the individual, society, law and the state. It has been found, that the ancient Greek political and legal thought raises questions about the essence of public security. The matter of public security is an essential function of the state, which is realized by it both in the external sphere (military and foreign political security) and within the country (internal or domestic political security). Developed at the theoretical and philosophical level, the idea of good governance (Democritus, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius) is the idea of guaranteeing its security: bad governance - the key to the decline and collapse of the state, the death of its citizens. The philosophical concepts of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the most fundamental for the further development of political and legal models of public security
Private Company Technology Center
Title: Public security in classical ancient greek political and legal thought (teachings of socrates, plato, aristotle)
Description:
The aim of the article is to carry out the theoretical and legal analysis of key features of general philosophical and special legal understanding and interpretation of human, social and state security problems in the history of political and legal scholars of ancient times, in particular on the basis of scientific research of ancient Greek authors, opinions of that period, against the background of widespread collective ideas about security as a state of social relations, the condition of human (social) life and/or a kind of social value, objects (spheres) of this security, as well as subjects and regulatory mechanisms to ensure the appropriate state of society and the state.
It is shown, that the ancient Greek political and legal thought demonstrates a wide panorama of original views on the formation, development, functioning and guarantee of public and personal, internal and external, military and international, political and economic security in the context of political and legal concepts that reflect complex dialectics.
and the interaction of the individual, society, law and the state.
It has been found, that the ancient Greek political and legal thought raises questions about the essence of public security.
The matter of public security is an essential function of the state, which is realized by it both in the external sphere (military and foreign political security) and within the country (internal or domestic political security).
Developed at the theoretical and philosophical level, the idea of good governance (Democritus, Plato, Aristotle, Polybius) is the idea of guaranteeing its security: bad governance - the key to the decline and collapse of the state, the death of its citizens.
The philosophical concepts of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the most fundamental for the further development of political and legal models of public security.

Related Results

Socrates
Socrates
Socrates of Athens (470/469–399 bce) is perhaps the most famous philosopher of all time. Yet there is a striking contrast between his extraordinary celebrity and what we know for c...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to Plato who...
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
The Apology of Socrates takes its name from Plato’s version of the defense speech (Greek, apologia) given by Socrates at his trial. The date of its composition is unknown, but the ...
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
Plato and Aristotle in the Academy
This chapter considers Aristotle’s criticisms of Plato. Among these are (1) Aristotle raises doubts about and rejects aspects of Plato’s theory of Forms, (2) Aristotle dismisses Pl...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?
AbstractThis book breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the ...
Public security in the pre-classical political and legal thought of ancient Greece
Public security in the pre-classical political and legal thought of ancient Greece
A thorough theoretical and legal study of the key features of general philosophical and special legal understanding and interpretation of security issues of man, society and state ...
Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues. All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discus...

Back to Top