Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open procedure. Objectives: Laparoscopic procedure for appendectomy is compared with open surgical Technique with respect to: Duration of procedure, Post-operative pain, Cosmetic benefit, Complication encountered, Post-operative length of hospital stay, Return to the work Methods and materials: A prospective retrospective study that included 200 male and female patients with acute appendicitis, Statistical comparison was made using the X2 test and the Students’ t’ test. Results: In this study, the average pain score was 1.31 ± 0.49 in the laparoscopic surgery group, and the average pain score in the open surgery group was 3.27 ± 0.828, statistical significance (P<0.0001). Vomiting occurred in 20% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 53% of open surgery patients. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.007). Wound infection occurred in 3% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01), fever occurred in 13% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). The average hospital stay was 1.77 days in laparoscopic patients and 7.73 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). The average return to work was 9.6 days in laparoscopic patients and 17.67 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). The average duration of surgery was 36.17 minutes in laparoscopic patients, while it was 17.5 minutes in open surgery patients, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.0001). Postoperative scar satisfaction was higher among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (87%), compared to open surgery (50%), with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.004) Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy in a properly prepared and selected patient in terms of Post-operative pain, Post-operative complications like vomiting, wound infection, fever, Duration of the hospital stay, return to the work, Cosmetic benefit, Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy is better than open appendectomy in the properly selected patients of acute appendicitis at the cost of increase in the duration of the time of surgery.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Description:
Abstract Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open procedure.
Objectives: Laparoscopic procedure for appendectomy is compared with open surgical Technique with respect to: Duration of procedure, Post-operative pain, Cosmetic benefit, Complication encountered, Post-operative length of hospital stay, Return to the work Methods and materials: A prospective retrospective study that included 200 male and female patients with acute appendicitis, Statistical comparison was made using the X2 test and the Students’ t’ test.
Results: In this study, the average pain score was 1.
31 ± 0.
49 in the laparoscopic surgery group, and the average pain score in the open surgery group was 3.
27 ± 0.
828, statistical significance (P<0.
0001).
Vomiting occurred in 20% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 53% of open surgery patients.
The difference was statistically significant (P<0.
007).
Wound infection occurred in 3% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients.
The difference was statistically significant (P <0.
01), fever occurred in 13% of laparoscopic surgery patients and 27% of open surgery patients, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.
01).
The average hospital stay was 1.
77 days in laparoscopic patients and 7.
73 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
The average return to work was 9.
6 days in laparoscopic patients and 17.
67 days in open surgery, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
The average duration of surgery was 36.
17 minutes in laparoscopic patients, while it was 17.
5 minutes in open surgery patients, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.
0001).
Postoperative scar satisfaction was higher among patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (87%), compared to open surgery (50%), with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.
004) Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy in a properly prepared and selected patient in terms of Post-operative pain, Post-operative complications like vomiting, wound infection, fever, Duration of the hospital stay, return to the work, Cosmetic benefit, Overall, laparoscopic appendectomy is better than open appendectomy in the properly selected patients of acute appendicitis at the cost of increase in the duration of the time of surgery.

Related Results

Comparative Study of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy with Complications in Government and Private Sector Hospitals
Comparative Study of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy with Complications in Government and Private Sector Hospitals
Background: Patients face a 6% lifetime probability of undergoing appendectomy as an emergency surgical treatment. The surgical treatment methods known as Open Appendectomy (OA) an...
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. ...
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surge...
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with ...
Basic principles of laparoscopic appendectomy
Basic principles of laparoscopic appendectomy
Introduction. Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the simplest laparoscopic procedures, which is gradually becoming the method of choice in treatment of acute appendicitis du...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Place and duratio...
Tiny datablock in saving Hadoop distributed file system wasted memory
Tiny datablock in saving Hadoop distributed file system wasted memory
<p>Hadoop distributed file system (HDFS) is the file system whereby Hadoop is use it to store all the upcoming data inside it. Since it been declared, HDFS is consuming a hug...

Back to Top