Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

<b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment. Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a popular practice in most centers with the introduction of the technique of minimally invasive surgery. Nevertheless, open appendectomy remains very common in low- and middle-income nations as a result of resource shortages. Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, complications and pain scores between laparoscopic appendectomy and an open appendectomy. Material and Method: A prospective observational comparative study was carried out in Department of surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2024 to December 2024. One hundred patients (aged 18 years or older) having acute appendicitis were included (50 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy and 50 cases of open appendectomy). The information concerning demographic data, operative data, postoperative complications, pain measurements (VAS), and length of stay was collected and compared. Results: The mean age of patients was 28.4 ± 10.2 in the laparoscopic group and 30.7 ± 11.5 in the open group. The laparoscopic cases took a lot less time during the operation (45.3 +/- 9.6 minutes), as compared to Open surgery cases (60.1 ± 12.8 minutes). Laparoscopic patients had a shorter length of stay (2.1 ± 0.8 days) compared with those undergoing sharp appendectomy (3.2 ± 1.1 days). The incidences of postoperative wound infections were less in the laparoscopic (6%) than in the open group (18%). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy due to decreased operating time, less operative morbidity, fewer complications, shorter stay and less postoperative pain. It should be promoted as the method of choice in surgery to be performed in tertiary care facilities in Pakistan, and work should be put into increasing the availability of laparoscopic facilities. 
Title: <b>COMAPRISON OF OUTCOMES IN LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY VS OPEN APPENDECTOMY</b>
Description:
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is a surgical emergency that is amongst the most frequently performed all over the globe, with open appendectomy being the conventional treatment.
Laparoscopic appendectomy has become a popular practice in most centers with the introduction of the technique of minimally invasive surgery.
Nevertheless, open appendectomy remains very common in low- and middle-income nations as a result of resource shortages.
Objective: To compare the incidence of postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, complications and pain scores between laparoscopic appendectomy and an open appendectomy.
Material and Method: A prospective observational comparative study was carried out in Department of surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center Karachi, Pakistan, from July 2024 to December 2024.
One hundred patients (aged 18 years or older) having acute appendicitis were included (50 cases of laparoscopic appendectomy and 50 cases of open appendectomy).
The information concerning demographic data, operative data, postoperative complications, pain measurements (VAS), and length of stay was collected and compared.
Results: The mean age of patients was 28.
4 ± 10.
2 in the laparoscopic group and 30.
7 ± 11.
5 in the open group.
The laparoscopic cases took a lot less time during the operation (45.
3 +/- 9.
6 minutes), as compared to Open surgery cases (60.
1 ± 12.
8 minutes).
Laparoscopic patients had a shorter length of stay (2.
1 ± 0.
8 days) compared with those undergoing sharp appendectomy (3.
2 ± 1.
1 days).
The incidences of postoperative wound infections were less in the laparoscopic (6%) than in the open group (18%).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy due to decreased operating time, less operative morbidity, fewer complications, shorter stay and less postoperative pain.
It should be promoted as the method of choice in surgery to be performed in tertiary care facilities in Pakistan, and work should be put into increasing the availability of laparoscopic facilities.
 .

Related Results

Comparative Study of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy with Complications in Government and Private Sector Hospitals
Comparative Study of Open and Laparoscopic Appendectomy with Complications in Government and Private Sector Hospitals
Background: Patients face a 6% lifetime probability of undergoing appendectomy as an emergency surgical treatment. The surgical treatment methods known as Open Appendectomy (OA) an...
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Comparison between laparoscopic and Open surgery in appendectomy and return-to-work
Abstract Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has rapidly become established as the popular alternative to open appendectomy, it has a safety profile better than open proc...
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies globally, with appendectomy remaining the definitive treatment. Advances in minimally invasive surge...
Basic principles of laparoscopic appendectomy
Basic principles of laparoscopic appendectomy
Introduction. Laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the simplest laparoscopic procedures, which is gradually becoming the method of choice in treatment of acute appendicitis du...
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Appendectomy Open Versus Laparoscopic in Developing World Scenario
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is an expanding field which is recognized as gold standard for cholecystectomy, it is being increasingly used by many surgical subspecialties with ...
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Comparison between Open versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Objective: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Place and duratio...
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
A <span aria-describedby="tippy-18">Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery
Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery robot-assisted surgical system has gained significant popularity over open and laparoscopic interventions. However, given its high c...
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Outcome of laparoscopy assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy at the department of gastrointestinal surgery, Viet Duc University Hospital
Abstract Introduction: Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex surgical procedure associated with a high rate of complications, particularly those arising from...

Back to Top