Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Socrates on virtue and selfknowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines' Alcibiades

View through CrossRef
The paper focuses on the concepts of virtue and self-knowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines’ Alcibiades, which are marked by striking similarities in the way they discuss these themes and their interconnection. First of all, in both dialogues the notions of ἀμαθία and ἀρετή seem to be connected and both are bound up with the issue of εὐδαιμονία: Socrates points out that ἀρετήis the only source of true εὐδαιμονία and encourages Alcibiades to acquire it, stressing the need for a constant ἐπιμέλειαἑαυτοῦ. Thus, another common feature is the Socratic exhortation to pursue and achieve moral virtue, which is identified as a form of knowledge. Ultimately, in both accounts the chief means by which to contrast ἀμαθία is found in the care and knowledge of the self. The above arguments are to be considered within the particular frame of the paideutic relationship between Socrates and Alcibiades, which is itself portrayed in similar terms in the two texts. In both dialogues, the relationship is characterized as a form of erotic education and, moreover, Socrates himself links his paideutic activity to divine will. Yet, only in Aeschines’ Alcibiades does this explicitly entail the idea that Socrates transmits virtue without resorting to any τέχνη or ἐπιστήμη. So while in both cases ἀρετή is understood as a kind of knowledge, in Aeschines’ Alcibiades there seems to be a greater tension between this concept of virtue and its modes of transmis-sion, which are “anepistemic”.
Coimbra University Press
Title: Socrates on virtue and selfknowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines' Alcibiades
Description:
The paper focuses on the concepts of virtue and self-knowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines’ Alcibiades, which are marked by striking similarities in the way they discuss these themes and their interconnection.
First of all, in both dialogues the notions of ἀμαθία and ἀρετή seem to be connected and both are bound up with the issue of εὐδαιμονία: Socrates points out that ἀρετήis the only source of true εὐδαιμονία and encourages Alcibiades to acquire it, stressing the need for a constant ἐπιμέλειαἑαυτοῦ.
Thus, another common feature is the Socratic exhortation to pursue and achieve moral virtue, which is identified as a form of knowledge.
Ultimately, in both accounts the chief means by which to contrast ἀμαθία is found in the care and knowledge of the self.
The above arguments are to be considered within the particular frame of the paideutic relationship between Socrates and Alcibiades, which is itself portrayed in similar terms in the two texts.
In both dialogues, the relationship is characterized as a form of erotic education and, moreover, Socrates himself links his paideutic activity to divine will.
Yet, only in Aeschines’ Alcibiades does this explicitly entail the idea that Socrates transmits virtue without resorting to any τέχνη or ἐπιστήμη.
So while in both cases ἀρετή is understood as a kind of knowledge, in Aeschines’ Alcibiades there seems to be a greater tension between this concept of virtue and its modes of transmis-sion, which are “anepistemic”.

Related Results

Socrates
Socrates
Socrates of Athens (470/469–399 bce) is perhaps the most famous philosopher of all time. Yet there is a striking contrast between his extraordinary celebrity and what we know for c...
Stasis, felicidade e virtude na intervenção de Alcibíades no Banquete de Platão
Stasis, felicidade e virtude na intervenção de Alcibíades no Banquete de Platão
O presente artigo consiste em uma investigação a respeito da desordem psíquica (stasis), da felicidade e da virtude na intervenção de Alcibíades no Banquete de Platão. Assim, na pr...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
Against Meidias and Against Timarchus
Against Meidias and Against Timarchus
Chapter 4 juxtaposes two law-court speeches from the mid-340s: Demosthenes’ Against Meidias and Aeschines’ Against Timarchus. In both speeches, Demosthenes and Aeschines are applyi...
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
The Apology of Socrates takes its name from Plato’s version of the defense speech (Greek, apologia) given by Socrates at his trial. The date of its composition is unknown, but the ...
Plato: Alcibiades
Plato: Alcibiades
The Alcibiades was widely read in antiquity as the very best introduction to Plato. Alcibiades in his youth associated with Socrates, and went on to a spectacularly disgraceful car...
Alcibiades and the City
Alcibiades and the City
Chapter 8 examines how Plutarch constructs the relationship between Alcibiades and the city of Athens in the early part of the Life of Alcibiades (chs. 4–8). It argues that, throug...
The Rhetoric of the Graphē Paranomōn in the Trial on the Crown
The Rhetoric of the Graphē Paranomōn in the Trial on the Crown
This chapter re-examines the legal bases of the trial of Ctesiphon on the crown – the formal terms of Ctesiphon’s proposal and of Aeschines’ indictment – and their rhetorical deplo...

Back to Top