Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Asian Development Bank and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – is cooperation possible?
View through CrossRef
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is a well-known financial institution operating in the Asia-Pacific region since 1966. The rise of this multilateral organization was sponsored mainly by Japan, for which, no doubt, it is still an important instrument of external policy. However, nowadays the ADB constitutes 67 members (48 regional and 19 non-regional), including PR China. With an impressive budget (ca. $20 billion) and focus areas ranging from social development to information technologies, the ADB is an important source of development funding.
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a rather new initiative, only opening up for business in January 2016. Based in Beijing, it is a multilateral organization comprising 57 founding members (37 regional members and 20 nonregional partners), excluding Japan and the United States. The creation of the AIIB is a reaction to the fiasco of the transformation of global financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group. China’s intentions in initiating the AIIB are clearly something other than altruism. It might be seen as part of a win-win economic cooperation strategy that could benefit both regional and national development processes. Like the ADB, the AIIB focuses on the development of infrastructure and other productive sectors in the Asia-Pacific region.
The question is, should we anticipate strong rivalry between these two institutions, as political realism would suggest, or will the ADB and the AIIB find a way to offer their best to the Asia- Pacific countries without any major conflict?
Title: Asian Development Bank and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – is cooperation possible?
Description:
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is a well-known financial institution operating in the Asia-Pacific region since 1966.
The rise of this multilateral organization was sponsored mainly by Japan, for which, no doubt, it is still an important instrument of external policy.
However, nowadays the ADB constitutes 67 members (48 regional and 19 non-regional), including PR China.
With an impressive budget (ca.
$20 billion) and focus areas ranging from social development to information technologies, the ADB is an important source of development funding.
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a rather new initiative, only opening up for business in January 2016.
Based in Beijing, it is a multilateral organization comprising 57 founding members (37 regional members and 20 nonregional partners), excluding Japan and the United States.
The creation of the AIIB is a reaction to the fiasco of the transformation of global financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group.
China’s intentions in initiating the AIIB are clearly something other than altruism.
It might be seen as part of a win-win economic cooperation strategy that could benefit both regional and national development processes.
Like the ADB, the AIIB focuses on the development of infrastructure and other productive sectors in the Asia-Pacific region.
The question is, should we anticipate strong rivalry between these two institutions, as political realism would suggest, or will the ADB and the AIIB find a way to offer their best to the Asia- Pacific countries without any major conflict?.
Related Results
Proposed Accounting Standard for High Risk Investment
Proposed Accounting Standard for High Risk Investment
The purpose of this paper is to suggest a new Accounting Standard, which details the separate disclosures required for ‘High Risk Investment’ held by the entities; those are not in...
Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Investing: The Concept and Classification of Schemes with Legal Significance
Introduction: the theme of investment and investing invisibly but tangibly accompanies a person in modern life. The desire to increase their funds is becoming an urgent need of the...
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
ACTUAL ISSUES OF ASSESSMENT OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT
One of the most important factors of the sustainable and safe development of the national economy is the availability of investment resources in the economy, the establishment of a...
Investment Governance for Fiduciaries
Investment Governance for Fiduciaries
Governance is a word that is increasingly heard and read in modern times, be it corporate governance, global governance, or investment governance. Investment governance, the centra...
SCREENING DAN EVALUASI PROGRAM BANK SAMPAH KOTA YOGYAKARTA
SCREENING DAN EVALUASI PROGRAM BANK SAMPAH KOTA YOGYAKARTA
Pendahuluan: Badan Lingkungan Hidup (DLH) Kota Yogyakarta Sejak Tahun 2009 mengembangkan program bank sampah sebagai salah satu kegiatan yang dilaksanakan oleh Sub Bidang Daur Ulan...
Public Infrastructure Investment - Enough Bang for the Buck?
Public Infrastructure Investment - Enough Bang for the Buck?
After a decade of declining capital spending, public infrastructure investment is surging in the US and Europe. Scaling up spending on infrastructure has become an essential elemen...
Exploring the Impact of Post-Investment Management on Investment Funds
Exploring the Impact of Post-Investment Management on Investment Funds
Post-investment management is an essential element in the functioning of equity investment
funds. The question of whether post-investment management can improve the investment
perf...
FORMATION AND USE OF FINANCIAL POTENTIAL OF INVESTMENT ACTIVITY OF SMALL ENTERPRISES
FORMATION AND USE OF FINANCIAL POTENTIAL OF INVESTMENT ACTIVITY OF SMALL ENTERPRISES
The purpose of the paper is to study the processes of formation and use of financial potential of investment activity of small enterprises. The subject of research is the patterns ...

