Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Socrates
View through CrossRef
Socrates of Athens (470/469–399 bce) is perhaps the most famous philosopher of all time. Yet there is a striking contrast between his extraordinary celebrity and what we know for certain about him. We know for sure that he spent his entire life in Athens, philosophizing in public and private places. We also know that he left no written works. What we know of his life and teaching comes only for a small part through the writings of contemporaries (notably Aristophanes), and mostly through the works of his many disciples, among whom stand the most prominent philosophers of the time (Plato, Antisthenes, Aristippus, Xenophon, Aeschines of Sphettos). None of these witnesses was concerned to record what Socrates did and said according to the modern standards of accurateness. Rather, each of them depicted his own view of Socrates, competing with one another as to which portrait rendered the true spirit of Socraticism. Most of what we know of Socrates also comes from later sources, which in turn depend on the writings of his contemporaries, most of which have been lost. Therefore, as a consequence of Socrates’ exceptional impact and avoidance of writing down his own thoughts, there is neither direct nor neutral access to Socrates’ life and doctrine. Every author, every school of thought, and every time period has shaped its own Socrates, according to its own agenda. Does this mean that the quest for the historical Socrates is ill-founded and the true Socrates irremediably lost? Some scholars think it does. At the very least, it seems safe to say that the study of Socrates is not separable from what is now known as the “Socratic Question.” On Socrates’ philosophical input, what does seem clear is that he introduced a major breakthrough in the history of philosophy. According to two distinct traditions in Antiquity, Socrates indeed shifted both the object and the method of philosophical inquiry. According to Cicero (and Xenophon), Socrates was the first who brought down philosophy from the heavens and placed it in cities (Tusc. V, 10). According to Aristotle (in Metaphysics), he was the first to concern himself with definitions. Both interests are amply evidenced in our main extant source of information on Socrates, which is also the trickiest to handle: the Platonic dialogues. Another reason explaining Socrates’ celebrity over the last twenty-five centuries is the most famous episode of his life, namely his death. In 399 bce, Socrates was tried, and sentenced to drink hemlock, by an Athenian popular jury of five hundred citizens. Why he was executed by the Athenian democracy remains a hotly disputed issue. Yet, even more than the portrait of Socrates as the irrepressible gadfly and soul-examiner of Athens, it is his death, and notably Plato’s dramatization of it as the martyrdom of philosophy, that made him the legend and the mystery he still is.
Title: Socrates
Description:
Socrates of Athens (470/469–399 bce) is perhaps the most famous philosopher of all time.
Yet there is a striking contrast between his extraordinary celebrity and what we know for certain about him.
We know for sure that he spent his entire life in Athens, philosophizing in public and private places.
We also know that he left no written works.
What we know of his life and teaching comes only for a small part through the writings of contemporaries (notably Aristophanes), and mostly through the works of his many disciples, among whom stand the most prominent philosophers of the time (Plato, Antisthenes, Aristippus, Xenophon, Aeschines of Sphettos).
None of these witnesses was concerned to record what Socrates did and said according to the modern standards of accurateness.
Rather, each of them depicted his own view of Socrates, competing with one another as to which portrait rendered the true spirit of Socraticism.
Most of what we know of Socrates also comes from later sources, which in turn depend on the writings of his contemporaries, most of which have been lost.
Therefore, as a consequence of Socrates’ exceptional impact and avoidance of writing down his own thoughts, there is neither direct nor neutral access to Socrates’ life and doctrine.
Every author, every school of thought, and every time period has shaped its own Socrates, according to its own agenda.
Does this mean that the quest for the historical Socrates is ill-founded and the true Socrates irremediably lost? Some scholars think it does.
At the very least, it seems safe to say that the study of Socrates is not separable from what is now known as the “Socratic Question.
” On Socrates’ philosophical input, what does seem clear is that he introduced a major breakthrough in the history of philosophy.
According to two distinct traditions in Antiquity, Socrates indeed shifted both the object and the method of philosophical inquiry.
According to Cicero (and Xenophon), Socrates was the first who brought down philosophy from the heavens and placed it in cities (Tusc.
V, 10).
According to Aristotle (in Metaphysics), he was the first to concern himself with definitions.
Both interests are amply evidenced in our main extant source of information on Socrates, which is also the trickiest to handle: the Platonic dialogues.
Another reason explaining Socrates’ celebrity over the last twenty-five centuries is the most famous episode of his life, namely his death.
In 399 bce, Socrates was tried, and sentenced to drink hemlock, by an Athenian popular jury of five hundred citizens.
Why he was executed by the Athenian democracy remains a hotly disputed issue.
Yet, even more than the portrait of Socrates as the irrepressible gadfly and soul-examiner of Athens, it is his death, and notably Plato’s dramatization of it as the martyrdom of philosophy, that made him the legend and the mystery he still is.
Related Results
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
Plato’s Apology of Socrates
The Apology of Socrates takes its name from Plato’s version of the defense speech (Greek, apologia) given by Socrates at his trial. The date of its composition is unknown, but the ...
Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
Socrates' Avowals of Knowledge
AbstractThe paper examines Socrates' avowals and disavowals of knowledge in the standardly accepted early Platonic dialogues. All of the pertinent passages are assembled and discus...
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
Reading Xenophon's Symposium
In just over a decade, interest in Xenophon'sSymposiumhas risen dramatically. No longer the poor relation to its author's more popular Socratic works or to Plato's dialogue of the ...
Socrates and Hedonism
Socrates and Hedonism
Abstract
The Protagoras is a puzzling dialogue in many respects, but none more puzzling than the apparent endorsement of hedonism by Socrates in the Final refutation...
Virtue in the Cave
Virtue in the Cave
Abstract
Offers an interpretation of Plato's Meno that seeks to illuminate the particularly “therapeutic” philosophy that Socrates practices. It argues that the Meno...
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
HUKUM KEKUAS AAN DAN DEMOKRASI MASA YUNANI KUNO
Plato and Aristotle are thinkers on the future of Greece that were raised in the Greek civilization. Aristotle is known as empirical-realist thinkers in contrast to
Plato who...
A RELAÇÃO ENTRE MORTE E RETÓRICA NOS NOS DIÁLOGOS: GÓRGIAS E APOLOGIA DE SÓCRATES
A RELAÇÃO ENTRE MORTE E RETÓRICA NOS NOS DIÁLOGOS: GÓRGIAS E APOLOGIA DE SÓCRATES
No diálogo Górgias, Sócrates não parece disposto a aceitar incondicionalmente a beleza, o poder e a grandeza da retórica, tampouco a sabedoria de Górgias. Ele coloca, através de se...

