Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Petrarch, Scholarship, and Traditions of Love Poetry
View through CrossRef
This chapter focuses on Petrarch's (1304–1374) own poetry in order to articulate what he achieved and how he used his sources. In returning to the source, the chapter reveals how good Petrarch's poems are and how much their excellence owes to his subtle and restrained exploitation of the tradition of his poetic predecessors. It begins by considering the advice which Petrarch gives scholars and writers about imitation and the ways of using one's reading in order to write. He was aware of the role which his own work might play as a model for other writers, and he advised them on how to use their reading. Drawing on previous scholarship, the chapter makes some connections between his Italian poems and what he says about his life in the collections of letters which he constructed and in his Secretum. Then it looks at some examples of Petrarch's poems, both to substantiate a claim about their excellence and to show how that excellence derives from his creative use of his reading. Finally, the chapter considers his attitude to Dante, his immediate and overwhelming forerunner, and discusses the ways in which later writers used Petrarch's work.
Title: Petrarch, Scholarship, and Traditions of Love Poetry
Description:
This chapter focuses on Petrarch's (1304–1374) own poetry in order to articulate what he achieved and how he used his sources.
In returning to the source, the chapter reveals how good Petrarch's poems are and how much their excellence owes to his subtle and restrained exploitation of the tradition of his poetic predecessors.
It begins by considering the advice which Petrarch gives scholars and writers about imitation and the ways of using one's reading in order to write.
He was aware of the role which his own work might play as a model for other writers, and he advised them on how to use their reading.
Drawing on previous scholarship, the chapter makes some connections between his Italian poems and what he says about his life in the collections of letters which he constructed and in his Secretum.
Then it looks at some examples of Petrarch's poems, both to substantiate a claim about their excellence and to show how that excellence derives from his creative use of his reading.
Finally, the chapter considers his attitude to Dante, his immediate and overwhelming forerunner, and discusses the ways in which later writers used Petrarch's work.
Related Results
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Tekstualni subjekt u poeziji Marije Stepanove od 2001. do 2017. godine
Maria Stepanova (b. 1972) is a contemporary Russian poet who has emerged in recent decades as one of the most original and complex voices on the poetically highly heterogeneous and...
Rudolph Agricola's Life of Petrarch
Rudolph Agricola's Life of Petrarch
Among the many personal faults with which Petrarch, in his dialogue entitled The Secret or The Soul's Conflict with Passion, let himself be charged by St. Augustine, there was one ...
Secretum meum / Moja tajemnica
Secretum meum / Moja tajemnica
The research project’s aim is to translate Petrarch’s Secretum meum (My Secret Book) into Polish and publish it in an academic edition. This treatise in three books (1347-1353) is ...
Martin Luther and Love
Martin Luther and Love
Abstract
The questions of love’s nature and its different forms were crucial to Martin Luther from the beginning of his theological career. Already as a young mon...
Ironi Cinta Sinta pada “Tanya Sinta, 3” dan “Sinta Gugat, 2” dalam Antologi Puisi Kemelut Cinta Rahwana Karya Djoko Saryono
Ironi Cinta Sinta pada “Tanya Sinta, 3” dan “Sinta Gugat, 2” dalam Antologi Puisi Kemelut Cinta Rahwana Karya Djoko Saryono
Abstract: Irony can happen anywhere, especially when it comes to love. Love can be seen as a human perception in looking at life and the world. Love has many forms. The ideal form ...
‘Volto di Medusa’: Monumentalizing the self in Petrarch'sRerum vulgarium fragmenta
‘Volto di Medusa’: Monumentalizing the self in Petrarch'sRerum vulgarium fragmenta
Scholarship on Petrarch has generally intepreted the figure of Laura-as-Medusa as a projection of the poet's internal conflict between sacred and profane love. Such a reading takes...
Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective
Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective
Abstract
Background
Evolutionary selection pressures, most notably sexual selection, have created (and continue to sustai...

