Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity

View through CrossRef
Abstract This article offers a study of Thomas Hobbes’s reading of Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historiographer of the 1st century bc whom Hobbes called “the greatest antiquary perhaps that ever was.” After offering a comparison of the works of Thucydides (often regarded as Hobbes’s greatest classical model) and Diodorus, the article traces the reception of Diodorus’ work in early modern England and examines Diodorus’ strong influence on two principal works, De Homine and Behemoth. Early human histories in the first books of Diodorus’ Bibliotheke Historike (‘Historical Library), including anthropological and cosmological narratives, are a recurrent feature of Hobbes’s focus, and a certain subversiveness animates Hobbes’s use of Diodorus and underpins his critique of contemporary theological and political structures. One result of this research is to suggest a greater place for Diodorus in Hobbes’s intellectual world than previously realised, alongside a strong appreciation for Diodorus across multiple learned discourses in the pre-modern period.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: Thomas Hobbes, Diodorus Siculus, and Early Humanity
Description:
Abstract This article offers a study of Thomas Hobbes’s reading of Diodorus Siculus, a Greek historiographer of the 1st century bc whom Hobbes called “the greatest antiquary perhaps that ever was.
” After offering a comparison of the works of Thucydides (often regarded as Hobbes’s greatest classical model) and Diodorus, the article traces the reception of Diodorus’ work in early modern England and examines Diodorus’ strong influence on two principal works, De Homine and Behemoth.
Early human histories in the first books of Diodorus’ Bibliotheke Historike (‘Historical Library), including anthropological and cosmological narratives, are a recurrent feature of Hobbes’s focus, and a certain subversiveness animates Hobbes’s use of Diodorus and underpins his critique of contemporary theological and political structures.
One result of this research is to suggest a greater place for Diodorus in Hobbes’s intellectual world than previously realised, alongside a strong appreciation for Diodorus across multiple learned discourses in the pre-modern period.

Related Results

Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
Hobbes’s Deceiving God: the Correspondence Between Thomas Hobbes and Rene Descartes
In presenting their correspondence, I highlight the means in which Hobbes is able to divorce nature and politics in his philosophy. This is done by bringing to light Hobbes’s agree...
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the Bibliothēkē , before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Diodorus (3), Diodorus Siculus, author of the Bibliothēkē , before 90 BCE–after 30 BCE
Diodorus (3) of Agyrium, Sicily (hence “Diodorus Siculus”) is the author of the Bibliothēkē (‘Library’), a universal history whose scope spa...
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law
The Concept of Humanity in International Criminal Law It is difficult to find a more ambiguous and multifaceted category than the concept of humanity. This is all the mor...
Natural Philosophy, Abstraction, and Mathematics among Materialists: Thomas Hobbes and Margaret Cavendish on Light
Natural Philosophy, Abstraction, and Mathematics among Materialists: Thomas Hobbes and Margaret Cavendish on Light
The nature of light is a focus of Thomas Hobbes’s natural philosophical project. Hobbes’s explanation of the light (lux) of lucid bodies differs across his works, from dilation and...
Archibald Campbell, Critic of Hobbes
Archibald Campbell, Critic of Hobbes
Abstract In the 1733 edition of An Enquiry into the Original of Moral Virtue, Archibald Campbell added two lengthy discussions of Thomas Hobbes’s views on human nature and sociabil...
Фронтиспис «Левиафана» как визуальный источник интерпретации идей Томаса Гоббса о демонологии
Фронтиспис «Левиафана» как визуальный источник интерпретации идей Томаса Гоббса о демонологии
Известный трактат Томаса Гоббса «Левиафан, или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского» (1651) не только представляет собой обширный политический труд, но и в...
The ‘Mortall God’ Vindicated
The ‘Mortall God’ Vindicated
Abstract This brief concluding chapter traces the argumentative structure Hobbes erected to vindicate the sovereign from all taints of injustice. The conceptual buil...
Was Diodorus right?
Was Diodorus right?
In the article, an attempt to find archaeological confirmation of the information of Agatharhides Cnides information in Diodorus Siculus regarding the election of a king has been u...

Back to Top