Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Out-of-Court Redress Schemes

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter elaborates on the key concepts of out-of-court redress schemes. It focuses on alternative dispute resolution in competition cases, which are voluntary redress schemes, alternative-dispute resolution, settlement schemes, and arbitration. The aforementioned alternative dispute-resolution mechanisms allow victims to settle cases quickly and easily on a voluntary basis, therefore most systems try to promote the resolution of claims outside court. The rationale for encouraging voluntary redress schemes or consensual dispute-resolution systems correlates to the costs and uncertainty of litigation. The chapter looks into the question of the arbitrability of competition law within the US and some EU jurisdictions.
Title: Out-of-Court Redress Schemes
Description:
Abstract This chapter elaborates on the key concepts of out-of-court redress schemes.
It focuses on alternative dispute resolution in competition cases, which are voluntary redress schemes, alternative-dispute resolution, settlement schemes, and arbitration.
The aforementioned alternative dispute-resolution mechanisms allow victims to settle cases quickly and easily on a voluntary basis, therefore most systems try to promote the resolution of claims outside court.
The rationale for encouraging voluntary redress schemes or consensual dispute-resolution systems correlates to the costs and uncertainty of litigation.
The chapter looks into the question of the arbitrability of competition law within the US and some EU jurisdictions.

Related Results

Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com Abstract Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
Fontevecchia Case
Fontevecchia Case
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — American Convention on Human Rights, 1969, Article 63(1) — Remedial jurisdiction of Inter-American Court of Human R...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...
Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
Peran Pengadilan Agama Kediri Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah
The formulation of this thesis problem has three aspects, those are: (1) How is the authority of Religious Court of Kediri in resolving sharia economics disputes before the Decisio...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
Regarding the structure of criminal appeals, the judicial precedent establishes the principle of ‘appeals on points of fact,’ which stipulates that the court of the second instance...
CONTEMPT POWER: A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT’S APPROACH IN BANGLADESH
CONTEMPT POWER: A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT’S APPROACH IN BANGLADESH
So that the Court may perform its judicial function effectively, it is endowed with, inter alia, the power to punish for contempt of itself. This paper examines the Bangladesh Supr...

Back to Top