Javascript must be enabled to continue!
OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
View through CrossRef
Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic repair has emerged as an alternative to conventional open surgery. However, comparative data on postoperative outcomes remains limited, especially in local contexts.
Objective: To compare postoperative pain between laparoscopic and open surgical repair in patients with duodenal ulcer perforation.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat, over six months. Sixty patients with CT-confirmed duodenal ulcer perforation were enrolled and randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n=30) or open repair (n=30). Postoperative pain was assessed on postoperative day 3 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Opioid consumption and time to return to normal activity were also recorded. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21. An independent sample t-test was used with a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: The mean VAS pain score was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (4.5 ± 0.7) than in the open group (6.7 ± 0.8; p<0.001). Opioid requirement in the first 24 hours was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (40 ± 14 mg vs. 60 ± 12 mg; p=0.002). Return to normal activity was faster in the laparoscopic group (14 ± 2 days) compared to the open group (21 ± 4 days; p<0.001). Although operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (140 ± 18 minutes vs. 110 ± 15 minutes), this did not affect clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcer perforation is associated with significantly lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic needs, and faster recovery than open repair, despite a longer operative time. These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in suitable patients, with the caveat of a small sample size and need for further large-scale trials.
Insightful Education Research Institute
Title: OUTCOME OF OPEN REPAIR VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER PERFORATION
Description:
Background: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency.
With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic repair has emerged as an alternative to conventional open surgery.
However, comparative data on postoperative outcomes remains limited, especially in local contexts.
Objective: To compare postoperative pain between laparoscopic and open surgical repair in patients with duodenal ulcer perforation.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Surgery, Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital, Swat, over six months.
Sixty patients with CT-confirmed duodenal ulcer perforation were enrolled and randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n=30) or open repair (n=30).
Postoperative pain was assessed on postoperative day 3 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Opioid consumption and time to return to normal activity were also recorded.
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21.
An independent sample t-test was used with a significance level of p<0.
05.
Results: The mean VAS pain score was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (4.
5 ± 0.
7) than in the open group (6.
7 ± 0.
8; p<0.
001).
Opioid requirement in the first 24 hours was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group (40 ± 14 mg vs.
60 ± 12 mg; p=0.
002).
Return to normal activity was faster in the laparoscopic group (14 ± 2 days) compared to the open group (21 ± 4 days; p<0.
001).
Although operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (140 ± 18 minutes vs.
110 ± 15 minutes), this did not affect clinical outcomes.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of duodenal ulcer perforation is associated with significantly lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic needs, and faster recovery than open repair, despite a longer operative time.
These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in suitable patients, with the caveat of a small sample size and need for further large-scale trials.
Related Results
Outcome of Laparoscopic Repair of Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Compared with Open Technique
Outcome of Laparoscopic Repair of Duodenal Ulcer Perforation Compared with Open Technique
Background: The surgical treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers is not controversial; however, the best surgical strategy is still up for debate. The perforation closure with an o...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Abstract
Introduction: Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex surgical procedure associated with a high rate of complications, particularly those arising from...
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open proc...
Comparison between Laparoscopic Vs Open Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer
Comparison between Laparoscopic Vs Open Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer
Background and objective: Patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease frequently arrive at medical facilities late for treatment, which raises morbidity and mortality rates in un...
Association of Helicobacter Pylori with Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Association of Helicobacter Pylori with Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Background: Helicobacter pylori is found in more than 90% cases of peptic ulcer. This study examines the possibility of association of Helicobacter pylori in perforated peptic ulce...
THE EVIDENCE FOR THE REGULATORY ROLE OF ENDOGENOUS GIP AS A GLUCOSE DEPENDENT INSULINOTROPIC HORMONE IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER
THE EVIDENCE FOR THE REGULATORY ROLE OF ENDOGENOUS GIP AS A GLUCOSE DEPENDENT INSULINOTROPIC HORMONE IN PATIENTS WITH DUODENAL ULCER
SUMMARYIn order to investigate the mechanism of GIP secretion and the role of endogenous GIP in the enteroinsular axis in duodenal ulcer patients, we have compared plasma GIP, insu...
Modified Graham’s repair for peptic ulcer perforation: reassessment study
Modified Graham’s repair for peptic ulcer perforation: reassessment study
Background: Peptic perforation is an emergency and requires urgent surgical treatment. Many modalities of treatment are available ranging from conservative treatment to laparoscopi...

