Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Was Diodorus right?
View through CrossRef
In the article, an attempt to find archaeological confirmation of the information of Agatharhides Cnides information in Diodorus Siculus regarding the election of a king has been undertaken. In particular it concerns the election of king in Meroe, whom the priests circle around, and people choose as king, the one whom god touches. The article examines the recent findings of the Italian-Russian joint archaeological mission in Abu Erteila, where a new structure of unusual orientation was discovered, located on the same axis with the Lion Temple, which was found earlier. Fragments of the steles of the kings of ancient Sudan are also analyzed, which give evidences on the election of a new king and participation of the people, historical reasons and factors influencing this process. Much still remains unclear, namely the participants and composition of the procession, the moment when God chose the king in the procession. Thus, the considered material of finds from Abu Erteila suggests that nevertheless Diodorus Siculus was right and the discovered material confirms the information of Agatharhides Cnides about the election of a king in Meroe. The priests were the protagonists of the procession, they selected the best candidates and choose as king whom the god seized while being carried about in a procession. As from which only the legs of the figures have survived in Abu Erteila, it is not possible to restore the appearance of the participants, as well as whether the applicant/s were in this procession for the throne. As far as only the legs of the figures have survived in Abu Erteila, it is not possible to restore the appearance of the participants, as well as whether the applicant/s were in this procession for the throne.
Institute of Oriental Studies Russian Academy of Sciences
Title: Was Diodorus right?
Description:
In the article, an attempt to find archaeological confirmation of the information of Agatharhides Cnides information in Diodorus Siculus regarding the election of a king has been undertaken.
In particular it concerns the election of king in Meroe, whom the priests circle around, and people choose as king, the one whom god touches.
The article examines the recent findings of the Italian-Russian joint archaeological mission in Abu Erteila, where a new structure of unusual orientation was discovered, located on the same axis with the Lion Temple, which was found earlier.
Fragments of the steles of the kings of ancient Sudan are also analyzed, which give evidences on the election of a new king and participation of the people, historical reasons and factors influencing this process.
Much still remains unclear, namely the participants and composition of the procession, the moment when God chose the king in the procession.
Thus, the considered material of finds from Abu Erteila suggests that nevertheless Diodorus Siculus was right and the discovered material confirms the information of Agatharhides Cnides about the election of a king in Meroe.
The priests were the protagonists of the procession, they selected the best candidates and choose as king whom the god seized while being carried about in a procession.
As from which only the legs of the figures have survived in Abu Erteila, it is not possible to restore the appearance of the participants, as well as whether the applicant/s were in this procession for the throne.
As far as only the legs of the figures have survived in Abu Erteila, it is not possible to restore the appearance of the participants, as well as whether the applicant/s were in this procession for the throne.
Related Results
Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity
Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity
Abstract
This article offers a study of Thomas Hobbes’s reading of Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historiographer of the 1st century bc whom Hobbes called “the greatest antiquary perhap...
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the Bibliothēkē , before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the Bibliothēkē , before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Diodorus (3) of Agyrium, Sicily (hence “Diodorus Siculus”) is the author of the
Bibliothēkē
(‘Library’), a universal history whose scope spa...
The Bull of Phalaris and the Historical Method of Diodorus of Sicily
The Bull of Phalaris and the Historical Method of Diodorus of Sicily
The problems surrounding the bull of Phalaris have exercised ancient historians for well over a century now. The present study aims to open a new perspective in dealing with these ...
Semiramis’ Legacy
Semiramis’ Legacy
The chapter starts with a discussion on the historical characters that may have contributed to Diodorus’ imaginary picture of Semiramis. The chapter also make clear that Diodorus c...
The Sources of Justin on Macedonia to the Death of Philip
The Sources of Justin on Macedonia to the Death of Philip
In this article I am making what is, as far as I know, the first systematic analysis of Justin books 7, 8 and 9. The method is that which I employed in analysing the sources of Dio...
Alexander III., Dareios I. und das speererworbene Land (Diod. 17, 17, 2)
Alexander III., Dareios I. und das speererworbene Land (Diod. 17, 17, 2)
AbstractThis article aims to shed new light on Diodorus’ episode about Alexander’s crossing of the Hellespont by bringing ancient Near Eastern evidence into discussion. I assume th...
Semiramis' Legacy
Semiramis' Legacy
In
Semiramis’ Legacy
, the history of Persia (in its widest sense) is followed as it has been described by the Greek author Diodorus of Sici...
Diodorus’ Sources
Diodorus’ Sources
In this chapter, firstly the sources Diodorus himself used -about 144 different authors can be recognised as sources for the Historical Library- are examined. Next the reception of...

