Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open procedure.
Objectives: Laparoscopic procedure for appendectomy is compared with open surgical Technique with respect to: Duration of procedure, Post-operative pain, Cosmetic benefit, Complication encountered, Post-operative length of hospital stay, Return to the work
Methods and materials: A prospective retrospective study that included 200 male and female patients with acute appendicitis, Statistical comparison was made using the X2 test and the Students’ t’ test.
Results: In this study, the average pain score was 1.31 ± 0.49 in the laparoscopic surgery group, and the average pain score in the open surgery group was 3.27 ± 0.828, statistical significance (P<0.0001).
Vomiting occurred in 20% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 53% of open surgery patients. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.007). Wound infection occurred in 3% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01), fever occurred in 13% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01).
The average hospital stay was 1.77 days in laparoscopic patients and 7.73 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001).
The average return to work was 9.6 days in laparoscopic patients and 17.67 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001).
The average duration of surgery was 36.17 minutes in laparoscopic patients, while it was 17.5 minutes in open surgery patients, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001).
Postoperative scar satisfaction was higher among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (87%), compared to open surgery (50%), with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.004)
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy in a properly prepared and selected patient in terms of Post-operative pain, Post-operative complications like vomiting, wound infection, fever, Duration of the hospital stay, return to the work, Cosmetic benefit, Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy is better than open appendectomy in the properly selected patients of acute appendicitis at the cost of increase in the duration of the time of surgery.
Title: Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Description:
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open procedure.
Objectives: Laparoscopic procedure for appendectomy is compared with open surgical Technique with respect to: Duration of procedure, Post-operative pain, Cosmetic benefit, Complication encountered, Post-operative length of hospital stay, Return to the work
Methods and materials: A prospective retrospective study that included 200 male and female patients with acute appendicitis, Statistical comparison was made using the X2 test and the Students’ t’ test.
Results: In this study, the average pain score was 1.
31 ± 0.
49 in the laparoscopic surgery group, and the average pain score in the open surgery group was 3.
27 ± 0.
828, statistical significance (P<0.
0001).
Vomiting occurred in 20% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 53% of open surgery patients.
The difference was statistically significant (P<0.
007).
Wound infection occurred in 3% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients.
The difference was statistically significant (P <0.
01), fever occurred in 13% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.
01).
The average hospital stay was 1.
77 days in laparoscopic patients and 7.
73 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
The average return to work was 9.
6 days in laparoscopic patients and 17.
67 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
The average duration of surgery was 36.
17 minutes in laparoscopic patients, while it was 17.
5 minutes in open surgery patients, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
Postoperative scar satisfaction was higher among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (87%), compared to open surgery (50%), with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.
004)
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy in a properly prepared and selected patient in terms of Post-operative pain, Post-operative complications like vomiting, wound infection, fever, Duration of the hospital stay, return to the work, Cosmetic benefit, Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy is better than open appendectomy in the properly selected patients of acute appendicitis at the cost of increase in the duration of the time of surgery.
Related Results
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surge...
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with ...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.
Study Design: Randomized control trial.
Place and duratio...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LATERALIZED TRANSVERSE INCISION APPENDECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Objectives: The objective of this study were to compare the effectiveness of lateral transverse cosmetic incision (LTCI) versus laparoscopic appendectomy in terms of operative and ...
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy
ABSTRACT
Objective:
Appendectomy is one of the most common surgical emergencies for appendicitis. Despite the improvemen...
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN PATIENTS OF ASCENDING COLON TUMOR
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY IN PATIENTS OF ASCENDING COLON TUMOR
Background: In addition to rectum, ascending colon and caecum can also develop cancer. Right hemicolectomy is the operation of choice for later two. Laparoscopic right hemicolecto...
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
A Study of Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objectives: To compare post-operative pain, analgesic requirements, complications, hospital stay, and recovery outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
Methodology: Thi...

