Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues. All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discussed. It is shown that, in particular, alleged avowals of knowledge have been variously misinterpreted. The evidence either does not concern ethical knowledge or its interpretation has been distorted by abstraction of the passage from context or through failure adequately to appreciate the rhetorical dimensions of the context or the author's dramaturgical interests. Still, six sincere Socratic avowals or assumptions of ethical knowledge occur among the early dialogues. Moreover, it is maintained that in a number of these texts Socrates is committed to the epistemological priority of definitional knowledge of excellence for pertinent non-definitional knowledge (for example, that knowledge of the definition of justice is necessary for knowledge of instances of justice). Thus, there are inconsistencies among Socrates' avowals and disavowals of ethical knowledge. It is argued that the most important recent attempts to resolve Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge (for example, Vlastos's) fail. A novel interpretation is then offered that depends upon a fundamental adjustment in the interpretation of Socrates' utterances in the texts. The practice of assembling all of Socrates' topic-relevant utterances, divorced from context, and attempting to distill from these consistent philosophical principles is rejected as naïve. In contrast, it is argued that Plato uses Socrates in various ways in various texts in order to achieve certain pedagogical objectives. Accordingly, Socrates' utterances do not all have the same hermeneutic status. On this depends the correct interpretation of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as the general epistemological, specifically ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance in the early dialogues. The paper concludes with an explanation of the function of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as an account of the ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance among the early dialogues.
Title: Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
Description:
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues.
All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discussed.
It is shown that, in particular, alleged avowals of knowledge have been variously misinterpreted.
The evidence either does not concern ethical knowledge or its interpretation has been distorted by abstraction of the passage from context or through failure adequately to appreciate the rhetorical dimensions of the context or the author's dramaturgical interests.
Still, six sincere Socratic avowals or assumptions of ethical knowledge occur among the early dialogues.
Moreover, it is maintained that in a number of these texts Socrates is committed to the epistemological priority of definitional knowledge of excellence for pertinent non-definitional knowledge (for example, that knowledge of the definition of justice is necessary for knowledge of instances of justice).
Thus, there are inconsistencies among Socrates' avowals and disavowals of ethical knowledge.
It is argued that the most important recent attempts to resolve Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge (for example, Vlastos's) fail.
A novel interpretation is then offered that depends upon a fundamental adjustment in the interpretation of Socrates' utterances in the texts.
The practice of assembling all of Socrates' topic-relevant utterances, divorced from context, and attempting to distill from these consistent philosophical principles is rejected as naïve.
In contrast, it is argued that Plato uses Socrates in various ways in various texts in order to achieve certain pedagogical objectives.
Accordingly, Socrates' utterances do not all have the same hermeneutic status.
On this depends the correct interpretation of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as the general epistemological, specifically ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance in the early dialogues.
The paper concludes with an explanation of the function of Socrates' occasional avowals of ethical knowledge as well as an account of the ethical epistemological commitments that Plato intended to advance among the early dialogues.
Related Results
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
The Apology of Socrates takes its name from Plato’s version of the defense speech (Greek, apologia) given by Socrates at his trial. The date of its composition is unknown, but the ...
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
In just over a decade, interest in Xenophon'sSymposiumhas risen dramatically. No longer the poor relation to its author's more popular Socratic works or to Plato's dialogue of the ...
Socrates and Hedonism
Socrates and Hedonism
Abstract
The Protagoras is a puzzling dialogue in many respects, but none more puzzling than the apparent endorsement of hedonism by Socrates in the Final refutation...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract
Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to
Plato who...
A RELAÇÃO ENTRE MORTE E RETÓRICA NOS NOS DIÁLOGOS: GÓRGIAS E APOLOGIA DE SÓCRATES
A RELAÇÃO ENTRE MORTE E RETÓRICA NOS NOS DIÁLOGOS: GÓRGIAS E APOLOGIA DE SÓCRATES
No diálogo Górgias, Sócrates não parece disposto a aceitar incondicionalmente a beleza, o poder e a grandeza da retórica, tampouco a sabedoria de Górgias. Ele coloca, através de se...

