Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge

View through CrossRef
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues. All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discussed. It is shown that, in particular, alleged avowals of knowledge have been variously misinterpreted. The evidence either does not concern ethical knowledge or its interpretation has been distorted by abstraction of the passage from context or through failure adequately to appreciate the rhetorical dimensions of the context or the author's dramaturgical interests. Still, six sincere Socratic avowals or assumptions of ethical knowledge occur among the early dialogues. Moreover, it is maintained that in a number of these texts Socrates is committed to the epistemological priority of definitional knowledge of excellence for pertinent non-definitional knowledge (for example, that knowledge of the definition of justice is necessary for knowledge of instances of justice). Thus, there are inconsistencies among Socrates' avowals and disavowals of ethical knowledge. It is argued that the most important recent attempts to resolve Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge (for example, Vlastos's) fail. A novel interpretation is then offered that depends upon a fundamental adjustment in the interpretation of Socrates' utterances in the texts. The practice of assembling all of Socrates' topic-relevant utterances, divorced from context, and attempting to distill from these consistent philosophical principles is rejected as naïve. In contrast, it is argued that Plato uses Socrates in various ways in various texts in order to achieve certain pedagogical objectives. Accordingly, Socrates' utterances do not all have the same hermeneutic status. On this depends the correct interpretation of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as the general epistemological, specifically ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance in the early dialogues. The paper concludes with an explanation of the function of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as an account of the ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance among the early dialogues.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
Description:
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues.
All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discussed.
It is shown that, in particular, alleged avowals of knowledge have been variously misinterpreted.
The evidence either does not concern ethical knowledge or its interpretation has been distorted by abstraction of the passage from context or through failure adequately to appreciate the rhetorical dimensions of the context or the author's dramaturgical interests.
Still, six sincere Socratic avowals or assumptions of ethical knowledge occur among the early dialogues.
Moreover, it is maintained that in a number of these texts Socrates is committed to the epistemological priority of definitional knowledge of excellence for pertinent non-definitional knowledge (for example, that knowledge of the definition of justice is necessary for knowledge of instances of justice).
Thus, there are inconsistencies among Socrates' avowals and disavowals of ethical knowledge.
It is argued that the most important recent attempts to resolve Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge (for example, Vlastos's) fail.
A novel interpretation is then offered that depends upon a fundamental adjustment in the interpretation of Socrates' utterances in the texts.
The practice of assembling all of Socrates' topic-relevant utterances, divorced from context, and attempting to distill from these consistent philosophical principles is rejected as naïve.
In contrast, it is argued that Plato uses Socrates in various ways in various texts in order to achieve certain pedagogical objectives.
Accordingly, Socrates' utterances do not all have the same hermeneutic status.
On this depends the correct interpretation of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as the general epistemological, specifically ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance in the early dialogues.
The paper concludes with an explanation of the function of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as an account of the ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance among the early dialogues.

Related Results

Reading Xenophon's Symposium
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
In just over a decade, interest in Xenophon'sSymposiumhas risen dramatically. No longer the poor relation to its author's more popular Socratic works or to Plato's dialogue of the ...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to Plato who...
Socrates (469–399 BCE)
Socrates (469–399 BCE)
Abstract We know little about Socrates, who so changed the course of philosophy that those who preceded him are called Presocratics. Tradition tells us one way Socrates d...
KNOWLEDGE IN PRACTICE
KNOWLEDGE IN PRACTICE
Knowledge is an understanding of someone or something, such as facts, information, descriptions or skills, which is acquired by individuals through education, learning, experience ...
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
Sokrates og oss: Et essay om Sokrates’ forsvarstale, tekstfortolkning og filosofihistorie
<p><em>Socrates and Us: An Essay on the </em>Apology of Socrates<em>, Philological Interpretations and History of Philosophy. </em>I start out with a ...
Maximos von Tyros und Apologie des Sokrates
Maximos von Tyros und Apologie des Sokrates
The third speech of Maximus of Tyre “Whether Socrates was right not to speak in his own defence” was little researched, although it is an original text connected with the tradition...
Socrates on virtue and selfknowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines' Alcibiades
Socrates on virtue and selfknowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines' Alcibiades
The paper focuses on the concepts of virtue and self-knowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines’ Alcibiades, which are marked by striking similarities in the way they discuss these th...

Back to Top